Toward a Holistic Management Perspective

In ecology, as in other scientific disciplines, there are times when certain conceptual and experimental approaches appear to hold special promise for solving specific problems or stimulating great leaps forward in understanding. The ultimate consequences of these quasi-concerted approaches vary. Some scientific fads arise from the ephemeral reclothing of old ideas; they generate interest but little actual improvement in understanding. Other instances clearly represent breakthroughs that change the ways the scientific enterprise is conducted or provide fundamental new understanding. Most popular trends eventually fall between these extremes, producing some new information, perhaps a novel experimental technique, and an incremental increase in our understanding. Indeed, the history of science has only infrequently been punctuated by bursts of real insight or conspicuous episodes of chasing elusive notions up scientific blind alleys. Today, there are several approaches to studying ecosystems under stress, and it remains to be seen which, if any, will produce powerful problem-solving results. For 15 years or more, ecologists have been espousing a "holistic" approach to

[1]  Orie L. Loucks,et al.  Emergence of Research on Agro-Ecosystems , 1977 .

[2]  S. Levin Population Dynamic Models in Heterogeneous Environments , 1976 .

[3]  W. Sousa The Role of Disturbance in Natural Communities , 1984 .

[4]  W. Lauenroth,et al.  Analysis of the Response of a Grassland Ecosystem to Stress , 1979 .

[5]  D. Milchunas,et al.  Impact of SO2 exposure on the response of Agropyron smithii to defoliation. , 1985 .

[6]  D. Correll,et al.  Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: Observations on the role of a riparian forest , 1984 .

[7]  J. T. Callahan Long-Term Ecological Research , 1984 .

[8]  I. Noble,et al.  The Use of Vital Attributes to Predict Successional Changes in Plant Communities Subject to Recurrent Disturbances , 1980 .

[9]  J. E. Weaver,et al.  Effects on the Great Drought on the Prairies of Iowa, Nebraska, and Kansas , 1936 .

[10]  R. Rosenberg,et al.  Stress Effects on Natural Ecosystems , 1981 .

[11]  H. Odum 4 – An Energy Circuit Language for Ecological and Social Systems: Its Physical Basis , 1972 .

[12]  D. L. Haynes,et al.  Closed System Agriculture: Resource Constraints, Management Options, and Design Alternatives , 1982 .

[13]  J. Ellis,et al.  Energy flow and partitioning in selected man-managed and natural ecosystems , 1976 .

[14]  B. Hannon,et al.  Total energy costs in ecosystems. , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  S. McNaughton,et al.  Serengeti Grassland Ecology: The Role of Composite Environmental Factors and Contingency in Community Organization , 1983 .

[16]  Robert A. Herendeen,et al.  Energy intensities in ecological and economic systems , 1981 .

[17]  D. Anderson PROCESSES OF HUMUS FORMATION AND TRANSFORMATION IN SOILS OF THE CANADIAN GREAT PLAINS , 1979 .

[18]  R. Loomis Traditional Agriculture in America , 1984 .

[19]  John T. Finn,et al.  Perturbation Theory and the Subsidy-Stress Gradient , 1979 .

[20]  R. Waring,et al.  Evergreen Coniferous Forests of the Pacific Northwest , 1979, Science.

[21]  H. Shugart,et al.  Energy and Nitrogen Relation for a Macrosiphum Liriodendri (Homoptera: Aphididae) Population in an East Tennessee Liriodendron Tulipifera Stand , 1980 .

[22]  C. S. Holling Resilience of ecosystems: local surprise and global change. , 1985 .

[23]  E. Odum The strategy of ecosystem development. , 1969, Science.