A modified Galam’s model for word-of-mouth information exchange

In this paper we analyze the stochastic model proposed by Galam in [S. Galam, Modelling rumors: The no plane Pentagon French hoax case, Physica A 320 (2003), 571–580], for information spreading in a ‘word-of-mouth’ process among agents, based on a majority rule. Using the communications rules among agents defined in the above reference, we first perform simulations of the ‘word-of-mouth’ process and compare the results with the theoretical values predicted by Galam’s model. Some dissimilarities arise in particular when a small number of agents is considered. We find motivations for these dissimilarities and suggest some enhancements by introducing a new parameter dependent model. We propose a modified Galam’s scheme which is asymptotically coincident with the original model in the above reference. Furthermore, for relatively small values of the parameter, we provide a numerical experience proving that the modified model often outperforms the original one.

[1]  Michael A. Kamins,et al.  Consumer Responses to Rumors: Good News, Bad News , 1997 .

[2]  S. Galam,et al.  The role of inflexible minorities in the breaking of democratic opinion dynamics , 2007, physics/0703021.

[3]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Electronic brainstorming: Theory, research, and future directions. , 2003 .

[4]  T. Lux The socio-economic dynamics of speculative markets: interacting agents, chaos, and the fat tails of return distributions , 1998 .

[5]  L. Peliti,et al.  Opinion dynamics in a three-choice system , 2005, cond-mat/0504254.

[6]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes: FORTRAN , 1988 .

[7]  N. Meade,et al.  Modelling and forecasting the diffusion of innovation – A 25-year review , 2006 .

[8]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[9]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Directions for Research: , 1990 .

[10]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  From Density to Destiny: Using Spatial Dimension of Sales Data for Early Prediction of New Product Success , 2004 .

[11]  S. Galam,et al.  Killer geometries in competing species dynamics , 2002, cond-mat/0204173.

[12]  Serge Galam,et al.  SOCIOPHYSICS: A REVIEW OF GALAM MODELS , 2008, 0803.1800.

[13]  Serge Galam,et al.  Fashion, novelty and optimality: an application from Physics , 2005 .

[14]  S. Galam Contrarian deterministic effects on opinion dynamics: “the hung elections scenario” , 2003, cond-mat/0307404.

[15]  D. Levy,et al.  Contagion: a theoretical and empirical review and reconceptualization. , 1993, Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs.

[16]  P. Sweeney,et al.  An evaluation of the impact of social presence through Group size and the use of collaborative software on Group member "Voice" in face-to-face and computer-mediated task Groups , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[17]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  Talk of the Network: A Complex Systems Look at the Underlying Process of Word-of-Mouth , 2001 .

[18]  Serge Galam,et al.  Modelling rumors: the no plane Pentagon French hoax case , 2002, cond-mat/0211571.

[19]  S. Galam Global physics: from percolation to terrorism, guerilla warfare and clandestine activities , 2003, cond-mat/0404265.

[20]  William H. Press,et al.  In: Numerical Recipes in Fortran 90 , 1996 .

[21]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..