Identification of marine management priority areas using a GIS-based multi-criteria approach

Abstract There is a global issue of balancing resource exploitation with environmental protection. In particular, the marine environment is subject to many anthropogenic pressures which are most severe in coastal zones. Authorities managing these pressures have limited time and resources, so it is essential that they have access to data and modelling tools which help them prioritise their efforts. This study presents a spatial modelling approach which draws together a range of key criteria into a single framework to identify marine areas which should be prioritised for management and monitoring. The study area, Sussex coastal waters (southern UK), was assessed through quantification and modelling of relative environmental score and fishing pressure score. Environmental score was assessed by combining ecosystem services provision, habitat diversity and sensitivity, based on seabed habitat data. Fishing pressure was assessed by combining fishing benefits, impacts and effort for specific local fisheries. The marine priority assessment was compared to the location of Marine Protected Areas to understand the relationship with existing management measures. High and very high priority classes covered just 5% of the study area, with the highest priority area between Selsey and Bognor Regis. These habitats were ones found to have high environmental score (rocky reefs and seaweed-dominated sediment) concurrent with high fishing pressure. This modelling approach suggests that these areas should be the focus of further research, monitoring and potentially management measures. There was no significant difference between the priority score inside the MPAs and those outside, however, the environmental score was significantly higher inside MPAs. These findings suggest current MPAs are protecting valuable and/or sensitive habitats and management within these sites may have resulted in less fishing pressure. Each multi-criteria element of the study individually advances our understanding of the value of this marine environment and the importance of fisheries in Sussex coastal waters. Together, the multi-criteria approach strengthens the knowledge of processes and interactions, building a robust evidence base for management decision making. A framework has been developed which, with the use of different or additional datasets, could be applied to many scenarios supporting environmental managers worldwide.

[1]  Jeremy S. Collie,et al.  Modification of marine habitats by trawling activities: prognosis and solutions , 2002 .

[2]  Daniela Russi,et al.  Socio-Economic Benefits of the EU Marine Protected Areas , 2016 .

[3]  Claire L. Szostek,et al.  Global analysis of depletion and recovery of seabed biota after bottom trawling disturbance , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[5]  Marnie L Campbell,et al.  Classification of Non-Indigenous Species Based on Their Impacts: Considerations for Application in Marine Management , 2015, PLoS biology.

[6]  N. Polunin,et al.  Mapping inshore fisheries: Comparing observed and perceived distributions of pot fishing activity in Northumberland , 2015 .

[7]  P. Abreu,et al.  Human activities and climate variability drive fast‐paced change across the world's estuarine–coastal ecosystems , 2016, Global change biology.

[8]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  A multidisciplinary approach in the design of marine protected areas: Integration of science and stakeholder based methods , 2015 .

[9]  S. Kark,et al.  3D spatial conservation prioritisation: Accounting for depth in marine environments , 2017 .

[10]  Craig S. Rose,et al.  Prioritization of knowledge‐needs to achieve best practices for bottom trawling in relation to seabed habitats , 2016 .

[11]  H. Possingham,et al.  Efficiently enforcing artisanal fisheries to protect estuarine biodiversity. , 2018, Ecological Applications.

[12]  Kieran Hyder,et al.  Can citizen science contribute to the evidence-base that underpins marine policy? , 2015 .

[13]  P. Levin,et al.  Habitat triage for exploited fishes: Can we identify essential “Essential Fish Habitat?” , 2005 .

[14]  Michel J. Kaiser,et al.  The effects of fishing on marine ecosystems , 1998 .

[15]  Snejana Moncheva,et al.  An environmental assessment of risk in achieving good environmental status to support regional prioritisation of management in Europe , 2012 .

[16]  Keith H. Coble,et al.  Economic Assessment of FMDv Releases from the National Bio and Agro Defense Facility , 2015, PloS one.

[17]  G. Daily,et al.  Natural Capital: Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services , 2011 .

[18]  J. Polovina CLIMATE VARIATION, REGIME SHIFTS, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES , 2005 .

[19]  H. Tyler-Walters,et al.  Assessing the sensitivity of subtidal sedimentary habitats to pressures associated with marine activities. Phase 1 Report: Rationale and proposed ecological groupings for Level 5 biotopes against which sensitivity assessments would be best undertaken. , 2014 .

[20]  Jihua Zhang,et al.  Measurement of the ocean wealth of nations in China: An inclusive wealth approach , 2018 .

[21]  Arthur O Tuda,et al.  Resolving coastal conflicts using marine spatial planning. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[22]  John S. Gray,et al.  Marine biodiversity: patterns, threats and conservation needs , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[23]  Desiré Paelinckx,et al.  A concept for biological valuation in the marine environment , 2007 .

[24]  K. Sundbäck,et al.  E C O L O G Y , 2022 .

[25]  P. Mace,et al.  New Zealand's ecosystem approach to fisheries management , 2016 .

[26]  Michael J de Smith,et al.  Geospatial Analysis: A Comprehensive Guide to Principles, Techniques and Software Tools , 2007 .

[27]  S. Lewin,et al.  Mapping fishing effort: Combining fishermen’s knowledge with satellite monitoring data in English waters , 2017 .

[28]  S. Hearn,et al.  Assessing the sensitivity of habitats to fishing: from seabed maps to sensitivity maps. , 2013, Journal of fish biology.

[29]  F. Alves,et al.  Identifying conservation priority areas to inform maritime spatial planning: A new approach. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[30]  F. Douvere The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management , 2008 .

