Reduced-dose low-voltage chest CT angiography with Sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction versus standard-dose filtered back projection.

PURPOSE To evaluate image quality of low-voltage chest computed tomographic (CT) angiography with raw data-based iterative reconstruction (sonogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction) in comparison with image quality of standard-dose standard-voltage filtered back projection (FBP) CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and the informed consent requirement was waived. Eighty consecutive patients who were referred for follow-up chest CT angiography underwent reduced-dose CT (hereafter, T2 examination) under technical conditions similar to those of the initial examination (hereafter, T1 examination), except the voltage selection was reduced by 20 kV with adaptation of the tube current to ensure a 50% reduction in CT dose index, and regular FBP was replaced by iterative reconstruction with sonogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction. The two techniques were compared by using paired tests (Student t test, Wilcoxon test, or McNemar test, according to the nature of variables). RESULTS When compared with standard-dose T1 studies, reduced-dose T2 images showed: (a) significantly less objective noise at the level of the trachea on mediastinal and lung parenchymal images (P < .001) and no significant difference in objective noise at the level of the aorta on mediastinal images (P = .507); (b) significantly higher signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise (P < .001) ratios; (c) similar visual perception of noise on mediastinal (P = .132) and lung (P = .366) images, mainly rated as moderate; and (d) similar overall subjective image quality (P = .405). CONCLUSION Raw data-based iterative reconstruction yielded equivalent subjective and improved objective image quality of low-voltage half-dose CT angiograms compared with standard-dose FBP CT images for an average dose-length product of less than 80 mGy · cm in this population. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.12120414/-/DC1.

[1]  J. Remy,et al.  Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 2): image quality of low-dose CT examinations in 80 patients , 2011, European Radiology.

[2]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. , 2011, Radiology.

[3]  J. Paul,et al.  Low-kilovoltage multi-detector row chest CT in adults: feasibility and effect on image quality and iodine dose. , 2004, Radiology.

[4]  Francis R Verdun,et al.  Effect of X-ray Tube Parameters, Iodine Concentration, and Patient Size on Image Quality in Pulmonary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Chest-Phantom-Study , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[5]  Peter Vock,et al.  Patient Exposure and Image Quality of Low-Dose Pulmonary Computed Tomography Angiography: Comparison of 100- and 80-kVp Protocols , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[6]  Hiroshi Nishiyama,et al.  Points to consider on switching between superiority and non-inferiority. , 2006, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[7]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a review. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Multidetector Computed Tomography Chest Examinations With Low-Kilovoltage Protocols in Adults: Effect on Image Quality and Radiation Dose , 2009, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  E. Samei,et al.  Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm--initial clinical experience. , 2010, Radiology.

[10]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  CT angiography of pulmonary arteries to detect pulmonary embolism: improvement of vascular enhancement with low kilovoltage settings. , 2006, Radiology.

[11]  M. L. R. D. Christenson,et al.  Image Quality and Radiation Exposure at Pulmonary CT Angiography with 100- or 120-kVp Protocol: Prospective Randomized Study , 2008 .

[12]  C. Gatsonis,et al.  Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening , 2012 .

[13]  C. McCollough,et al.  Dose reduction in helical CT: dynamically adjustable z-axis X-ray beam collimation. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  F. Gleeson,et al.  The risks of radiation exposure related to diagnostic imaging and how to minimise them , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  M. L. R. D. Christenson,et al.  Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening , 2012 .

[16]  M. Kalra,et al.  Radiation Dose Reduction With Chest Computed Tomography Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique: Initial Experience , 2010, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  J. Remy,et al.  Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 1): evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients , 2011, European Radiology.

[18]  J. Remy,et al.  Evaluation of Peripheral Pulmonary Arteries at 80 kV and at 140 kV: Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Assessment in 51 Patients , 2009, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[19]  J. Remy,et al.  Dual-source chest CT angiography with high temporal resolution and high pitch modes: evaluation of image quality in 140 patients , 2010, European Radiology.

[20]  M. L. R. D. Christenson.  Vascular enhancement and image quality of MDCT pulmonary angiography in 400 cases: comparison of standard and low kilovoltage settings , 2010 .

[21]  S. Schindera,et al.  Is body weight the most appropriate criterion to select patients eligible for low-dose pulmonary CT angiography? Analysis of objective and subjective image quality at 80 kVp in 100 patients , 2009, European Radiology.