Intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility and accuracy of the LuSens assay: A reporter gene-cell line to detect keratinocyte activation by skin sensitizers.

Several non-animal methods are now available to address the key events leading to skin sensitization as defined by the adverse outcome pathway. The KeratinoSens assay addresses the cellular event of keratinocyte activation and is a method accepted under OECD TG 442D. In this study, the results of an inter-laboratory evaluation of the "me-too" LuSens assay, a bioassay that uses a human keratinocyte cell line harboring a reporter gene construct composed of the rat antioxidant response element (ARE) of the NADPH:quinone oxidoreductase 1 gene and the luciferase gene, are described. Earlier in-house validation with 74 substances showed an accuracy of 82% in comparison to human data. When used in a battery of non-animal methods, even higher predictivity is achieved. To meet European validation criteria, a multicenter study was conducted in 5 laboratories. The study was divided into two phases, to assess 1) transferability of the method, and 2) reproducibility and accuracy. Phase I was performed by testing 8 non-coded test substances; the results showed a good transferability to naïve laboratories even without on-site training. Phase II was performed with 20 coded test substances (performance standards recommended by OECD, 2015). In this phase, the intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility as well as accuracy of the method was evaluated. The data demonstrate a remarkable reproducibility of 100% and an accuracy of over 80% in identifying skin sensitizers, indicating a good concordance with in vivo data. These results demonstrate good transferability, reliability and accuracy of the method thereby achieving the standards necessary for use in a regulatory setting to detect skin sensitizers.

[1]  H. Maibach,et al.  Prevalence of patch test results from 1970 to 2002 in a multi‐centre population in North America (NACDG) , 2007, Contact dermatitis.

[2]  W. Weston,et al.  Does Sensitization to Contact Allergens Begin in Infancy? , 2000, Pediatrics.

[3]  Andreas Natsch,et al.  Skin Sensitizers Induce Antioxidant Response Element Dependent Genes: Application to the In Vitro Testing of the Sensitization Potential of Chemicals , 2008 .

[4]  A. Kansky,et al.  Increase in contact allergy to fragrances: patch‐test results 1989–1998 , 2000, Contact dermatitis.

[5]  Gerberick Frank,et al.  The intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility and predictivity of the KeratinoSens assay to predict skin sensitizers in vitro: results of a ring-study in five laboratories. , 2011, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[6]  Allan Linneberg,et al.  The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population – prevalence and main findings , 2007, Contact dermatitis.

[7]  D. Basketter,et al.  Skin Irritation and Sensitization: Mechanisms and New Approaches for Risk Assessment , 2008, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology.

[8]  I Kimber,et al.  Classification of contact allergens according to potency: proposals. , 2003, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[9]  Takao Ashikaga,et al.  Prediction of skin sensitization potency of chemicals by human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) and an attempt at classifying skin sensitization potency. , 2012, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[10]  João Barroso,et al.  Categorization of Chemicals According to Their Relative Human Skin Sensitizing Potency , 2014, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[11]  T. Mosmann Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. , 1983, Journal of immunological methods.

[12]  I Kimber,et al.  Threshold for classification as a skin sensitizer in the local lymph node assay: a statistical evaluation. , 1999, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[13]  Petra S Kern,et al.  Mechanistic applicability domain classification of a local lymph node assay dataset for skin sensitization. , 2007, Chemical research in toxicology.

[14]  Andreas Natsch,et al.  Reporter cell lines for skin sensitization testing , 2015, Archives of Toxicology.

[15]  I Kimber,et al.  Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data. , 2001, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[16]  Grace Patlewicz,et al.  A comparison of reactivity schemes for the prediction skin sensitization potential. , 2008, Chemical research in toxicology.

[17]  Petra S Kern,et al.  Assessing skin sensitization hazard in mice and men using non-animal test methods. , 2015, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[18]  David W Roberts,et al.  Mechanistic applicability domains for nonanimal-based prediction of toxicological end points: general principles and application to reactive toxicity. , 2006, Chemical research in toxicology.

[19]  David W Roberts,et al.  Chemical mechanisms for skin sensitization by aromatic compounds with hydroxy and amino groups. , 2009, Chemical research in toxicology.

[20]  Ton van Huygevoort,et al.  The Murine Local Lymph Node Assay , 2017 .

[21]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Compilation of Historical Local Lymph Node Data for Evaluation of Skin Sensitization Alternative Methods , 2005, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[22]  Robert Landsiedel,et al.  LuSens: a keratinocyte based ARE reporter gene assay for use in integrated testing strategies for skin sensitization hazard identification. , 2014, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[23]  Andreas Natsch,et al.  Performance of a novel keratinocyte-based reporter cell line to screen skin sensitizers in vitro. , 2010, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.