Label Fusion Strategy Selection

Label fusion is used in medical image segmentation to combine several different labels of the same entity into a single discrete label, potentially more accurate, with respect to the exact, sought segmentation, than the best input element. Using simulated data, we compared three existing label fusion techniques—STAPLE, Voting, and Shape-Based Averaging (SBA)—and observed that none could be considered superior depending on the dissimilarity between the input elements. We thus developed an empirical, hybrid technique called SVS, which selects the most appropriate technique to apply based on this dissimilarity. We evaluated the label fusion strategies on two- and three-dimensional simulated data and showed that SVS is superior to any of the three existing methods examined. On real data, we used SVS to perform fusions of 10 segmentations of the hippocampus and amygdala in 78 subjects from the ICBM dataset. SVS selected SBA in almost all cases, which was the most appropriate method overall.

[1]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Multi-classifier framework for atlas-based image segmentation , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004..

[2]  Jean-Claude Baron,et al.  Early diagnosis of alzheimer’s disease: contribution of structural neuroimaging , 2003, NeuroImage.

[3]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  A Probabilistic Atlas of the Human Brain: Theory and Rationale for Its Development The International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM) , 1995, NeuroImage.

[4]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[5]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Performance-based classifier combination in atlas-based image segmentation using expectation-maximization parameter estimation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  William M. Wells,et al.  Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  R. Coleman,et al.  Neuroimaging and early diagnosis of Alzheimer disease: a look to the future. , 2003, Radiology.

[8]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Age and Gender Predict Volume Decline in the Anterior and Posterior Hippocampus in Early Adulthood , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  William M. Wells,et al.  Validation of Image Segmentation and Expert Quality with an Expectation-Maximization Algorithm , 2002, MICCAI.

[10]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Towards accurate, automatic segmentation of the hippocampus and amygdala from MRI by augmenting ANIMAL with a template library and label fusion , 2010, NeuroImage.

[11]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Expectation Maximization Strategies for Multi-atlas Multi-label Segmentation , 2003, IPMI.

[12]  Dominique Hasboun,et al.  Anatomically constrained region deformation for the automated segmentation of the hippocampus and the amygdala: Method and validation on controls and patients with Alzheimer’s disease , 2007, NeuroImage.

[13]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Automatic calculation of hippocampal atrophy rates using a hippocampal template and the boundary shift integral , 2007, Neurobiology of Aging.

[14]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Evaluation of atlas selection strategies for atlas-based image segmentation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains , 2004, NeuroImage.

[15]  Carlos Ortiz-de-Solorzano,et al.  Combination Strategies in Multi-Atlas Image Segmentation: Application to Brain MR Data , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Shape-Based Averaging , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Clifford R Jack,et al.  Neuroimaging in Alzheimer disease: an evidence-based review. , 2003, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[18]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: Atlas selection and its effect on accuracy , 2009, NeuroImage.

[19]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  A Generative Model for Image Segmentation Based on Label Fusion , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion , 2006, NeuroImage.

[21]  Gunhild Waldemar,et al.  Evidence-based Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Diagnostic Tool in Dementia Workup , 2005, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.