Using neural network to predict performance of design-build projects in Singapore

Abstract Design-build (DB) project success may be operationalised into 11 performance metrics. 65 factors that may affect DB project success are identified. Using data from 33 DB projects, correlation analysis shows that there are several factors that affect each performance metric significantly. Artificial neural network (ANN) technique is used to construct the models to predict project performance, and these models are tested using data from five new projects. This study finds that six performance metrics can be predicted with a reasonable degree of accuracy: project intensity; construction and delivery speeds; turnover, system and equipment quality. The key variables that affect project performance may be attributed to both contractors and clients. To ensure project success, contractors should have adequate staffing level, a good track record for completion on budget, and ability in financial management and quality control. Consultants should have a high level of construction sophistication, and have handled DB projects in the past. Clients also play an important part in ensuring DB project success. They would need to have construction experience and handled DB projects in the past. In addition, they should decide on the optimal level of design completion when the budget is fixed and tenders are invited. It is recommended that owners and contractors take note of the factors identified in this study, which significantly affect DB project performance.

[1]  Farzad Khosrowshahi,et al.  Neural network model for contractors’ prequalification for local authority projects , 1999 .

[2]  Ron S. Kenett,et al.  Statistics for Business and Economics , 1973 .

[3]  Low Sui Pheng,et al.  The application of JIT philosophy to construction: a case study in site layout , 1999 .

[4]  Y. C. Kog,et al.  Critical Success Factors for Different Project Objectives , 1999 .

[5]  David K. H. Chua,et al.  Model for Construction Budget Performance—Neural Network Approach , 1997 .

[6]  Gary David Holt,et al.  A theoretical model for optimum project (time) performance based on European best practice , 2000 .

[7]  Gary David Holt,et al.  Tendering procedures, contractual arrangements and Latham: the contractors' view , 1996 .

[8]  Mark Konchar,et al.  Comparison of U.S. Project Delivery Systems , 1998 .

[9]  David K. H. Chua,et al.  Key determinants for construction schedule performance , 1999 .

[10]  Keith R. Molenaar,et al.  MODEL FOR PUBLIC SECTOR DESIGN-BUILD PROJECT SELECTION , 1998 .

[11]  Danny C. K. Ho,et al.  Design and Build Project Success Factors: Multivariate Analysis , 2001 .

[12]  Seymour S. Greenfield Turnkey Construction in the United States , 1982 .

[13]  Trefor P. Williams Predicting completed project cost using bidding data , 2002 .

[14]  Alice N. Outerbridge,et al.  Impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of job performance , 1986 .

[15]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  A comparative study of causes of time overruns in Hong Kong construction projects , 1997 .

[16]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Evaluation of factors affecting Time and Cost performance in Hong Kong Building projects , 1999 .

[17]  David Baccarini,et al.  The Logical Framework Method for Defining Project Success , 1999 .

[18]  Edward J. Jaselskis,et al.  Optimal Allocation of Project Management Resources for Achieving Success , 1991 .

[19]  Zedan Hatush,et al.  Evaluating contractor prequalification data: selection criteria and project success factors , 1997 .

[20]  J. K. Yates Use of Design/Build in E/C Industry , 1995 .