Statistical root cause analysis of novel faults based on digraph models

Abstract This paper investigates the challenging problem of diagnosing novel faults whose fault mechanisms and relevant historical data are not available. Most existing fault diagnosis systems are incapable to explain root causes for unanticipated, novel faults, because they rely on either models or historical data of known faulty conditions. To address this issue we propose a new framework for novel fault diagnosis, which integrates causal reasoning on signed digraph models with multivariate statistical process monitoring. The prerequisites for our approach include historical data of normal process behavior and qualitative cause–effect relationships that can be derived from process flow diagrams. In this new approach, a set of candidate root nodes is identified first via qualitative reasoning on signed digraph; then quantitative local consistency tests are implemented for each candidate based on multivariate statistical process monitoring techniques; finally, using the resulting multiple local residuals, diagnosis is performed based on the exoneration principle. The cause–effect relationships in the digraph enable automatic variable selection and the local residual interpretations for statistical monitoring. The effectiveness of this new approach is demonstrated using numerical examples based on the Tennessee Eastman process data.

[1]  Ning Lü,et al.  Fault Diagnosis Based on Signed Digraph Combined with Dynamic Kernel PLS and SVR , 2008 .

[2]  Luis Puigjaner,et al.  Integration of principal component analysis and fuzzy logic systems for comprehensive process fault detection and diagnosis , 2006 .

[3]  Jose A. Romagnoli,et al.  An integration mechanism for multivariate knowledge-based fault diagnosis , 2002 .

[4]  David Zumoffen,et al.  From Large Chemical Plant Data to Fault Diagnosis Integrated to Decentralized Fault-Tolerant Control : Pulp Mill Process Application , 2008 .

[5]  Stéphane Ploix,et al.  Causal fault detection and isolation based on a set-membership approach , 2004, Autom..

[6]  Sachin C. Patwardhan,et al.  A possibilistic clustering approach to novel fault detection and isolation , 2006 .

[7]  Si-Zhao Joe Qin,et al.  Reconstruction-based contribution for process monitoring , 2009, Autom..

[8]  Marcel Staroswiecki,et al.  Conflicts versus analytical redundancy relations: a comparative analysis of the model based diagnosis approach from the artificial intelligence and automatic control perspectives , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[9]  Ali Cinar,et al.  Real-time batch process supervision by integrated knowledge-based systems and multivariate statistical methods , 2003 .

[10]  Raghunathan Rengaswamy,et al.  An integrated qualitative-quantitative hypothesis driven approach for comprehensive fault diagnosis , 2007 .

[11]  Claire Palmer,et al.  Creating signed directed graph models for process plants , 1999 .

[12]  Raghunathan Rengaswamy,et al.  Application of signed digraphs-based analysis for fault diagnosis of chemical process flowsheets , 2004, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[13]  Nina F. Thornhill,et al.  Cause-and-effect analysis in chemical processes utilizing XML, plant connectivity and quantitative process history , 2009, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[14]  Christos Georgakis,et al.  Disturbance detection and isolation by dynamic principal component analysis , 1995 .

[15]  Janos Gertler,et al.  Fault detection and diagnosis in engineering systems , 1998 .

[16]  Raghunathan Rengaswamy,et al.  A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: Part I: Quantitative model-based methods , 2003, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[17]  U. Kruger,et al.  Dynamic Principal Component Analysis Using Subspace Model Identification , 2005, ICIC.

[18]  S. Joe Qin,et al.  Consistent dynamic PCA based on errors-in-variables subspace identification , 2001 .

[19]  Richard D. Braatz,et al.  Data-driven Methods for Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Chemical Processes , 2000 .

[20]  Gibaek Lee,et al.  Multiple-Fault Diagnosis of the Tennessee Eastman Process Based on System Decomposition and Dynamic PLS , 2004 .

[21]  Venkat Venkatasubramanian,et al.  Signed Digraph based Multiple Fault Diagnosis , 1997 .

[22]  Hui Cheng,et al.  Fault Diagnosis of the Paper Machine Short Circulation Process using Novel Dynamic Causal Digraph Reasoning , 2008 .

[23]  S. Joe Qin,et al.  Statistical process monitoring: basics and beyond , 2003 .

[24]  Venkat Venkatasubramanian,et al.  PCA-SDG based process monitoring and fault diagnosis , 1999 .

[25]  Raghunathan Rengaswamy,et al.  A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: Part III: Process history based methods , 2003, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[26]  E. F. Vogel,et al.  A plant-wide industrial process control problem , 1993 .

[27]  Jin Cao,et al.  PCA-based fault diagnosis in the presence of control and dynamics , 2004 .

[28]  Jacky Montmain,et al.  Dynamic causal model diagnostic reasoning for online technical process supervision , 2000, Autom..

[29]  Raghunathan Rengaswamy,et al.  A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: Part II: Qualitative models and search strategies , 2003, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[30]  S. Gentil,et al.  Combining FDI and AI approaches within causal-model-based diagnosis , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).