Model-based control and estimation of cavity flow oscillations

Techniques for feedback control of oscillations in the flow past a cavity are presented. Low-order models are obtained using two methods (empirical Galerkin models, and a simple nonlinear oscillator model), and validated against 2D direct numerical simulations of the flow, which is actuated by a body force at the leading edge of the cavity. The models are used to construct dynamic observers, which reconstruct the flow state from a single pressure sensor, and perform much better than static estimators commonly used for flow estimation. Several control approaches are compared, including simple proportional control with a phase lag, LQG control using Galerkin models, and a dynamic phasor approach based on the work of Noack et al (2003). All three controllers are implemented in the full simulation, and able to reduce the amplitude of oscillations. The LQG regulator requires careful tuning, and the closed-loop behavior often does not match that predicted by the model, but the dynamic phasor approach eliminates the oscillations completely in the full simulation, with a transient response that matches that predicted by the loworder model.

[1]  Kelly Cohen,et al.  Sensor Placement for Closed-Loop Flow Control of a "D" Shaped Cylinder Wake , 2004 .

[2]  David E. Cox,et al.  Experimental Feedback Control of Flow-Induced Cavity Tones , 2002 .

[3]  B. R. Noack,et al.  A hierarchy of low-dimensional models for the transient and post-transient cylinder wake , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  R. Murray,et al.  Model reduction for compressible flows using POD and Galerkin projection , 2004 .

[5]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robust and optimal control , 1995, Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[6]  Yann Guezennec,et al.  Stochastic estimation of coherent structures in turbulent boundary layers , 1989 .

[7]  Nathan E. Murray,et al.  Low-Dimensional Estimation of Cavity Flow Dynamics , 2004 .

[8]  Louis N. Cattafesta,et al.  Real-Time Adaptive Control of Flow-Induced Cavity Tones (Invited) , 2004 .

[9]  Bernd R. Noack,et al.  Low-Dimensional Models For Feedback Flow Control. Part II: Control Design and Dynamic Estimation , 2004 .

[10]  Clarence W. Rowley,et al.  Review of Active Control of Flow-Induced Cavity Resonance , 2003 .

[11]  M. Response of the Cavity Shear Layer Oscillations to External Forcing , 2022 .

[12]  Mark N. Glauser,et al.  Feedback Control of Separated Flows , 2004 .

[13]  Clarence W. Rowley,et al.  Dynamics and control of high-reynolds-number flow over open cavities , 2006 .

[14]  M. Franchek,et al.  Active control of flow-induced cavity resonance , 1998 .

[15]  P. Holmes,et al.  Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields , 1983, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[16]  C. Rowley,et al.  On self-sustained oscillations in two-dimensional compressible flow over rectangular cavities , 2002, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  Nathan E. Murray,et al.  Estimation of the flowfield from surface pressure measurements in an open cavity , 2003 .

[18]  Louis N. Cattafesta,et al.  Real-Time Adaptive Control of Flow-Induced Cavity Tones , 2004 .

[19]  G. Tadmor,et al.  Control, observation and energy regulation of wake flow instabilities , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[20]  Yassin A. Hassan,et al.  Approximation of turbulent conditional averages by stochastic estimation , 1989 .

[21]  Deepak Shukla,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF AN ADAPTIVE WEAPONS-BAY SUPPRESSION SYSTEM , 1999 .

[22]  Gilead Tadmor,et al.  Low-Dimensional Models For Feedback Flow Control. Part I: Empirical Galerkin models , 2004 .