Persistent Space Situational Awareness: Distributed Real-Time Awareness Global Network in Space (Dragnets)

Abstract : In the decades since the space program first began, the United States has become more and more dependent on space across a broad spectrum of military, commercial, and civil applications. That dependence brings with it an inherent vulnerability, and recent evidence of the growing threat, combined with acknowledged gaps that exist in our ability to rapidly characterize and attribute attacks on our satellites results in a compelling need for a robust space situational awareness (SSA) capability. The Distributed Real-time Awareness Global Network in Space (DRAGNETS) is one solution that leverages the trend toward distributed, networked military capabilities that nanotechnology will enable within the next 20 years. The DRAGNETS approach uses distributed constellations of thousands of very small sugar cube-sized "femtosats" to maintain continual cognizance of the space environment. Current and future advances in nanotechnology will lead to substantial miniaturization of satellite functions and allow the Air Force to field flexible, adaptive, and responsive systems as part of an overall SSA architecture. In order to realize the DRAGNETS vision, the Air Force should plan phased investments leading to an operational assessment of a prototype DRAGNETS constellation at a technology readiness level of 7 by 2025. The end result will be a capability that, when integrated with existing ground and space-based SSA assets, provides Combatant Commanders and senior decision makers with the necessary awareness to preserve maximum flexibility in the use of US space capabilities.

[1]  Matthew C. Rousu,et al.  Consumer's Resistance to Genetically Modified Foods: The Role of Information in an Uncertain Environment , 2004 .

[2]  Thomas M. Liu,et al.  Nanoparticle Electric Propulsion: Experimental Results , 2006 .

[3]  Trevor Sorensen,et al.  KUTESAT-2, A Student Nanosatellite Mission for Testing Rapid-Response Small Satellite Technologies in Low Earth Orbit , 2005 .

[4]  B. Landi,et al.  High Radiation Tolerance of Carbon Nanotube Matrices for Space Power Applications , 2004 .

[5]  R. Feynman A Quantum Information Science and Technology Roadmap Part 1 : Quantum Computation Report of the Quantum Information Science and Technology Experts Panel , 2004 .

[6]  Raymond J. Sedwick,et al.  Grand Challenges in Space Technology: Distributed Satellite Systems , 2001 .

[7]  S. Cass MEMS in space , 2001 .

[8]  N. Pan,et al.  High power density supercapacitors using locally aligned carbon nanotube electrodes , 2005 .

[9]  Richard Russell,et al.  Environmental Health and Safety Research Needs for Engineered Nanoscale Materials , 2006 .

[10]  Gang Chen,et al.  Nanophotonics — Quantum dots, photonic crystals, and optical silicon circuits: An excursion into the optical behavior of very small things , 2005, Bell Labs Technical Journal.

[11]  Celia Merzbacher,et al.  The National Nanotechnology Initiative: Research and Development Leading to a Revolution in Technology and Industry. Supplement to the President's FY 2008 Budget , 2007 .

[12]  Daniel J. Hughes The Iraq War: Strategy, Tactics, and Military Lessons , 2005 .

[13]  Iain McLean,et al.  State of the Union , 2005 .

[14]  Terrence W. Simon,et al.  6th International Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, IECEC , 2008 .

[15]  M. Hogan,et al.  The “Next Big Thing”:The Future of Diplomatic History in a Global Age , 2004 .

[16]  J. Ackermann,et al.  Analysis and Design , 1993 .

[17]  Rosalyn Berne 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act , 2005 .

[18]  James R. Wertz,et al.  Space Mission Analysis and Design , 1992 .

[19]  N. Weiss State of the Union – 2002 , 2002 .

[20]  David M. Berube,et al.  Nano-Hype: The Truth Behind the Nanotechnology Buzz , 2005 .

[21]  Andrew D. Ketsdever,et al.  Micropropulsion for small spacecraft , 2000 .

[22]  J. Galloway,et al.  The state of the union. , 1970, Lancet.