Oct-1 POU domain-DNA interactions: cooperative binding of isolated subdomains and effects of covalent linkage.

Structural and biochemical studies of Oct-1 POU domain-DNA interactions have raised important questions about cooperativity and the role of the linker connecting the POU-specific domain and the POU homeo domain. To analyze these interactions, we have studied binding of the isolated domains. Surprisingly, we find that two unlinked polypeptides corresponding to the POU-specific domain and the POU homeo domain bind cooperatively to the octamer site and have a coupling energy of 1.6 kcal/mole. We suggest that overlapping DNA contacts near the center of the octamer site may be the source of this cooperativity, as there are no protein-protein contacts between the domains in the crystal structure of the Oct-1 POU domain-DNA complex. These studies also have allowed us to describe the thermodynamic contribution of the linker (present in the intact POU domain) in terms of an effective concentration (3.6 mM). The broader implications for understanding cooperativity in protein-DNA recognition and gene regulation are discussed.

[1]  A. Travers.  DNA conformation and configuration in protein-DNA complexes , 1992 .

[2]  T. Steitz,et al.  Crystal structure of a CAP-DNA complex: the DNA is bent by 90 degrees , 1991, Science.

[3]  T. Creighton.  Proteins: Structures and molecular principles , 1983 .

[4]  M. Brenowitz,et al.  Quantitative DNase I Footprinting , 1993 .

[5]  Jordan,et al.  Structure of the lambda complex at 2.5 A resolution: details of the repressor-operator interactions , 1988, Science.

[6]  J. Dixon,et al.  Eukaryotic proteins expressed in Escherichia coli: an improved thrombin cleavage and purification procedure of fusion proteins with glutathione S-transferase. , 1991, Analytical biochemistry.

[7]  Mark J Alkema,et al.  The DNA binding specificity of the bipartite POU domain and its subdomains. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[8]  John W. R. Schwabe,et al.  The crystal structure of a two zinc-finger peptide reveals an extension to the rules for zinc-finger/DNA recognition , 1993, Nature.

[9]  Stephen K. Burley,et al.  Co-crystal structure of TBP recognizing the minor groove of a TATA element , 1993, Nature.

[10]  L. Beamer,et al.  Refined 1.8 p crystal structure of the ? repressor-operator complex*1 , 1992 .

[11]  C. Pabo,et al.  Distinctive DNA conformation with enlarged major groove is found in Zn-finger-DNA and other protein-DNA complexes. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Steven Hahn,et al.  Crystal structure of a yeast TBP/TATA-box complex , 1993, Nature.

[13]  J. Berg,et al.  Metal-dependent folding of a single zinc finger from transcription factor IIIA. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  W. Herr,et al.  Segments of the POU domain influence one another's DNA-binding specificity , 1992, Molecular and cellular biology.

[15]  Juli D. Klemm,et al.  Crystal structure of the Oct-1 POU domain bound to an octamer site: DNA recognition with tethered DNA-binding modules , 1994, Cell.

[16]  J. Manfredi,et al.  Spacing and orientation of bipartite DNA-binding motifs as potential functional determinants for POU domain factors. , 1993, Genes & development.

[17]  W. Herr,et al.  The POU domain: versatility in transcriptional regulation by a flexible two-in-one DNA-binding domain. , 1995, Genes & development.

[18]  G. Ruvkun,et al.  Regulation of the mec‐3 gene by the C.elegans homeoproteins UNC‐86 and MEC‐3. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[19]  N. Pavletich,et al.  Zinc finger-DNA recognition: crystal structure of a Zif268-DNA complex at 2.1 A , 1991, Science.