Meta-assessment of bias in science
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] C. Hayer,et al. Pressures to Publish: Catalysts for the Loss of Scientific Writing Integrity? , 2013 .
[2] Jane Qiu,et al. Publish or perish in China , 2010, Nature.
[3] J. Schooler. Unpublished results hide the decline effect , 2011, Nature.
[4] S D Walter,et al. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta‐analysis , 2001, Statistics in medicine.
[5] Shane Connelly,et al. Personality and Ethical Decision-Making in Research: The Role of Perceptions of Self and others , 2007, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.
[6] J. Ioannidis,et al. US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[7] D. Fanelli. “Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences , 2010, PloS one.
[8] Daniele Fanelli,et al. Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries , 2011, Scientometrics.
[9] V. Larivière,et al. Researchers’ Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century , 2016, PloS one.
[10] H. Dubben,et al. Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication bias , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[11] F. Song,et al. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. , 2010, Health technology assessment.
[12] L. Zirulia,et al. The Economics of Scientific Misconduct , 2008 .
[13] John P A Ioannidis,et al. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis. , 2008, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.
[14] S. Goodman,et al. Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices , 2015, PLoS biology.
[15] Nees Jan van Eck,et al. Large scale author name disambiguation using rule-based scoring and clustering , 2014 .
[16] A. Schrank,et al. Incubating Innovation or Cultivating Corruption?: The Developmental State and the Life Sciences in Asia , 2010 .
[17] Mark S. Davis,et al. Narcissism, Entitlement, and Questionable Research Practices in Counseling: A Pilot Study , 2008 .
[18] Melissa S. Anderson,et al. Institutions' Expectations for Researchers' Self-Funding, Federal Grant Holding, and Private Industry Involvement: Manifold Drivers of Self-Interest and Researcher Behavior , 2009, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[19] Paul C. Johnson. Extension of Nakagawa & Schielzeth's R2GLMM to random slopes models , 2014, Methods in ecology and evolution.
[20] Marco Pautasso,et al. Worsening file-drawer problem in the abstracts of natural, medical and social science databases , 2010, Scientometrics.
[21] J. Sterne,et al. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[22] B. Djulbegovic,et al. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[23] J. Ioannidis,et al. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias , 2008, PloS one.
[24] Hendrik P. van Dalen,et al. Intended and Unintended Consequences of a Publish-or-Perish Culture: A Worldwide Survey , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[25] J. Ioannidis,et al. Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science , 2008, PLoS medicine.
[26] Melissa S. Anderson,et al. Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research , 2006, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.
[27] Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al. Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations , 2010, J. Informetrics.
[28] A. Kaatz,et al. Are Men More Likely than Women To Commit Scientific Misconduct? Maybe, Maybe Not , 2013, mBio.
[29] Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al. Benchmarking university-industry research cooperation worldwide: performance measurements and indicators based on co-authorship data for the world's largest universities , 2009 .
[30] J. Ioannidis,et al. Science mapping analysis characterizes 235 biases in biomedical research. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[31] A. Casadevall,et al. Males Are Overrepresented among Life Science Researchers Committing Scientific Misconduct , 2013, mBio.
[32] Wolfgang Glänzel,et al. Bibliometric Evidence for a Hierarchy of the Sciences , 2013, PloS one.
[33] S. Sharp,et al. Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.
[34] Ronald D. Vale,et al. Accelerating scientific publication in biology , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[35] Lisa Hartling,et al. Systematic review data extraction: cross-sectional study showed that experience did not increase accuracy. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[36] Y. Smulders,et al. Publication Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Medical Scientists , 2014, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.
[37] Dimitra Dodou,et al. A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too) , 2015, PeerJ.
[38] D. Fanelli. Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data , 2010, PloS one.
[39] N. Gilbert. Streamlined chemical tests rebuffed , 2010, Nature.
[40] J. Ioannidis,et al. Reply to Nuijten et al.: Reanalyses actually confirm that US studies overestimate effects in softer research , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[41] D. Bates,et al. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.
[42] C. Bailey. Psychopathy, Academic Accountants' Attitudes toward Unethical Research Practices, and Publication Success , 2015 .
[43] John P. A. Ioannidis,et al. Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature , 2016, PLoS biology.
[44] J Trevelyan,et al. East meets West. , 1991, Nursing times.
[45] Jay J Van Bavel,et al. Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[46] Iztok Hozo,et al. When Should Potentially False Research Findings Be Considered Acceptable? , 2007, PLoS medicine.
[47] Thomas A Trikalinos,et al. Early extreme contradictory estimates may appear in published research: the Proteus phenomenon in molecular genetics research and randomized trials. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[48] Theodor D. Sterling,et al. Publication decisions revisited: the effect of the outcome of statistical tests on the decision to p , 1995 .
[49] V. Champion,et al. Cancer Patients' Attitudes toward Future Research Uses of Stored Human Biological Materials , 2007, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.
[50] B. Olsen,et al. Editorial: Journal of Negative Results in Biomedicine , 2002, Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine.
[51] T. Perneger,et al. Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[52] Vincent Larivière,et al. Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity , 2015, PloS one.