Adding access blood flow surveillance to clinical monitoring reduces thrombosis rates and costs, and improves fistula patency in the short term: a controlled cohort study.

BACKGROUND Access blood flow (Qa) measurement is the recommended method for fistula (AVF) surveillance for stenosis, but whether it may be beneficial and cost-effective is controversial. METHODS We conducted a 5-year controlled cohort study to evaluate whether adding Qa surveillance to unsystematic clinical monitoring (combined with elective stenosis repair) reduces thrombosis and access loss rates, and costs in mature AVFs. We prospectively collected data in 159 haemodialysis patients with mature AVFs, 97 followed by unsystematic clinical monitoring (Control) and 62 by adding Qa surveillance to monitoring (Flow). Indications for imaging and stenosis repair were clinically evident access dysfunction in both groups and a Qa < 750 ml/min or dropping by >20% in Flow. RESULTS Adding Qa surveillance prompted an increase in access imaging (HR 2.96, 95% CI 1.79-4.91, P < 0.001), stenosis detection (HR 2.55, 95% CI 1.48-4.42, P = 0.001) and elective repair (HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.16-4.43, P = 0.017), and a reduction in thromboses (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.09-0.79, P = 0.017), central venous catheter placements (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.42, P = 0.010) and access losses (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.11-1.09, P = 0.071). In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, adding Qa surveillance only extended short-term cumulative patency (P = 0.037 in the Breslow test). Mean access-related costs were 1213 Euro/AVF-year in Control and 743 in Flow (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our controlled cohort study shows that adding Qa surveillance to monitoring in mature AVFs is associated with a better detection and elective treatment of stenosis, and lower thrombosis rates and access-related costs, although the cumulative access patency was only extended in the first 3 years after fistula maturation. We are aware of the limitations of our study (non-randomization and the possible centre effect) and that further, better-designed trials are needed to arrive at a definitive answer concerning the role of Qa surveillance for fistulae.

[1]  M. Riella,et al.  Accuracy of Physical Examination and Intra‐Access Pressure in the Detection of Stenosis in Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistula , 2008, Seminars in dialysis.

[2]  B. Manns,et al.  Economic implications of screening strategies in arteriovenous fistulae. , 2006, Kidney international.

[3]  James F. Watkins,et al.  Analysing Survival Data from Clinical Trials and Observational Studies. , 1995 .

[4]  B. Dixon,et al.  Monthly access flow monitoring with increased prophylactic angioplasty did not improve fistula patency. , 2005, Kidney international.

[5]  D Curran-Everett,et al.  Fundamental concepts in statistics: elucidation and illustration. , 1998, Journal of applied physiology.

[6]  F. Port,et al.  Tailoring the initial vascular access for dialysis patients. , 2002, Kidney international.

[7]  F. Lopot,et al.  Vascular Access Monitoring: Methods and Procedures – Something to Standardize? , 2004, Blood Purification.

[8]  G. Beathard,et al.  Effectiveness and safety of dialysis vascular access procedures performed by interventional nephrologists , 2005 .

[9]  L. Salman,et al.  Accuracy of physical examination in the detection of arteriovenous fistula stenosis. , 2007, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[10]  R. Atkins,et al.  Does monthly native arteriovenous fistula blood-flow surveillance detect significant stenosis--a randomized controlled trial. , 2006, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[11]  J. Concato,et al.  Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  D. Blanchard,et al.  Treatment of stenosis and thrombosis in haemodialysis fistulas and grafts by interventional radiology. , 2000, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[13]  T A Ikizler,et al.  Vascular access blood flow monitoring reduces access morbidity and costs. , 2001, Kidney international.

[14]  A. Lupo,et al.  Outcomes of surgical revision of stenosed and thrombosed forearm arteriovenous fistulae for haemodialysis. , 2007, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[15]  R. Roca-Tey,et al.  [Vascular access surveillance with blood flow monitoring: a prospective study with 65 patients]. , 2004, Nefrología.

[16]  Antonio Lupo,et al.  Can blood flow surveillance and pre-emptive repair of subclinical stenosis prolong the useful life of arteriovenous fistulae? A randomized controlled study. , 2004, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[17]  M. Oliver,et al.  Hemodialysis arteriovenous access: detection of stenosis and response to treatment by vascular access blood flow. , 2001, Kidney international.

[18]  Sands Jj,et al.  Intervention based on monthly monitoring decreases hemodialysis access thrombosis. , 1999 .

[19]  R. Croxford,et al.  Reducing vascular access morbidity: a comparative trial of two vascular access monitoring strategies. , 2003, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[20]  K. Leunissen,et al.  Impact of a quality improvement programme based on vascular access flow monitoring on costs, access occlusion and access failure. , 2006, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[21]  J. Sands,et al.  Intervention based on monthly monitoring decreases hemodialysis access thrombosis. , 1999, ASAIO journal.

[22]  M. Allon,et al.  Vascular access stenosis: comparison of arteriovenous grafts and fistulas. , 2004, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[23]  J. Éthier,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. , 2006, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[24]  D. Marcelli,et al.  Vascular access surgery managed by renal physicians: the choice of native arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. , 2002, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[25]  K. Kent,et al.  Recommended standards for reports dealing with arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[26]  A. Lupo,et al.  Endovascular versus surgical preemptive repair of forearm arteriovenous fistula juxta-anastomotic stenosis: analysis of data collected prospectively from 1999 to 2004. , 2006, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[27]  Giovanni Morana,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound dilution access blood flow measurement in detecting stenosis and predicting thrombosis in native forearm arteriovenous fistulae for hemodialysis. , 2003, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.