The Impact of Market Orientation, Product Advantage, and Launch Proficiency on New Product Performance and Organizational Performance

Some scholars have suggested recently that a market-oriented culture leads to superior performance, at least in part, because of the new products that are developed and are brought to market. Others have reinforced this wisdom by revealing that a market-oriented culture enhances organizational innovativeness and new product success, both of which in turn improve organizational performance. These scholars do not reveal, however, through which new product development (NPD) activities a market-oriented culture is converted into superior performance. To determine how critical NPD activities are for a market-oriented firm to achieve superior performance, our study uses data from 126 firms in The Netherlands to investigate the structural relationships among market orientation, new product advantage, the proficiency in new product launch activities, new product performance, and organizational performance. We focus on product advantage—because product benefits typically form the compelling reasons for customers to buy the new product—and on the launch proficiency—as the launch stage represents the most costly and risky part of the NPD process. Focusing on the launch stage also is relevant because it is only during the launch that it will become evident whether a market orientation has crystallized into a superior product in the eyes of the customer. The results provide evidence that a market orientation is related positively to product advantage and to the proficiency in market testing, launch budgeting, launch strategy, and launch tactics. Product advantage and the proficiency in launch tactics are related positively to new product performance, which itself is related positively to organizational performance. Market orientation has no direct relationship to new product performance and to organizational performance. An important implication of our study is that the impact of a market orientation on organizational performance is channeled through the effects of a market orientation on product advantage and launch proficiency; subsequently through the effects of product advantage and the proficiency in launch tactics on new product performance; and finally through the effect of new product performance on organizational performance. These channeling effects are much more subtle and complex than the direct relationship of market orientation on organizational performance previously assumed. Another implication of our study is that the impact of a market orientation on performance occurs through the launch activities rather than being pervasive to all organizational processes and activities. A reason for this finding may be that NPD is the one element of the marketing mix that predominantly is the responsibility of the firm, whereas promotion and distribution often are in control of organizations outside the firm (e.g., advertising agencies, major retailers) and whereas the channel or the market often dictates the price. Both implications provide ample opportunities for further research on market orientation and NPD.

[1]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[2]  Fred Langerak,et al.  Effects of market orientation on the behaviors of salespersons and purchasers, channel relationships, and performance of manufacturers , 2001 .

[3]  David M. Szymanski,et al.  Why Some New Products are More Successful than Others , 2001 .

[4]  Christian Homburg,et al.  A Multiple-Layer Model of Market-Oriented Organizational Culture: Measurement Issues and Performance Outcomes , 2000 .

[5]  Glenn B. Voss,et al.  Strategic Orientation and Firm Performance in an Artistic Environment , 2000 .

[6]  John C. Narver,et al.  Market‐oriented is more than being customer‐led , 1999 .

[7]  James M. Sinkula,et al.  Learning Orientation, Market Orientation, and Innovation: Integrating and Extending Models of Organizational Performance , 1999 .

[8]  James M. Sinkula,et al.  The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance , 1999 .

[9]  Alfred M. Pelham Influence of Environment, Strategy, and Market Orientation on Performance in Small Manufacturing Firms , 1999 .

[10]  Jin K. Han,et al.  Market Orientation and Organizational Performance: Is Innovation a Missing Link? , 1998 .

[11]  John C. Narver,et al.  Strategic Management Journal Research Notes and Communications Customer-led and Market-oriented: Let's Not Confuse the Two , 2022 .

[12]  Rohit Deshpandé,et al.  Measuring Market Orientation: Generalization and Synthesis , 1998 .

[13]  Stanley F. Slater,et al.  Additional Thoughts on the Measurement of Market Orientation: A Comment on Deshpande and Farley , 1998 .

[14]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  In search of generic launch strategies for new products , 1998 .

[15]  C. Terwiesch,et al.  When product development performance makes a difference: A statistical analysis in the electronics industry , 1998 .

[16]  A. Griffin PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices , 1997 .

[17]  M. Parry,et al.  The Determinants of Japanese New Product Successes , 1997 .

