Societal Implications of Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering

................................................................................................................................. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................................... iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ..............................................................................................................v LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................... vii

[1]  Detlof von Winterfeldt,et al.  Framing Earthquake Retrofitting Decisions: The Case of Hillside Homes in Los Angeles , 2000 .

[2]  P. May,et al.  State Environmental Policies: Analyzing Green Building Mandates , 2007 .

[3]  Chris Koski,et al.  Performance-Based Regulation and Regulatory Regimes , 2004 .

[4]  Jonathan D. Bray,et al.  Characterization of Site Response General Site Categories , 1999 .

[5]  M. Ferguson.  Chief Executive Success in the Legislative Arena , 2003, State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

[6]  Nicholas E. Flores,et al.  Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence , 2000 .

[7]  Beth Tubbs.  ICC Performance Code for Buildings and Facilities—Structural Fire Protection Provisions , 2001 .

[8]  Pacific Earthquake.  A Technical Framework for Probability-Based Demand and Capacity Factor Design (DCFD) Seismic Formats , 2003 .

[9]  Nicolas Luco,et al.  Advanced Seismic Assessment Guidelines , 2004 .

[10]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  Further Studies on Seismic Interaction in Interconnected Electrical Substation Equipment , 2000 .

[11]  Peter J. May,et al.  State Regulatory Roles: Choices in the Regulation of Building Safety , 1997 .

[12]  Ross W. Boulanger,et al.  Inelastic Seismic Response of Extended Pile-Shaft-Supported Bridge Structures , 2004 .

[13]  Harry W. Richardson,et al.  Economic-Engineering Integrated Models for Earthquakes: Socioeconomic Impacts , 2002 .

[14]  Kincho H. Law,et al.  Software Framework for Collaborative Development of Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis Program , 2003 .

[15]  Eduardo Miranda,et al.  Probabilistic Response Assessment for Building-Specific Loss Estimation , 2003 .

[16]  Pacific Earthquake,et al.  Empirical Evaluation of Inertial Soil-Structure Interaction Effects , 1998 .

[17]  Cynthia J. Bowling,et al.  Divided Government, Interest Representation, and Policy Differences: Competing Explanations of Gridlock in the Fifty States , 2001, The Journal of Politics.

[18]  Branco Ponomariov,et al.  Earthquake Mitigation Decisions and Consequences , 2006 .

[19]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Vector-valued ground motion intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand analysis , 2005 .

[20]  James L. Beck,et al.  Investigation of Sensitivity of Building Loss Estimates to Major Uncertain Variables for the Van Nuys Testbed , 2002 .

[21]  Richard O. Zerbe,et al.  Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Decisions , 2022 .

[22]  Brian J. Meacham,et al.  Performance-based building regulation: current situation and future needs , 2005 .

[23]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Capacity-Demand-Diagram Methods for Estimating Seismic Deformation of Inelastic Structures: SDF Systems , 1999 .

[24]  Eugene A. Rosa,et al.  Organizations, Uncertainties, and Risk. , 1992 .

[25]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of 230-kV Porcelain Transformer Bushings , 2001 .

[26]  J. Kelly.  Analysis of Fiber-Reinforced Elastomeric Isolators , 1999 .

[27]  D. Okrent.  The safety goals of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. , 1987, Science.

[28]  Vivian Loftness,et al.  Education and environmental performance-based design: a Carnegie Mellon perspective , 2005 .

[29]  Peter J. May,et al.  Societal Perspectives about Earthquake Performance: The Fallacy of “Acceptable Risk” , 2001 .

[30]  Robb E.S. Moss,et al.  CPT-Based Probabilistic Assessment of Seismic Soil Liquefaction Initiation. , 2003 .

[31]  B. Bolt,et al.  Balance of Risks and Benefits in Preparation for Earthquakes , 1991, Science.

[32]  W. P. Browne.  Policymaking in the American States , 1987 .

[33]  Thomas W. Hoekstra,et al.  The Costs and Financial Benefits of Green Buildings , 2002 .

[34]  Raymond J. Burby,et al.  Policy Design for Earthquake Hazard Mitigation: Lessons from Energy Conservation, Radon Reduction, and Termite Control , 1998 .

[35]  Peter J. May,et al.  Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Organizational and Societal Considerations for Performance-based Earthquake Engineering Organizational and Societal Considerations for Performance-based Earthquake Engineering , 2022 .

[36]  L. Lowes,et al.  A Beam-Column Joint Model for Simulating the Earthquake Response of Reinforced Concrete Frames , 2004 .