[31]  Alistair J. Hobday,et al.  Systematic Conservation Planning: A Better Recipe for Managing the High Seas for Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use , 2014 .

[32]  Yuei-An Liou,et al.  Zoning eco-environmental vulnerability for environmental management and protection , 2016 .

[33]  Jochen A. G. Jaeger Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[34]  P. Farrell,et al.  Trophic level transfer of microplastic: Mytilus edulis (L.) to Carcinus maenas (L.). , 2013, Environmental pollution.

[35]  Karen L. McLeod,et al.  Ecosystem-based management for the oceans , 2009 .

[36]  Jacques Baudry,et al.  A review on the use of entropy in landscape ecology: heterogeneity, unpredictability, scale dependence and their links with thermodynamics , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[37]  Kilian M. Stehfest,et al.  Mapping fisheries for marine spatial planning: gear-specific vessel monitoring system (VMS), marine conservation and offshore renewable energy , 2014 .

[38]  Michel J. Kaiser,et al.  Assessing and predicting the relative ecological impacts of disturbance on habitats with different sensitivities , 2007 .

[39]  R. Steneck,et al.  Coral Reefs Under Rapid Climate Change and Ocean Acidification , 2007, Science.

[40]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Christina C. Hicks,et al.  Managing Small-Scale Commercial Fisheries for Adaptive Capacity: Insights from Dynamic Social-Ecological Drivers of Change in Monterey Bay , 2015, PloS one.

[42]  B. Anderson,et al.  The rising tide: assessing the risks of climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal zones , 2007 .

[43]  R. Moss,et al.  Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment , 2003 .

[44]  Christopher J. Smith,et al.  The footprint of bottom trawling in European waters: distribution, intensity, and seabed integrity , 2016, ICES Journal of Marine Science.

[45]  W. Wiseman,et al.  Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. , 2001, Journal of environmental quality.

[46]  M. Quaas,et al.  Beyond fisheries: Common-pool resource problems in oceanic resources and services , 2016 .

[47]  Richard Grenyer,et al.  What is the extent and distribution of evidence on effectiveness of systematic conservation planning around the globe? A systematic map protocol , 2016, Environmental Evidence.

[48]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  An Evaluation of Marine Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas in the Context of Spatial Conservation Prioritization , 2018 .

[49]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Estimating the sustainability of towed fishing‐gear impacts on seabed habitats: a simple quantitative risk assessment method applicable to data‐limited fisheries , 2017 .

[50]  H. Possingham,et al.  Addressing transboundary conservation challenges through marine spatial prioritization , 2018, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[51]  K. Bjorndal,et al.  Historical Overfishing and the Recent Collapse of Coastal Ecosystems , 2001, Science.

[52]  R. Costanza,et al.  Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  Greg Brown,et al.  Identifying conflict potential in a coastal and marine environment using participatory mapping. , 2017, Journal of environmental management.

[54]  Quinn Weninger,et al.  Bioeconomies of scope and the discard problem in multiple-species fisheries , 2009 .

[55]  O. Hoegh‐Guldberg,et al.  Ecological responses to recent climate change , 2002, Nature.

[56]  N. Carvalho,et al.  The 2016 annual economic report on the EU fishing fleet (STECF 16-11) , 2016 .

[57]  F. Natale,et al.  Identifying fisheries dependent communities in EU coastal areas , 2013 .

[58]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[59]  K. McGarigal,et al.  LANDSCAPE-LEVEL PATTERNS OF AVIAN DIVERSITY IN THE OREGON COAST RANGE , 2003 .

[60]  Á. Borja,et al.  Assessment of goods and services, vulnerability, and conservation status of European seabed biotopes: a stepping stone towards ecosystem-based marine spatial management , 2012 .

[61]  N. Hintzen,et al.  Estimating sensitivity of seabed habitats to disturbance by bottom trawling based on the longevity of benthic fauna , 2018, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[62]  Á. Borja,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services provided by benthic habitats in the European North Atlantic Ocean , 2014, Front. Mar. Sci..

[63]  Wanfei Qiu,et al.  The emerging policy landscape for marine spatial planning in Europe , 2013 .

[64]  Claire Brown,et al.  Marine and coastal ecosystems and human well-being: A synthesis report based on the findings of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , 2006 .

[65]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  A habitat‐based approach to predict impacts of marine protected areas on fishers , 2018, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[66]  Steve Kelling,et al.  Abundance models improve spatial and temporal prioritization of conservation resources. , 2015, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[67]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[68]  Areti Kontogianni,et al.  Valuation of natural marine ecosystems: an economic perspective , 2009 .

[69]  H. Gerritsen,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity in Fishing Creates de facto Refugia for Endangered Celtic Sea Elasmobranchs , 2012, PloS one.

[70]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. , 1999, Science.

[71]  Friederike Ziegler,et al.  Spatial distribution of fishing effort in relation to seafloor habitats in the Kattegat, a GIS analysis , 2007 .

[72]  D. Barceló,et al.  Does the presence of caffeine in the marine environment represent an environmental risk? A regional and global study. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[73]  H P Possingham,et al.  Critical research needs for managing coral reef marine protected areas: perspectives of academics and managers. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[74]  B. Halpern,et al.  Mechanisms and risk of cumulative impacts to coastal ecosystem services: An expert elicitation approach. , 2017, Journal of environmental management.

[75]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Prioritizing global conservation efforts , 2006, Nature.