Effects of animal/feeding-place ratio on the behaviour and performance of fattening pigs fed via sensor-controlled liquid feeding

Sensor feeding is a liquid feeding system for fattening pigs that is run with a restricted animal/ feeding-place ratio (AFR). Feeding occurs at specific periods, so that the trough is left empty inbetween. Therefore, it must be regarded as an ad libitum feeding system. The aim of the present study was to quantify the effect of three different AFRs (4:1, 7:1 and 13:1) with nine, six and three feeding places per group, respectively, on the behaviour and performance of fattening pigs (25‐100 kg) housed in groups of 40 individuals. Each AFR was tested with seven groups (21 groups in total). With each group, four pigs were selected from each weight class (lightweight, middleweight and heavyweight) as focal animals. The behaviour in the feeding area was observed by means of 24 h-video-recording for the 12 focal pigs at an age of 14 and 17 weeks. Daily weight gain was calculated for all animals. As the AFR increased, feeding bout duration at the trough declined significantly (p < 0.001), whilst the duration of waiting increased (p < 0.001). The AFR had no significant effect on the frequency of aggressive displacements at the feeding trough. On the other hand, the fatteners were more frequently pushed away from the trough without aggressive interactions as theAFR increased (p < 0.001).Besides theAFR, the age and weight class of the focal pigs had a significant effect on behaviour. Lightweight animals waited longer for access to the trough and were more often displaced from the trough as a consequence of aggressive interactions. Weight gain was lower as AFR increased (p < 0.001), an effect that was more pronounced in lightweight focal

[1]  L. L. Hansen,et al.  Behavioural results and performance of bacon pigs fed "ad libitum" from one or several self-feeders [feeding behaviour, activity, weight gain, agression, nozzling behaviour, tailbiting, hierarchy, rank, competition] , 1982 .

[2]  N. Walker.  The effects on performance and behaviour of number of growing pigs per mono-place feeder , 1991 .

[3]  J. Krebs,et al.  An introduction to behavioural ecology, 2nd ed. , 1987 .

[4]  J. Rushen.  Assessment of fighting ability or simple habituation: What causes young pigs (Sus scrofa) to stop fighting? , 1988 .

[5]  J. Krebs,et al.  An introduction to behavioural ecology , 1981 .

[6]  S. Edwards,et al.  Effect of social group size and initial live weight on feeder space requirement of growing pigs given food ad libitum , 2002 .

[7]  P. Jensen.  An ethogram of social interaction patterns in group-housed dry sows , 1980 .

[8]  J. Fernandez,et al.  Feeding patterns, growth performance and carcass traits in group- housed growing-finishing pigs: the effect of terminal sire line, halothane genotype and age , 2003 .

[9]  J. Botermans,et al.  Effect of Feeding Environment on Performance, Injuries, Plasma Cortisol and Behaviour in Growing-finishing Pigs: Studies on Individual Pigs Housed in Groups , 2000 .

[10]  B. L. Nielsen,et al.  On the interpretation of feeding behaviour measures and the use of feeding rate as an indicator of social constraint , 1999 .

[11]  Bakken,et al.  The effects of weight asymmetry and resource distribution on aggression in groups of unacquainted pigs. , 2000, Applied animal behaviour science.

[12]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[13]  N. O’Connell,et al.  Influence of social status on the welfare of growing pigs housed in barren and enriched environments , 2004, Animal Welfare.

[14]  R. Norman,et al.  Behavioral, endocrine, immune, and performance measures for pigs exposed to acute stress. , 1998, Journal of animal science.