[37]  M. O'hare,et al.  Searching for Safety , 1990 .

[38]  Peter J. May,et al.  Design Professions and Earthquake Policy , 1992 .

[39]  E. Miller.  Advancing Comparative State Policy Research: Toward Conceptual Integration and Methodological Expansion , 2004 .

[40]  Brian J. Gerber,et al.  Regulatory Policymaking in the American States: A Review of Theories and Evidence , 2000 .

[41]  Jeryl L. Mumpower.  Public reactions to nuclear waste: Citizens' views of repository siting, edited by Riley E. Dunlap, Michael E. Kraft, and Eugene A. Rosa. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1993, 332 pp., $24.95 paper , 1995 .

[42]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  “Acceptable risk”: The case of nuclear power , 1983 .

[43]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND COMPUTATIONAL EVALUATION OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE BEAM-COLUMN CONNECTIONS FOR SEISMIC PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[44]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Amplification Factors for Spectral Acceleration in Active Regions , 2002 .

[45]  Gregory L Fenves,et al.  BEHAVIOR AND FAILURE ANALYSIS OF A MULTIPLE-FRAME HIGHWAY BRIDGE IN THE 1994 NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE , 1998 .

[46]  Marc O. Eberhard,et al.  Damage to Bridges during the 2001 Nisqually Earthquake , 2001 .

[47]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Uncertainty Specification and Propagation for Loss Estimation Using FOSM Methods , 2003 .

[48]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  Probabilistic Models and Fragility Estimates for Bridge Components and Systems , 2002 .

[49]  Martin Sexton,et al.  Performance-based building and innovation: balancing client and industry needs , 2005 .

[50]  M. Elisabeth Paté-Cornell.  Quantitative safety goals for risk management of industrial facilities , 1994 .

[51]  Charles W. Roeder,et al.  Seismic Performance of Pile-Wharf Connections , 2005 .

[52]  Pacific Earthquake,et al.  Barriers to Adoption and Implementation of PBEE Innovations , 2002 .

[53]  Helmut Krawinkler,et al.  Van Nuys Hotel Building Testbed Report: Exercising Seismic Performance Assessment , 2005 .

[54]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Perceived risk, trust, and democracy , 1993 .

[55]  Gregory L. Fenves,et al.  Ground Motions for Earthquake Simulator Qualification of Electrical Substation Equipment , 2005 .

[56]  Eugene A. Rosa,et al.  Public reactions to nuclear waste : citizens' views of repository siting , 1994 .

[57]  Lawrence D. Reaveley,et al.  Performance-Based Evaluation of Exterior Reinforced Concrete Building Joints for Seismic Excitation , 2000 .

[58]  Ufuk INCE,et al.  SEISMIC HAZARD MITIGATION DECISIONS USING PBEE: FINANCIAL METRICS AND A CASE STUDY , 2002 .

[59]  Pacific Earthquake,et al.  Rocking Response and Overturning of Anchored Equipment under Seismic Excitations , 1999 .

[60]  L. Ibarra.  Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations , 2003 .

[61]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Statistics of SDF-System Estimate of Roof Displacement for Pushover Analysis of Buildings , 2001 .

[62]  James M. Kelly,et al.  Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Analytical and Experimental Study of Fiber-Reinforced Elastomeric Isolators , 2003 .

[63]  I. Spectra.  Consortium of Organizations for Strong-Motion Observation Systems , 2005 .

[64]  Vivian Loftness †,et al.  Education and environmental performance-based design: a Carnegie Mellon perspective , 2005 .

[65]  William F. Cofer.  Documentation of Strengths and Weaknesses of Current Computer Analysis Methods for Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Members , 1999 .

[66]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  PEER Testbed Study on a Laboratory Building: Exercising Seismic Performance Assessment , 2005 .

[67]  G. C. Follente.  Developments in performance-based building codes and standards , 2000 .

[68]  Keith A. Porter,et al.  A Taxonomy of Building Components for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering , 2005 .

[69]  Pedro Arduino,et al.  Estimation of Uncertainty in Geotechnical Properties for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering , 2002 .

[70]  Scott A. Ashford,et al.  Characterization of Large Velocity Pulses for Laboratory Testing , 2002 .

[71]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Building Vulnerability Studies: Modeling and Evaluation of Tilt-up and Steel Reinforced Concrete Buildings , 2003 .

[72]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Rocking response of equipment anchored to a base foundation , 2002 .