Adjusting a polymer formulation for an optimal bioresorbable stent: a 6-month follow-up study.

AIMS To assess the impact of the composition in L- and D- of lactic acid stereo copolymers without drug elution on the in situ behaviour of prototype stents in terms of biomechanics and biocompatibility. METHODS AND RESULTS PLA50, 75, and 92 stereo-copolymer stents (L/D lactic acid ratio from 1 to 11.5) were processed using the injection moulding facilities of Arterial Remodeling Technologies (Noisy le Roi, France). The resulting 3 mm outer diameter tubes having a diameter at the desired nominal size were laser-cut and crimped on regular angioplasty balloons and chemically sterilised prior to implantation in iliac rabbit arteries. Acute recoil was higher in PLA50 and PLA75 stent-treated arteries than in those with PLA92 stents (17.4 ± 11.4 vs. 13.5 ± 7.6 vs. 4.1 ± 3.8 %, respectively, p=0.001). At one month, in-stent area was higher in PLA92 than in PLA50 and PLA75 stented arteries (5.9 ± 0.6 vs. 1.6 ± 1.6 vs. 2.6 ± 3.2 mm², respectively, p<0.001). Re-endothelialisation was complete, and inflammation was mild around the struts, similar among the three stents. Late lumen loss and neointimal area were low and similar in PLA92 stent-treated arteries one and six months after angioplasty (0.2 ± 0.2 vs. 0.3 ± 0.2 mm, p=0.60; 0.5 ± 0.5 vs. 0.5 ± 0.8 mm², p=0.72, respectively). At six months, inflammation decreased compared to one-month follow-up (1.4 ± 0.5 vs. 0.6 ± 0.5, p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS A stereo-copolymer composition strongly influences biomechanical properties of PLA bioresorbable stents in agreement with what has been known for a long time from other applications, but not biocompatibility. PLA92 stents appeared as presenting acceptable acute deployment and 6-month favourable outcome in the rabbit model despite the absence of drugs.

[1]  Eric Durand,et al.  Effect of local heating on restenosis and in-stent neointimal hyperplasia in the atherosclerotic rabbit model: a dose-ranging study. , 2008, European heart journal.

[2]  P. Christel,et al.  Stereoregular bioresorbable polyesters for orthopaedic surgery , 1981 .

[3]  P. Serruys,et al.  Ten-year follow-up of the IGAKI-TAMAI stent. A posthumous tribute to the scientific work of Dr. Hideo Tamai. , 2009, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[4]  M. Vert,et al.  Intravascular bioresorbable polymeric stents: a potential alternative to current drug eluting metal stents. , 2007, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[5]  M. Vert,et al.  A route to high radioactivity 3H-labelled PLA polymers , 1999 .

[6]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Bioresorbable Scaffold: The Advent of a New Era in Percutaneous Coronary and Peripheral Revascularization? , 2011, Circulation.

[7]  M. Vert Degradable and bioresorbable polymers in surgery and in pharmacology: beliefs and facts , 2009, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[8]  W Rutsch,et al.  A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  R. Virmani,et al.  The bioabsorption process: tissue and cellular mechanisms and outcomes. , 2009, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[10]  Suming Li,et al.  PLA stereocopolymers as sources of bioresorbable stents: preliminary investigation in rabbit. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[11]  H. Uehata,et al.  Initial and 6-month results of biodegradable poly-l-lactic acid coronary stents in humans. , 2000, Circulation.

[12]  David Rotger,et al.  Late stent recoil of the bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent and its relationship with plaque morphology. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  R E Vlietstra,et al.  Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  A bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent system (ABSORB): 2-year outcomes and results from multiple imaging methods , 2009, The Lancet.

[15]  Michel Vert,et al.  Degradable polymers in a living environment: where do you end up?† , 2002 .

[16]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  A bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent system for patients with single de-novo coronary artery lesions (ABSORB): a prospective open-label trial , 2008, The Lancet.

[17]  M. Vert Bioabsorbable polymers in medicine: an overview. , 2009, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[18]  N. Krott,et al.  Long-term assessment of a novel biodegradable paclitaxel-eluting coronary polylactide stent. , 2004, European heart journal.

[19]  A. Lafont,et al.  A.R.T.: concept of a bioresorbable stent without drug elution. , 2009, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[20]  R. Virmani,et al.  Endothelial cell recovery between comparator polymer-based drug-eluting stents. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  Bernard Chevalier,et al.  Comparison of in vivo acute stent recoil between the bioabsorbable everolimus‐eluting coronary stent and the everolimus‐eluting cobalt chromium coronary stent: Insights from the ABSORB and SPIRIT trials , 2007, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[22]  E. Topol,et al.  Marked inflammatory sequelae to implantation of biodegradable and nonbiodegradable polymers in porcine coronary arteries. , 1996, Circulation.