On the Proof Complexity of Paris-Harrington and Off-Diagonal Ramsey Tautologies

We study the proof complexity of Paris-Harrington’s Large Ramsey Theorem for bi-colorings of graphs and of off-diagonal Ramsey’s Theorem. For Paris-Harrington, we prove a non-trivial conditional lower bound in Resolution and a non-trivial upper bound in bounded-depth Frege. The lower bound is conditional on a (very reasonable) hardness assumption for a weak (quasi-polynomial) Pigeonhole principle in Res(2). We show that under such an assumption, there is no refutation of the Paris-Harrington formulas of size quasi-polynomial in the number of propositional variables. The proof technique for the lower bound extends the idea of using a combinatorial principle to blow up a counterexample for another combinatorial principle beyond the threshold of inconsistency. A strong link with the proof complexity of an unbalanced off-diagonal Ramsey principle is established. This is obtained by adapting some constructions due to Erdős and Mills. We prove a non-trivial Resolution lower bound for a family of such off-diagonal Ramsey principles.

[1]  George Mills,et al.  Ramsey-Paris-Harrington Numbers for Graphs , 1985, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A.

[2]  Jeong Han Kim,et al.  The Ramsey Number R(3, t) Has Order of Magnitude t2/log t , 1995, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[3]  Robert Moll,et al.  Examples of hard tautologies in the propositional calculus , 1981, STOC '81.

[4]  Johan Håstad,et al.  Almost optimal lower bounds for small depth circuits , 1986, STOC '86.

[5]  Samuel R. Buss,et al.  A Switching Lemma for Small Restrictions and Lower Bounds for k-DNF Resolution , 2004, SIAM J. Comput..

[6]  Samuel R. Buss,et al.  Switching lemma for small restrictions and lower bounds for k-DNF resolution , 2002, The 43rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2002. Proceedings..

[7]  J. Kraj On the Weak Pigeonhole Principle , 2001 .

[8]  Joel H. Spencer,et al.  Asymptotic lower bounds for Ramsey functions , 1977, Discret. Math..

[9]  J. Paris A Mathematical Incompleteness in Peano Arithmetic , 1977 .

[10]  János Komlós,et al.  A Note on Ramsey Numbers , 1980, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A.

[11]  Toniann Pitassi,et al.  A new proof of the weak pigeonhole principle , 2000, STOC '00.

[12]  P. Erdös,et al.  Graph Theory and Probability , 1959 .

[13]  Peter Clote,et al.  Cutting plane and Frege proofs , 1995, Inf. Comput..

[14]  Pavel Pudlák A lower bound on the size of resolution proofs of the Ramsey theorem , 2012, Inf. Process. Lett..

[15]  Hans Jürgen Prömel,et al.  Rapidly Growing Ramsey Functions , 2013 .

[16]  Alessandro Panconesi,et al.  Concentration of Measure for the Analysis of Randomized Algorithms , 2009 .

[17]  Jan Kraj́ıček,et al.  A note on propositional proof complexity of some Ramsey-type statements , 2011, Arch. Math. Log..

[18]  Paul Erdös,et al.  Some Bounds for the Ramsey-Paris-Harrington Numbers , 1981, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A.

[19]  Jussi KETONENt,et al.  Rapidly growing Ramsey functions , 1981 .

[20]  J. Nesetril,et al.  An unprovable Ramsey-type theorem , 1992 .

[21]  Samuel R. Buss,et al.  Separation results for the size of constant-depth propositional proofs , 2005, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[22]  Toniann Pitassi,et al.  Approximation and Small-Depth Frege Proofs , 1992, SIAM J. Comput..

[23]  Jan Kra,et al.  Lower Bounds to the Size of Constant-depth Propositional Proofs , 1994 .

[24]  P. Erdös Graph Theory and Probability. II , 1961, Canadian Journal of Mathematics.

[25]  Pavel Pudlák,et al.  Ramsey's Theorem in Bounded Arithmetic , 1990, CSL.

[26]  Jack E. Graver,et al.  Some graph theoretic results associated with Ramsey's theorem* , 1968 .

[27]  Alexander A. Razborov,et al.  Proof Complexity of Pigeonhole Principles , 2001, Developments in Language Theory.

[28]  Jeff B. Paris,et al.  Provability of the Pigeonhole Principle and the Existence of Infinitely Many Primes , 1988, J. Symb. Log..