Effects of interlighting on yield and external fruit quality in year-round cultivated cucumber

Abstract The effects of interlighting and of the proportion of interlight on the yield and fruit quality of year-round cultivated cucumber ( Cucumis sativus L. cv. Cumuli) were investigated for this study. Artificial lighting was provided by high pressure sodium (HPS) lamps and the lighting regimes included top lighting (TL), top + interlighting 24% (T + IL24) and top + interlighting 48% (T + IL48). In TL, all of the lamps were mounted above the canopy. In T + IL24 and T + IL48, top lamps covered 76 and 52% of the lighting, respectively, while 24 and 48% of the lighting came from interlighting lamps which were mounted vertically 1.3 m above the ground between the single plant rows. The outdoor daily light integral (DLI) varied greatly during the cultivation periods; the mean values were 36.8, 5.3 and 19.9 mol m −2  day −1 for the summer, autumn–winter and spring stands, respectively. Lighting regime affected both yield and external fruit quality. Interlighting increased first class yield and decreased unmarketable yield, both in weight and number. The increase in the annual first class yield in weight was 15% in the two T + IL regimes. Interlighting improved energy use efficiency in lighting, being for the whole year 120, 130 and 127 g total yield kW h −1 in TL, T + IL24 and T + IL48, respectively. Interlighting increased the fruit skin chlorophyll concentration in all seasons, but had only a minor effect on the fruit dry matter concentration. The mean total chlorophyll concentration in fruit skin was 70.8, 76.7 and 82.2 μg cm −2 in TL, T + IL24 and T + IL48, respectively. In addition, interlighting extended the post-harvest shelf life of cucumber fruits in spring. Besides interlighting per se , also the higher proportion of interlight tended to further improve the fruit quality. For example, the fruit skin chlorophyll concentration increased along with the higher proportion of interlighting. In general, the effects of lighting regime were more prominent in lower natural light conditions in winter and spring. It is concluded that interlighting is a recommendable lighting method in cucumber cultivation, especially in lower natural light conditions.

[1]  D. Aikman.  Potential Increase in Photosynthetic Efficiency from the Redistribution of Solar Radiation in a Crop , 1989 .

[2]  Photosynthesis and Production in a Changing Environment , 1993 .

[3]  W. C. Lin,et al.  Nutrient Concentration and Fruit Thinning Affect Shelf Life of Long English Cucumber , 1991 .

[4]  J. Näkkilä,et al.  INCREASING PRODUCTIVITY OF SWEET PEPPER WITH INTERLIGHTING , 2006 .

[5]  Ep Heuvelink,et al.  Horticultural Lighting in the Netherlands: New Developments , 2006 .

[6]  André Gosselin,et al.  Photoperiod and Photosynthetic Photon Flux Influence Growth and Quality of Greenhouse-grown Lettuce , 1994 .

[7]  R. G. Hurd,et al.  Some effects of air and root temperatures on the yield and quality of glasshouse tomatoes , 1985 .

[8]  L. Marcelis.  Non-destructive measurements and growth analysis of the cucumber fruit , 1992 .

[9]  A. P. Papadopoulos,et al.  Effects of supplemental lighting and cover materials on growth, photosynthesis, biomass partitioning, early yield and quality of greenhouse cucumber , 1999 .

[10]  D. Hall.  Photosynthesis and production in a changing environment : a field and laboratory manual , 1993 .

[11]  S. Grimstad.  Supplementary lighting of early tomatoes after planting out in glass and acrylic greenhouses , 1987 .

[12]  M. Kasperbauer.  Spectral Distribution of Light in a Tobacco Canopy and Effects of End-of-Day Light Quality on Growth and Development. , 1971, Plant physiology.

[13]  M. Dixon,et al.  Regulating plant/insect interactions using CO2 enrichment in model ecosystems. , 1999, Advances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research.

[14]  S. Adams,et al.  The impact of changing light levels and fruit load on the pattern of tomato yields , 2001 .

[15]  P. Jolliffe,et al.  Training systems affect canopy light exposure and shelf life of long English cucumber , 1993 .

[16]  W. C. Lin,et al.  Light intensity and spectral quality affect fruit growth and shelf life of greenhouse-grown long English cucumber , 1996 .

[17]  J. Proctor,et al.  Estimating photosynthetically active radiation from measured solar irradiance , 1983 .

[18]  J. Janse.  EFFECT OF GROWING METHODS ON THE INCIDENCE OF RUBBER NECKS IN CUCUMBER FRUITS , 1995 .

[19]  M. Dixon,et al.  Increasing plant productivity in closed environments with inner canopy illumination. , 1998, Life support & biosphere science : international journal of earth space.

[20]  M. Saltveit,et al.  Effect of Stage of Development on Postharvest Behavior of Cucumber Fruit , 1986, HortScience.

[21]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[22]  L. Marcelis.  Fruit growth and biomass allocation to the fruits in cucumber. 1. Effect of fruit load and temperature , 1993 .

[23]  K. E. Cockshull,et al.  The influence of shading on yield of glasshouse tomatoes , 1992 .

[24]  Juha Näkkilä,et al.  Interlighting improves production of year-round cucumber , 2004 .

[25]  Leo F. M. Marcelis,et al.  Fruit growth and biomass allocation to the fruits in cucumber. 2. Effect of irradiance , 1993 .

[26]  R. Littell.  SAS System for Mixed Models , 1996 .

[27]  M. Dorais,et al.  PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF GREENHOUSE VEGETABLE CROPS TO SUPPLEMENTAL LIGHTING , 2002 .

[28]  I. Segal,et al.  Greenhouse climate control. , 1990 .