A COMPARISON OF TRANSIENT INFINITE ELEMENTS AND TRANSIENT KIRCHHOFF INTEGRAL METHODS FOR FAR FIELD ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS

Finite element analysis of transient acoustic phenomena on unbounded exterior domains is very common in engineering analysis. In these problems there is a common need to compute the acoustic pressure at points outside of the acoustic mesh, since meshing to points of interest is impractical in many scenarios. In aeroacoustic calculations, for example, the acoustic pressure may be required at tens or hundreds of meters from the structure. In these cases, a method is needed for post-processing the acoustic results to compute the response at far-field points. In this paper, we compare two methods for computing far-field acoustic pressures, one derived directly from the infinite element solution, and the other from the transient version of the Kirchhoff integral. We show that the infinite element approach alleviates the large storage requirements that are typical of Kirchhoff integral and related procedures, and also does not suffer from loss of accuracy that is an inherent part of computing numerical derivatives in the Kirchhoff integral. In order to further speed up and streamline the process of computing the acoustic response at points outside of the mesh, we also address the nonlinear iterative procedure needed for locating parametric coordinates within the host infinite element of far-field points, the parallelization of the overall process, linear solver requirements, and system stability considerations.

[1]  O. Widlund,et al.  Hybrid domain decomposition algorithms for compressible and almost incompressible elasticity , 2009 .

[2]  T. L. Geers,et al.  A residual-potential boundary for time-dependent, infinite-domain problems in computational acoustics. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  R. J. Astley,et al.  Conditioning of infinite element schemes for wave problems , 2001 .

[4]  R. J. Astley.  TRANSIENT WAVE ENVELOPE ELEMENTS FOR WAVE PROBLEMS , 1996 .

[5]  R. P. Ingel,et al.  Stabilizing the retarded potential method for transient fluid–structure interaction problems , 1997 .

[6]  H. Carter Edwards,et al.  Managing complexity in massively parallel, adaptive, multiphysics applications , 2006, Engineering with Computers.

[7]  O. von Estorff,et al.  Improved conditioning of infinite elements for exterior acoustics , 2003 .

[8]  O. Widlund,et al.  A family of energy minimizing coarse spaces for overlapping schwarz preconditioners , 2008 .

[9]  Kristine R. Meadows,et al.  TOWARDS A HIGHLY ACCURATE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE KIRCHHOFF APPROACH FOR COMPUTATIONAL AEROACOUSTICS , 1996 .

[10]  Barry F. Smith,et al.  Domain Decomposition: Parallel Multilevel Methods for Elliptic Partial Differential Equations , 1996 .

[11]  S. Tsynkov.  Numerical solution of problems on unbounded domains. a review , 1998 .

[12]  A. Lyrintzis.  Review: the use of Kirchhoff's method in computational aeroacoustics , 1994 .

[13]  David S. Burnett,et al.  A three‐dimensional acoustic infinite element based on a prolate spheroidal multipole expansion , 1994 .

[14]  L. Demkowicz,et al.  A few new (?) facts about infinite elements , 2006 .

[15]  J. A. Hamilton,et al.  The stability of infinite element schemes for transient wave problems , 2006 .

[16]  Marcus J. Grote,et al.  Exact Nonreflecting Boundary Conditions for the Time Dependent Wave Equation , 1995, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[17]  Barry F. Smith,et al.  Schwarz analysis of iterative substructuring algorithms for elliptic problems in three dimensions , 1994 .

[18]  R. Astley.  Infinite elements for wave problems: a review of current formulations and an assessment of accuracy , 2000 .

[19]  S. Marburg,et al.  Computational acoustics of noise propagation in fluids : finite and boudary element methods , 2008 .

[20]  Leszek Demkowicz,et al.  Solution of 3D-Laplace and Helmholtz equations in exterior domains using hp-infinite elements , 1996 .

[21]  K. Mitzner,et al.  Numerical Solution for Transient Scattering from a Hard Surface of Arbitrary Shape—Retarded Potential Technique , 1967 .

[22]  Youn-sik Park,et al.  New approximations of external acoustic–structural interactions: Derivation and evaluation , 2009 .

[23]  Jean-Pierre Berenger,et al.  A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves , 1994 .

[24]  R. J. Astley,et al.  Three-dimensional wave-envelope elements of variable order for acoustic radiation and scattering. Part I. Formulation in the frequency domain , 1998 .

[25]  David S. Burnett,et al.  An ellipsoidal acoustic infinite element , 1998 .

[26]  J. Cipolla,et al.  INFINITE ELEMENTS IN THE TIME DOMAIN USING A PROLATE SPHEROIDAL MULTIPOLE EXPANSION , 1998 .

[27]  Olof B. Widlund,et al.  An Overlapping Schwarz Algorithm for Almost Incompressible Elasticity , 2009, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[28]  K. Gerdes,et al.  A REVIEW OF INFINITE ELEMENT METHODS FOR EXTERIOR HELMHOLTZ PROBLEMS , 2000 .

[29]  Karl Meerbergen,et al.  Time integration for spherical acoustic finite–infinite element models , 2005 .

[30]  L. Thompson,et al.  Computation of far-field solutions based on exact nonreflecting boundary conditions for the time-dependent wave equation , 2000 .