Sonication of Vascular Grafts and Endografts to Diagnose Vascular Graft Infection: a Head-To-Head Comparison with Conventional Culture and Its Clinical Impact

Sonication culture of explanted vascular grafts was shown to be a noninferior method compared to conventional culturing in diagnosing vascular graft and endograft infection (VGEI). Moreover, sonication culture has probable additional value in microbiological characterization of VGEI by giving more detailed information on growth densities, especially when the conventional culture shows intermediate growth. ABSTRACT Vascular graft and endograft infection (VGEI) is a severe complication associated with high mortality and is often challenging to diagnose. For the definitive microbiological diagnosis, sonication of vascular grafts may increase the microbiological yield of these biofilm-associated infections. The objective of this study was to determine whether sonication of explanted vascular grafts and endografts results in a higher diagnostic accuracy than conventional culture methods and aids in clinical decision-making. A prospective diagnostic study was performed comparing conventional culture with sonication culture of explanted vascular grafts in patients treated for VGEI. Explanted (endo)grafts were cut in halves and were either subjected to sonication or conventional culture. Criteria based on the Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC) case definition of VGEI were used for definitive diagnosis. The relevance of sonication cultures was assessed by expert opinion to determine the clinical impact on decision-making. Fifty-seven vascular (endo)graft samples from 36 patients (four reoperations; 40 episodes) treated for VGEI were included; 32 episodes were diagnosed with VGEI. Both methods showed a positive culture in 81% of the cases. However, sonication culture detected clinically relevant microorganisms that went unnoticed by conventional culturing in 9 out of 57 samples (16%, 8 episodes) and provided additional relevant information regarding growth densities in another 11 samples (19%, 10 episodes). Sonication of explanted vascular grafts and endografts improves the microbiological yield and aids in the clinical decision-making for patients with a suspected VGEI compared to conventional culture alone. IMPORTANCE Sonication culture of explanted vascular grafts was shown to be a noninferior method compared to conventional culturing in diagnosing vascular graft and endograft infection (VGEI). Moreover, sonication culture has probable additional value in microbiological characterization of VGEI by giving more detailed information on growth densities, especially when the conventional culture shows intermediate growth. In this prospective design, for the first time, a direct comparison is made between sonication culturing and conventional culturing in VGEI, while taking clinical interpretation into account. Therefore, this study is another step toward a more accurate microbiological diagnosis of VGEI, influencing clinical decision-making.

[1]  M. Venditti,et al.  Challenges in the Microbiological Diagnosis of Implant-Associated Infections: A Summary of the Current Knowledge , 2021, Frontiers in Microbiology.

[2]  P. Kolh,et al.  Editor's Choice – European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Vascular Graft and Endograft Infections , 2020 .

[3]  P. Kolh,et al.  European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Vascular Graft and Stent Graft Infections With the Endorsement of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). , 2020, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[4]  M. Dupon,et al.  Comparison of Genus Specific PCR and Culture with or without Sonication for Microbiological Diagnosis of Vascular Graft Infection. , 2018, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[5]  E. Natour,et al.  Sonication of heart valves detects more bacteria in infective endocarditis , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[6]  S. Jeverica,et al.  Contribution of sonicate-fluid cultures and broad-range PCR to microbiological diagnosis in vascular graft infections , 2018, Infectious diseases.

[7]  Jiying Chen,et al.  Meta-analysis of sonication prosthetic fluid PCR for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection , 2018, PloS one.

[8]  A. Trampuz,et al.  Performance of automated multiplex PCR using sonication fluid for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a prospective cohort , 2017, Infection.

[9]  B. Klatt,et al.  Sonication of Arthroplasty Implants Improves Accuracy of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Cultures , 2017, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  B. Modarai,et al.  Diagnosis of Aortic Graft Infection: A Case Definition by the Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC). , 2016, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[11]  V. Vullo,et al.  Role of Sonication in the Microbiological Diagnosis of Implant-Associated Infections: Beyond the Orthopedic Prosthesis. , 2015, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[12]  T. Rawson,et al.  Microbiological characterisation of prosthetic vascular graft infection. , 2015, The Journal of infection.

[13]  M. Battegay,et al.  Surgical and Antimicrobial Treatment of Prosthetic Vascular Graft Infections at Different Surgical Sites: A Retrospective Study of Treatment Outcomes , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  A. Alier,et al.  Advantages of sonication fluid culture for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. , 2014, The Journal of infection.

[15]  A. Qin,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Sonication Fluid Samples from Prosthetic Components for Diagnosis of Infection after Total Joint Arthroplasty , 2014, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[16]  N. Bisharat,et al.  Prosthetic Vascular Graft Infections Between Blood and Concordance of Graft Culture Pathogen , 2012, The American journal of the medical sciences.

[17]  S. Haulon,et al.  Characteristics and prognosis in patients with prosthetic vascular graft infection: a prospective observational cohort study. , 2012, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[18]  S. Haulon,et al.  Diagnosis and management of prosthetic vascular graft infections. , 2012, Medecine et maladies infectieuses.

[19]  P. Devos,et al.  Vascular graft infections in the intensive care unit: clinical spectrum and prognostic factors. , 2011, The Journal of infection.

[20]  C. Zeebregts,et al.  Conservative treatment of vascular prosthetic graft infection is associated with high mortality. , 2010, American journal of surgery.

[21]  J. Greenleaf,et al.  Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  H. Humphreys,et al.  Diagnosis and treatment of prosthetic aortic graft infections: confusion and inconsistency in the absence of evidence or consensus. , 2005, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[23]  D. Bandyk,et al.  Identification of Staphylococcus epidermidis vascular graft infections: a comparison of culture techniques. , 1989, Journal of vascular surgery.

[24]  G. Seabrook,et al.  Surface biofilm disruption. Enhanced recovery of microorganisms from vascular prostheses. , 1987, Archives of surgery.