Rapid learning of visual ensembles.

We recently demonstrated that observers are capable of encoding not only summary statistics, such as mean and variance of stimulus ensembles, but also the shape of the ensembles. Here, for the first time, we show the learning dynamics of this process, investigate the possible priors for the distribution shape, and demonstrate that observers are able to learn more complex distributions, such as bimodal ones. We used speeding and slowing of response times between trials (intertrial priming) in visual search for an oddly oriented line to assess internal models of distractor distributions. Experiment 1 demonstrates that two repetitions are sufficient for enabling learning of the shape of uniform distractor distributions. In Experiment 2, we compared Gaussian and uniform distractor distributions, finding that following only two repetitions Gaussian distributions are represented differently than uniform ones. Experiment 3 further showed that when distractor distributions are bimodal (with a 30° distance between two uniform intervals), observers initially treat them as uniform, and only with further repetitions do they begin to treat the distributions as bimodal. In sum, observers do not have strong initial priors for distribution shapes and quickly learn simple ones but have the ability to adjust their representations to more complex feature distributions as information accumulates with further repetitions of the same distractor distribution.

[1]  A. Treisman,et al.  Representation of statistical properties , 2003, Vision Research.

[2]  Igor S Utochkin,et al.  Similarity and heterogeneity effects in visual search are mediated by "segmentability". , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  V. Muggeo Estimating regression models with unknown break‐points , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  D. Tadin,et al.  Illusory Movement of Stationary Stimuli in the Visual Periphery: Evidence for a Strong Centrifugal Prior in Motion Processing , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  A. Chetverikov,et al.  Building ensemble representations: How the shape of preceding distractor distributions affects visual search , 2016, Cognition.

[6]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[7]  G. Campana,et al.  Where perception meets memory: A review of repetition priming in visual search tasks , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[8]  I. Utochkin,et al.  Parallel averaging of size is possible but range-limited: a reply to Marchant, Simons, and De Fockert. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[9]  R. Watt,et al.  The computation of orientation statistics from visual texture , 1997, Vision Research.

[10]  L. Beach,et al.  Man as an Intuitive Statistician , 2022 .

[11]  Á. Kristjánsson,et al.  Object- and feature-based priming in visual search , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  D. Ariely Seeing Sets: Representation by Statistical Properties , 2001, Psychological science.

[13]  R. Rosenholtz Visual search for orientation among heterogeneous distractors: experimental results and implications for signal-detection theory models of search. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Dominique Lamy,et al.  Priming of Pop-out provides reliable measures of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention , 2008, Vision Research.

[15]  Christian N. L. Olivers,et al.  Intertrial priming stemming from ambiguity: A new account of priming in visual search , 2006 .

[16]  David Melcher,et al.  Stable statistical representations facilitate visual search. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Arni Kristjansson,et al.  Efficient visual search without top-down or bottom-up guidance , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  AÂ rni KristjaÂnsson Rapid learning in attention shifts : A review , 2005 .

[19]  C. Summerfield,et al.  Priming by the variability of visual information , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  David Whitney,et al.  Ensemble perception: Summarizing the scene and broadening the limits of visual processing. , 2012 .

[21]  I. Utochkin,et al.  Ensemble summary statistics as a basis for rapid visual categorization. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[22]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Cardinal rules: Visual orientation perception reflects knowledge of environmental statistics , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  J. Wolfe,et al.  From Perception to Consciousness: Searching with Anne Treisman , 2012 .

[24]  Á. Kristjánsson,et al.  Is goal-directed attentional guidance just intertrial priming? A review. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[25]  M. Muggeo,et al.  segmented: An R package to Fit Regression Models with Broken-Line Relationships , 2008 .

[26]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[27]  P. Pollard Intuitive judgments of proportions, means, and variances: A review , 1984 .

[28]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[29]  B. Bauer A selective summary of visual averaging research and issues up to 2000. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[30]  Árni Kristjánsson,et al.  Priming in visual search: Separating the effects of target repetition, distractor repetition and role-reversal , 2008, Vision Research.

[31]  G. Alvarez Representing multiple objects as an ensemble enhances visual cognition , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Individual differences in ensemble perception reveal multiple, independent levels of ensemble representation. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  A. Oliva,et al.  The Representation of Simple Ensemble Visual Features Outside the Focus of Attention , 2008, Psychological science.

[34]  P. Atchley,et al.  Discrimination of speed distributions: Sensitivity to statistical properties , 1995, Vision Research.

[35]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Expectations developed over multiple timescales facilitate visual search performance. , 2015, Journal of vision.