Optimum Design of a Dual-Range Force Sensor for Achieving High Sensitivity, Broad Bandwidth, and Large Measurement Range

Force control is very crucial in nanoimprint lithography (NIL). It is necessary to develop a high-performance force sensor to provide real-time force feedback for the control process. Due to the unique procedure of NIL, the developed force sensor should include a high sensitivity, broad bandwidth, and large measurable range. However, these characteristics are normally conflicting in nature and cannot be physically avoided by any force transducers so far. To address this problem, this paper presents a novel dual-range force sensor, and uses a heuristic multiobjective optimization method to make a tradeoff among these characteristics. This method is based on the particle swarm optimization algorithm, meanwhile employs the Pareto ranking scheme to find optimal solutions. Through proper optimization, not only the three characteristics are compromised, the lowest stress concentration of the sensor body is maintained as well. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the optimization, numerical simulations with finite-element software COMSOL are conducted. A prototype sensor is then fabricated according to the optimization results. The simulation and prototype test results indicate that the optimized sensor has a resolution down to 800 $\mu $ N, a bandwidth up to 150 Hz, and a measurable range up to 180 N. All the results prove that the developed force sensor possesses a good property for high-performance force measurement, and satisfies the needs of NIL as well.

[1]  S. Chou,et al.  Imprint Lithography with 25-Nanometer Resolution , 1996, Science.

[2]  Ponnuthurai N. Suganthan,et al.  Multi-objective robust PID controller tuning using two lbests multi-objective particle swarm optimization , 2011, Inf. Sci..

[3]  Luis A. Bastidas,et al.  Multiobjective particle swarm optimization for parameter estimation in hydrology , 2006 .

[4]  G. Székely,et al.  Design and characterization of a novel, robust, tri-axial force sensor , 2013 .

[5]  H. Schift Nanoimprint lithography: An old story in modern times? A review , 2008 .

[6]  P. B. Sujit,et al.  Particle swarm optimization approach for multi-objective composite box-beam design , 2007 .

[7]  Jae Jong Lee,et al.  Passive compliant wafer stage for single-step nano-imprint lithography , 2005 .

[8]  Zheyao Wang,et al.  Analysis and optimization of a compliant mechanism-based digital force/weight sensor , 2005 .

[9]  L. J. Guo,et al.  Nanoimprint Lithography: Methods and Material Requirements , 2007 .

[10]  Qingsong Xu,et al.  A novel compliant micropositioning stage with dual ranges and resolutions , 2014 .

[11]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[12]  J. Ueda,et al.  Analysis of an MRI Compatible Force Sensor for Sensitivity and Precision , 2013, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[13]  Qingsong Xu,et al.  New Flexure Parallel-Kinematic Micropositioning System With Large Workspace , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[14]  Michel Kinnaert,et al.  Design, manufacturing and implementation of a novel 2-axis force sensor for haptic applications , 2014 .

[15]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Evolutionary multi-objective optimization: a historical view of the field , 2006, IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag..

[16]  Kookheon Char,et al.  Step-and-repeat process for thermal nanoimprint lithography. , 2010, Nanotechnology.

[17]  Gabi Gruetzner,et al.  Nanoimprint lithography: An alternative nanofabrication approach , 2003 .

[18]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  A novel multi-axis force sensor for microrobotics applications , 2009 .

[19]  Han Ding,et al.  Design of a fine alignment system featuring active orientation adjustment for nano imprint lithography. , 2014, The Review of scientific instruments.

[20]  A. Rezaee Jordehi,et al.  Parameter selection in particle swarm optimisation: a survey , 2013, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[21]  Edmond Lou,et al.  Optimization of a Low-Cost Force Sensor for Spinal Orthosis Applications , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[22]  Nilesh Dhananjaya Mankame Investigations on contact-aided compliant mechanisms , 2004 .

[23]  Yangmin Li,et al.  Design, Analysis, and Test of a Novel 2-DOF Nanopositioning System Driven by Dual Mode , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[24]  Cong Lu,et al.  Topology Optimization of Piezoelectric Force Sensor , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Apperceiving Computing and Intelligence Analysis.