Muscle strain of the hand-arm-shoulder system during typing at conventional and ergonomic keyboards

Manufacturers of ergonomic split keyboards promise maximum effectiveness and comfort as well as a reduction of physical complaints. In order to determine the positive effects claimed, a study was carried out during which 10 male subjects (Ss) participated in standardized working tests. They entered text into a PC, alternatingly using a conventional keyboard and an ergonomic keyboard. Electromyographic activity (EA) of 8 muscle groups was simultaneously recorded during altogether 6 working phases with a duration of 10 min, each. Measurements of the maximum activity, EAmax, via maximum voluntary contractions of the 8 muscles - which were necessary for calculating standardized electromyographic activity (sEA) used to represent muscle strain as a percentage - were always taken at the end of the experiment. Muscle strain varied from muscle to muscle but the level of the sEA-values for the different muscles was reproducible and stable. Also, activation of most muscles acting on the shoulder, upper arm, forearm, and the hand showed differences which, though small in amount, could be statistically secured and associated with the keyboard type. The ergonomic design of the tested keyboard led to objectively verifiable and plausible reductions of muscle strain.

[1]  K H Kroemer.  Human Engineering the Keyboard , 1972, Human factors.

[2]  K H Kroemer,et al.  Preferred line of sight angle. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[3]  Objektivierung des Anlernverhaltens einer Einhand-Akkord-Tastatur für Texteingabe , 1991 .

[4]  W Jaschinski-Kruza,et al.  Eyestrain in VDU Users: Viewing Distance and the Resting Position of Ocular Muscles , 1991, Human factors.

[5]  E Fernström,et al.  Electromyographic activity during typewriter and keyboard use. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[6]  Elaine Serina,et al.  A system for evaluating the effect of keyboard design on force , 1994 .

[7]  Leo A. Smith,et al.  An ergonomic evaluation of the Kinesis Ergonomic Computer Keyboard , 1994 .

[8]  Helmut Strasser.  Ergonomic efforts aiming at compatibility in work design for realizing preventive occupational health and safety , 1995 .

[9]  K.-W. Müller.  Effects of Ergonomic Keyboards on Static and Dynamic Components of Electromyographic Activity , 1996 .

[10]  C S Pan,et al.  The impact of keyboard design on comfort and productivity in a text-entry task. , 1997, Applied ergonomics.

[11]  E. Peper,et al.  Surface electromyography and mouse use position. , 1997, Ergonomics.

[12]  Helmut Strasser,et al.  Electromyographic and subjective evaluation of a wrist rest for VDT operators , 1998 .

[13]  H Kylian,et al.  A procedure to determine the individually comfortable position of visual displays relative to the eyes. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[14]  E R Serina,et al.  Wrist and forearm postures and motions during typing. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[15]  A Zecevic,et al.  An evaluation of the ergonomics of three computer keyboards , 2000, Ergonomics.

[16]  H. Strasser,et al.  Electromyographic Methods for the Measurement of Physiological Costs Associated with Operating Hand-Held Tools and Computer Input Devices , 2000 .

[17]  Karl H.E. Kroemer,et al.  Keyboards and keying An annotated bibliography of the literature from 1878 to 1999 , 2001, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[18]  Helmut Strasser,et al.  Estimated and experienced subjective assessment of the ergonomic quality of a keyboard , 2004 .