Stellar halo hierarchical density structure identification using (F)OPTICS

Context. The stellar halo holds some of the best preserved fossils of Galactic formation history that can be detected as overdensities. The detection and analysis of merger by-products within the halo enables the reconstruction of the accretion history of the Milky Way. Upcoming large-scale all-sky surveys such as Gaia and The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) will provide a huge and rich data set, which at the same time poses challenges for automated halo debris detection. Aims. We investigate the overdensity detection algorithm Ordering Points To Identify the Clustering Structure (OPTICS) as a method to identify tidal debris in the Galactic halo with large-scale surveys, as well as the variant F OPTICS which is capable of handling data sets with multi-dimensional uncertainty ellipsoids. Methods. We applied OPTICS to the a simulated Galactic stellar Halo to assess the detection performance. Additionally, we tested the performance of F OPTICS is tested by introducing uncertainty ellipsoids to the 6D phase space of two test cases. We present the Jaccard index as an alternative way to test the stability of halo debris overdensity detections without the need for a local background density estimate. Results. We optimized the OPTICS overdensity detection algorithm so that it has a slightly superlinear run-time complexity, making the method suitable for large-scale surveys. Our test on a mock galactic halo in 6D phase space shows an excellent capability to not only detect the compact dense clusters, but also the larger streams that cover a significant part of the sky. The output of OPTICS, the so-called 2D reachability diagram, proved to be a very useful tool to grasp the size, density, and substructure of the overdensities without needing to resort to complex projections of the 6D phase space. Using F OPTICS, we show the effects of introducing uncertainty ellipsoids in the 6D phase space on the retrieved tidal streams, and how the detectability of a cluster depends on whether its size and density is sufficiently large to overcome the effects of the uncertainties on the attributes.

[1]  V. Springel,et al.  Phase‐space structures – II. Hierarchical Structure Finder , 2008, 0812.0288.

[2]  M. Irwin,et al.  A dwarf satellite galaxy in Sagittarius , 1994, Nature.

[3]  C. Fabricius,et al.  Gaia broad band photometry , 2010, 1008.0815.

[4]  Michael S. Bessell,et al.  SkyMapper and the Southern Sky Survey , 2008 .

[5]  J. Bullock,et al.  Λ Cold Dark Matter, Stellar Feedback, and the Galactic Halo Abundance Pattern , 2008 .

[6]  Padova,et al.  Populating a cluster of galaxies - I. Results at z=0 , 2000, astro-ph/0012055.

[7]  Michael A. Perryman,et al.  GAIA: An Astrometric and Photometric Survey of our Galaxy , 2002 .

[8]  Kathryn V. Johnston,et al.  Phase-space distributions of chemical abundances in Milky Way-type Galaxy halos. , 2005 .

[9]  Michael Kuhlen,et al.  Early Supersymmetric Cold Dark Matter Substructure , 2006 .

[10]  R. Wechsler,et al.  THE AVERAGE STAR FORMATION HISTORIES OF GALAXIES IN DARK MATTER HALOS FROM z = 0–8 , 2012, 1207.6105.

[11]  Amina Helmi,et al.  The stellar halo of the Galaxy , 2008, 0804.0019.

[12]  Michal Maciejewski,et al.  Haloes gone MAD: The Halo-Finder Comparison Project , 2011, 1104.0949.

[13]  S. C. Keller,et al.  The SkyMapper Telescope and The Southern Sky Survey , 2007, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia.

[14]  Iven Van Mechelen,et al.  On the Added Value of Bootstrap Analysis for K-Means Clustering , 2015, Journal of Classification.

[15]  F. Pearce,et al.  Streams going Notts: the tidal debris finder comparison project , 2013, 1305.2448.

[16]  Brant Robertson,et al.  Chemical Abundance Distributions of Galactic Halos and Their Satellite Systems in a ΛCDM Universe , 2006 .

[17]  Zhiyong Lu,et al.  Automatic Extraction of Clusters from Hierarchical Clustering Representations , 2003, PAKDD.

[18]  Christian Hennig,et al.  Cluster-wise assessment of cluster stability , 2007, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[19]  Kathryn V. Johnston,et al.  Fossil Signatures of Ancient Accretion Events in the Halo , 1995 .

[20]  Kathryn V. Johnston,et al.  Tracing Galaxy Formation with Stellar Halos. I. Methods , 2005 .

[21]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  OPTICS: ordering points to identify the clustering structure , 1999, SIGMOD '99.

[22]  K. Johnston,et al.  A GROUP FINDING ALGORITHM FOR MULTIDIMENSIONAL DATA SETS , 2009 .

[23]  Hans-Joachim Mucha,et al.  Resampling Techniques in Cluster Analysis: Is Subsampling Better Than Bootstrapping? , 2013, ECDA.

[24]  D. Weinberg,et al.  Hierarchical Galaxy Formation and Substructure in the Galaxy’s Stellar Halo , 2000, astro-ph/0007295.

[25]  Lars Hernquist,et al.  Λ Cold Dark Matter, Stellar Feedback, and the Galactic Halo Abundance Pattern , 2005, astro-ph/0501398.

[26]  Thomas L. Sterling,et al.  Halo World: Tools for Parallel Cluster Finding in Astrophysical N-body Simulations , 1997, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[27]  J. H. J. de Bruijne,et al.  Science performance of Gaia, ESA’s space-astrometry mission , 2012, 1201.3238.