A multi-resolution framework for automated in-plane alignment and error quantification in additive manufacturing

Additive manufacturing (AM) has shown its capability in producing complex geometries. Due to the additive nature, the in situ layer-wise inspection of geometric accuracy is essential to making AM reach its full potential. This paper aims to propose a novel automated in-plane alignment and error quantification framework to distinguish the fabrication, measurement and alignment errors in AM.,In this work, a multi-resolution framework based on wavelet decomposition is proposed to automatically align two-dimensional point clouds via a polar coordinate representation and then to differentiate errors from different sources based on a randomized complete block design approach. In addition, a two-stage optimization model is proposed to find the best configuration of the multi-resolution framework.,The proposed framework can not only distinguish errors attributed to different sources but also evaluate the performance and consistency of alignment results under different levels of details.,A sample part with different featured layers, including a simple free-form layer, a defective layer and a layer with internal features, is used to illustrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed framework. The proposed alignment method outperforms the widely used iterative closest point algorithm.,This work fills a research gap of state-of-the-art studies by automatically quantifying different types of error inherent in manufacturing, measuring and part alignment.

[1]  M. Javaid,et al.  Additive manufacturing applications in medical cases: A literature based review , 2018, Alexandria Journal of Medicine.

[2]  Pablo Irarrazaval,et al.  Quantitative assessments of geometric errors for rapid prototyping in medical applications , 2012 .

[3]  He Luan,et al.  Prescriptive Modeling and Compensation of In-Plane Shape Deformation for 3-D Printed Freeform Products , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[4]  Qiang Huang,et al.  In-Plane Shape-Deviation Modeling and Compensation for Fused Deposition Modeling Processes , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[5]  Zhenyu Kong,et al.  Assessment of Dimensional Integrity and Spatial Defect Localization in Additive Manufacturing Using Spectral Graph Theory , 2016 .

[6]  Niloy J. Mitra,et al.  Symmetry in 3D Geometry: Extraction and Applications , 2013, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[7]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  A review of 3D/2D registration methods for image-guided interventions , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[8]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  Sanjay B. Joshi,et al.  Error compensation for fused deposition modeling (FDM) machine by correcting slice files , 2008 .

[10]  Gary K. L. Tam,et al.  Registration of 3D Point Clouds and Meshes: A Survey from Rigid to Nonrigid , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[11]  Qiang Huang,et al.  Predictive model building across different process conditions and shapes in 3D printing , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE).

[12]  Sanjay B. Joshi,et al.  Parametric error modeling and software error compensation for rapid prototyping , 2003 .

[13]  Enrico Savio,et al.  Metrology of freeform shaped parts , 2007 .

[14]  Frank W. Liou,et al.  Aerospace applications of laser additive manufacturing , 2017 .

[15]  Ron Kimmel,et al.  Patch‐Collaborative Spectral Point‐Cloud Denoising , 2013, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[16]  Qiang Huang,et al.  Statistical Predictive Modeling and Compensation of Geometric Deviations of Three-Dimensional Printed Products , 2014 .

[17]  Ratnadeep Paul,et al.  Error Minimization in Layered Manufacturing Parts by Stereolithography File Modification Using a Vertex Translation Algorithm , 2013 .

[18]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Nabil Anwer,et al.  Deviation Modeling and Shape Transformation in Design for Additive Manufacturing , 2017 .

[20]  Sam Anand,et al.  Geometric Approaches to Input File Modification for Part Quality Improvement in Additive Manufacturing , 2015 .

[21]  Fugee Tsung,et al.  A prediction and compensation scheme for in-plane shape deviation of additive manufacturing with information on process parameters , 2018 .

[22]  Tirthankar Dasgupta,et al.  Optimal offline compensation of shape shrinkage for three-dimensional printing processes , 2015 .

[23]  Pablo Irarrazaval,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of geometric errors in additive manufacturing medical models. , 2015, Medical engineering & physics.

[24]  Albert J. Shih,et al.  Additive Manufacturing of Custom Orthoses and Prostheses – A Review☆ , 2015 .

[25]  Josiah Manson,et al.  Streaming Surface Reconstruction Using Wavelets , 2008, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[26]  Miroslav Pajic,et al.  Recognition of Planar Segments in Point Cloud Based on Wavelet Transform , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.