Comparison of standard reading and computer aided detection (CAD) on a national proficiency test of screening mammography.

[1]  T. Freer,et al.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. , 2001, Radiology.

[2]  L. Tabár,et al.  Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. , 2000, Radiology.

[3]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Proficiency test for screening mammography: results for 117 volunteer Italian radiologists , 1999, Journal of medical screening.

[4]  A. Wilson,et al.  Breast imaging, 2nd edn , 1998 .

[5]  N. Perry,et al.  European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Mammography Screening , 1996 .

[6]  [Test for the assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of mammography. Results of 103 tests carried out by Italian radiologists]. , 1996, La Radiologia medica.

[7]  S Ciatto,et al.  Independent Double Reading of Screening Mammograms , 1995, Journal of medical screening.

[8]  E. Thurfjell,et al.  Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. , 1994, Radiology.

[9]  L. Fajardo,et al.  Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's Award. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Roland Holland,et al.  The current detectability of breast cancer in a mammographic screening program. A review of the previous mammograms of interval and screen‐detected cancers , 1993, Cancer.

[11]  R. Bird,et al.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[12]  R. Bird.  Professional quality assurance for mammography screening programs. , 1990, Radiology.