Power-tracking control for cross-flow turbines

For economic reasons, above a certain water speed, it is desirable for current turbines to maintain a constant power output. This requires a control strategy to shed power. Here, such a strategy is evaluated through simulation and laboratory experiment for a helically bladed turbine with four blades and a straight-bladed turbine with two blades. These are contrasting cases because hydrodynamic torque produced by the straight-bladed turbine has a substantially more azimuthal phase variability than the helically bladed turbine. For practical implementation, a control algorithm is desired that requires only a time-average characteristic performance curve and estimates of angular velocity and control torque. Additionally, the transition between power maximizing and power tracking regimes should be smooth and automatic. The controller can be further constrained to only apply a resistive torque to the turbine. A control strategy satisfying these constraints is shown experimentally to achieve these objectives for both types of turbines at a variety of power set points. The power-tracking error (<3%) is primarily at the blade passage frequency for the straight-bladed turbine and at the rate of turbine rotation for the helical turbine. While partially a consequence of how the generator drive is tuned, comparison to simulation indicates that perfect power-tracking is not generally possible even under ideal conditions for a fixed-pitch, cross-flow turbine using purely resistive torque control.For economic reasons, above a certain water speed, it is desirable for current turbines to maintain a constant power output. This requires a control strategy to shed power. Here, such a strategy is evaluated through simulation and laboratory experiment for a helically bladed turbine with four blades and a straight-bladed turbine with two blades. These are contrasting cases because hydrodynamic torque produced by the straight-bladed turbine has a substantially more azimuthal phase variability than the helically bladed turbine. For practical implementation, a control algorithm is desired that requires only a time-average characteristic performance curve and estimates of angular velocity and control torque. Additionally, the transition between power maximizing and power tracking regimes should be smooth and automatic. The controller can be further constrained to only apply a resistive torque to the turbine. A control strategy satisfying these constraints is shown experimentally to achieve these objectives fo...

[1]  Kathryn E. Johnson,et al.  Baseline Results and Future Plans for the NREL Controls Advanced Research Turbine: Preprint , 2003 .

[2]  Steven L. Brunton,et al.  Intracycle angular velocity control of cross-flow turbines , 2016, Nature Energy.

[3]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Dynamic control of wind turbines , 2010 .

[4]  C. Garrett,et al.  The efficiency of a turbine in a tidal channel , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  Jeff K. Pieper,et al.  Robust Gain Scheduled Control of a Hydrokinetic Turbine , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[6]  Whei-Min Lin,et al.  Intelligent approach to maximum power point tracking control strategy for variable-speed wind turbine generation system , 2010 .

[7]  Brian Polagye,et al.  Performance characterization of a cross-flow hydrokinetic turbine in sheared inflow , 2016 .

[8]  M. R. Dhanak,et al.  An Assessment of the Hydrokinetic Energy Resource of the Florida Current , 2012, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[9]  N. Jenkins,et al.  Wind Energy Handbook: Burton/Wind Energy Handbook , 2011 .

[10]  L Y Pao,et al.  Control of Wind Turbines , 2011, IEEE Control Systems.

[11]  Yaoyu Li,et al.  Maximizing Wind Turbine Energy Capture Using Multivariable Extremum Seeking Control , 2009 .

[12]  Vladimir Nikora,et al.  Despiking Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter Data , 2002 .

[13]  David Schlipf,et al.  Nonlinear model predictive control of wind turbines using LIDAR , 2013 .

[14]  F. Saeed,et al.  H-Darrieus Wind Turbine with Blade Pitch Control , 2009 .

[15]  B. Polagye,et al.  Measurements of Turbulence at Two Tidal Energy Sites in Puget Sound, WA , 2012, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[16]  Brian Polagye,et al.  Multi-mode evaluation of power-maximizing cross-flow turbine controllers , 2017 .

[17]  Geoffrey Ingram Taylor,et al.  The Statistical Theory of Isotropic Turbulence , 1937 .

[18]  John E. Quaicoe,et al.  Hydrokinetic energy conversion systems and assessment of horizontal and vertical axis turbines for river and tidal applications: A technology status review , 2009 .

[19]  Brian Kirke,et al.  Modeling passive variable pitch cross flow hydrokinetic turbines to maximize performance and smooth operation , 2012 .

[20]  L.Y. Pao,et al.  Control of variable-speed wind turbines: standard and adaptive techniques for maximizing energy capture , 2006, IEEE Control Systems.

[21]  M. Wosnik,et al.  Performance measurements of cylindrical- and spherical-helical cross-flow marine hydrokinetic turbines, with estimates of exergy efficiency , 2015 .

[22]  V. Neary,et al.  Turbulent inflow characteristics for hydrokinetic energy conversion in rivers , 2013 .

[23]  Brian Kirke,et al.  Variable Pitch Darrieus Water Turbines , 2008 .

[24]  Seddik Bacha,et al.  Operation of Grid-Connected Cross-Flow Water Turbines in the Stall Region by Direct Power Control , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.