[18]  H. Gatignon,et al.  Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance , 1997 .

[19]  David T. Wilson,et al.  A longitudinal study of the impact of market structure, firm structure, strategy, and market orientation culture on dimensions of small-firm performance , 1996 .

[20]  A. Griffin,et al.  PDMA Success Measurement Project: Recommended Measures for Product Development Success and Failure , 1996 .

[21]  Claudia Bird Schoonhoven,et al.  Community, Population, and Organization Effects on Innovation: A Multilevel Perspective , 1996 .

[22]  Mark E. Parry,et al.  What separates Japanese new product winners from losers , 1996 .

[23]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[24]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Market Orientation and Innovation , 1996 .

[25]  Adrian B. Ryans,et al.  Entry Strategy and Long-Term Performance: Conceptualization and Empirical Examination , 1995 .

[26]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  An exploratory analysis of the impact of market orientation on new product performance a contingency approach , 1995 .

[27]  Kwaku Atuahene-Gima,et al.  An Exploratory Analysis of the Impact of Market Orientation on New Product Performance , 1995 .

[28]  C. Moorman Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes , 1995 .

[29]  S. Hunt,et al.  The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition , 1995 .

[30]  R. Calantone,et al.  Determinants of New Product Performance: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 1994 .

[31]  Mark E. Parry,et al.  The dimensions of industrial new product success and failure in state enterprises in the People's Republic of China , 1994 .

[32]  John C. Narver,et al.  Market orientation, customer value, and superior performance , 1994 .

[33]  John C. Narver,et al.  Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship? , 1994 .

[34]  R. Cooper Third‐Generation New Product Processes , 1994 .

[35]  A. Griffin,et al.  An Interim Report on Measuring Product Development Success and Failure , 1993 .

[36]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences , 1993 .

[37]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language , 1993 .

[38]  J. L. Naman,et al.  Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model and empirical tests , 1993 .

[39]  J. Farley,et al.  Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis , 1993 .

[40]  Robert W. Ruekert Developing a market orientation: An organizational strategy perspective , 1992 .

[41]  A. Griffin,et al.  Patterns of Communication Among Marketing, Engineering and Manufacturing-A Comparison Between Two New Product Teams , 1992 .

[42]  Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp,et al.  The use of LISREL in validating marketing constructs. , 1991 .

[43]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research , 1991 .

[44]  L. Dwyer,et al.  Organizational Environment, New Product Process Activities, and Project Outcomes , 1991 .

[45]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. , 1990 .

[46]  John C. Narver,et al.  The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability , 1990 .

[47]  Roger Calantone,et al.  An Integrative Model of the New Product Development Process: An Empirical Validation , 1988 .

[48]  M. Lambkin Order of entry and performance in new markets , 1988 .

[49]  John R. Ronchetto,et al.  Tracing Emergent Processes in Marketing Strategy Formation , 1988 .

[50]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[51]  R. Cooper,et al.  New Products: What Separates Winners from Losers? , 1987 .

[52]  Gary L. Lilien,et al.  New industrial product performance: The effects of market characteristics and strategy☆ , 1985 .

[53]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  A Propositional Inventory for New Diffusion Research , 1985 .

[54]  Robert W. Ruekert,et al.  The Organization of Marketing Activities: A Contingency Theory of Structure and Performance , 1985 .

[55]  Eunsang Yoon,et al.  New Industrial Product Performance : The Effects of Market Characteristics and Strategy * , 1985 .

[56]  B. Zirger,et al.  A study of success and failure in product innovation: The case of the U.S. electronics industry , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[57]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit , 1984 .

[58]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  The misuse of marketing: An American tragedy , 1981 .

[59]  James J. Chrisman,et al.  Corporate diversification: Entry, strategy, and performance , 1984 .

[60]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  The Dimensions of Industrial New Product Success and Failure , 1979 .

[61]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[62]  Edward M. Tauber,et al.  How market research discourages major innovation , 1974 .

[63]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .