Routine versus selective abdominal computed tomography scan in the evaluation of right lower quadrant pain: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES To determine the role of abdominal computed tomography (CT) imaging in patients with right lower quadrant (RLQ) pain. The authors hypothesized that selective use of abdominal CT would reduce imaging without increasing the rates of negative appendectomy and perforated appendicitis. METHODS A prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted in a community teaching emergency department. Adult patients with acute RLQ abdominal pain with suspected acute appendicitis were included. Patients were randomized to mandatory (all patients) or selective (based on clinical evaluation) abdominal CT imaging. The primary outcome was the negative appendectomy rate. RESULTS A total of 152 patients were randomized to selective (n = 80) and mandatory (n = 72) intervention groups. The mean (+/-SD) age was 34.1 (+/-3.5) years, and 48% were female. CT imaging was performed in 54 of 80 patients (68%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 56% to 78%) in the selective group and in 70 of 72 patients (97%; 95% CI = 90% to 100%) in the mandatory group. There was a trend to a decreased rate of negative appendectomy in the mandatory group (1/39 [2.6%]; 95% CI = 0.5% to 13.2%) as compared with the selective group (6/43 [13.9%]; 95% CI = 6.6% to 27.3%), with a difference in prevalence rates of 11.3% (95% CI = -3.5% to 26.3%). There was also a trend to a decreased perforated appendix rate in the mandatory group (4/39 [10.3%]) as compared with the selective group (7/38 [18.4%]), with a difference in prevalence rates of 8.2% (95% CI = -8.0% to 24.4%). CONCLUSIONS In this small sample of adult patients with RLQ abdominal pain and suspected acute appendicitis, CT imaging was performed less frequently in the selective group and there was a trend with mandatory CT imaging to reduced rates of negative appendectomy and perforated appendices.

[1]  L. Neumayer,et al.  Impact of journal articles and grand rounds on practice: CT scanning in appendicitis , 2002, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[2]  M. Florence,et al.  A prospective trial of computed tomography and ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in the atypical patient. , 2000, American journal of surgery.

[3]  J. Kuhn,et al.  The role of computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. , 1999, American journal of surgery.

[4]  J. G. Schuler,et al.  Is there a role for abdominal computed tomographic scans in appendicitis? , 1998, Archives of surgery.

[5]  R. Novelline,et al.  Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Can appendiceal CT scanning be utilized effectively in widespread general surgical practice? , 2002, The American surgeon.

[7]  Gerald J Berry,et al.  Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates. , 2002, Radiology.

[8]  M. Nipper,et al.  Computed tomography and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis: when are they indicated? , 2001, Archives of surgery.

[9]  D W Rattner,et al.  Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. , 1999, Annals of surgery.

[10]  G. Dunnington,et al.  High negative appendectomy rates are no longer acceptable. , 1997, American journal of surgery.

[11]  J. E. Barone,et al.  Liberal use of computed tomography scanning does not improve diagnostic accuracy in appendicitis. , 2003, American journal of surgery.

[12]  R. Malt,et al.  Appendicitis Near Its Centenary , 1984, Annals of surgery.

[13]  B. Daley,et al.  Influence of Preoperative Computed Tomography on Patients Undergoing Appendectomy , 2001, The American surgeon.

[14]  E. Ghersin,et al.  The Role of Selective Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis and Management of Suspected Acute Appendicitis , 2002, The American surgeon.

[15]  T. Ko,et al.  The use of abdominal computed tomography scan decreases the frequency of misdiagnosis in cases of suspected appendicitis. , 2002, American journal of surgery.

[16]  M. Curet,et al.  Institutional variations in the management of patients with acute appendicitis , 2003, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[17]  C. Peck,et al.  The clinical role of noncontrast helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. , 2000, American journal of surgery.

[18]  B. Doust,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of focused appendiceal CT in clinically equivocal cases of acute appendicitis. , 2001, Radiology.

[19]  H. Körner,et al.  Incidence of Acute Nonperforated and Perforated Appendicitis: Age-specific and Sex-specific Analysis , 1997, World Journal of Surgery.

[20]  J. Clark,et al.  The value of limited computed tomography with rectal contrast in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. , 2000, American journal of surgery.

[21]  D. Guss,et al.  Impact of helical computed tomography on the outcomes of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. , 2003, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[22]  H. Ho,et al.  Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. , 2001, Archives of surgery.

[23]  V. A. Silberman.  Appendectomy in a large metropolitan hospital. Retrospective analysis of 1,013 cases. , 1981, American journal of surgery.

[24]  R. Novelline,et al.  Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination. , 1997, Radiology.

[25]  W. Wahl,et al.  Liberal Use of CT Scanning Helps to Diagnose Appendicitis in Adults , 2003, The American surgeon.

[26]  D. Lu,et al.  Accuracy of nonfocused helical CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a 5-year review. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  Soumitra R. Eachempati,et al.  Interpretation of computed tomography does not correlate with laboratory or pathologic findings in surgically confirmed acute appendicitis. , 2000, Surgery.

[28]  F. Lewis,et al.  Appendicitis. A critical review of diagnosis and treatment in 1,000 cases. , 1975, Archives of surgery.

[29]  S. Chopra,et al.  Appendicitis: selective use of abdominal CT reduces negative appendectomy rate. , 2003, Surgical infections.

[30]  R. Cydulka.  Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis ☆ , 2003 .

[31]  D. Hale,et al.  Appendectomy: a contemporary appraisal. , 1997, Annals of surgery.

[32]  Neil M Rofsky,et al.  Appendicitis: the impact of computed tomography imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates , 1998, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[33]  C. Langlotz,et al.  Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material. , 2001, Radiology.

[34]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Right lower quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis: nonfocused appendiceal CT--review of 100 cases. , 2000, Radiology.

[35]  J. G. Schuler,et al.  Impact of abdominal CT imaging on the management of appendicitis: an update. , 2002, The Journal of surgical research.

[36]  D. Oller,et al.  Is appendiceal CT scan overused for evaluating patients with right lower quadrant pain? , 2001, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[37]  R. Satava,et al.  Balancing the normal appendectomy rate with the perforated appendicitis rate: implications for quality assurance. , 1992, The American surgeon.

[38]  Rakesh Patel,et al.  Advantages of focused helical computed tomographic scanning with rectal contrast only vs triple contrast in the diagnosis of clinically uncertain acute appendicitis: a prospective randomized study. , 2004, Archives of surgery.