Modelling agro-forestry scenarios for ammonia abatement in the landscape

Ammonia emissions from livestock production can have negative impacts on nearby protected sites and ecosystems that are sensitive to eutrophication and acidification. Trees are effective scavengers of both gaseous and particulate pollutants from the atmosphere making tree belts potentially effective landscape features to support strategies aiming to reduce ammonia impacts. This research used the MODDAS-THETIS a coupled turbulence and deposition turbulence model, to examine the relationships between tree canopy structure and ammonia capture for three source types—animal housing, slurry lagoon, and livestock under a tree canopy. By altering the canopy length, leaf area index, leaf area density, and height of the canopy in the model the capture efficiencies varied substantially. A maximum of 27% of the emitted ammonia was captured by tree canopy for the animal housing source, for the slurry lagoon the maximum was 19%, while the livestock under trees attained a maximum of 60% recapture. Using agro-forestry systems of differing tree structures near ‘hot spots’ of ammonia in the landscape could provide an effective abatement option for the livestock industry that complements existing source reduction measures.

[1]  S. Bremner,et al.  Sensitivity analysis 2 , 2015 .

[2]  A. Ditta.  How helpful is nanotechnology in agriculture? , 2012 .

[3]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Global projections for anthropogenic reactive nitrogen emissions to the atmosphere: An assessment of scenarios in the scientific literature , 2011 .

[4]  W. J. Bealey,et al.  The role of indicator choice in quantifying the threat of atmospheric ammonia to the ‘Natura 2000’ network , 2010 .

[5]  R. Massad,et al.  Review and parameterisation of bi-directional ammonia exchange between vegetation and the atmosphere , 2010 .

[6]  D. Chadwick,et al.  Inventory of ammonia emissions from UK agriculture 2009 , 2010 .

[7]  E. Davidson,et al.  Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: a synthesis. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[8]  M. Hassouna,et al.  Ammonia deposition near hot spots: processes, models and monitoring methods , 2009 .

[9]  G. Nabuurs,et al.  Ecologically implausible carbon response? , 2009, Nature.

[10]  M. Sutton,et al.  Atmospheric ammonia : detecting emission changes and environmental impacts : results of an expert workshop under the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution , 2009 .

[11]  A. Nordin,et al.  Ecophysiological adjustment of two Sphagnum species in response to anthropogenic nitrogen deposition. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[12]  F. Dentener,et al.  Ammonia in the environment: from ancient times to the present. , 2008, Environmental pollution.

[13]  Adrizal,et al.  The Potential for Plants to Trap Emissions from Farms with Laying Hens: 2. Ammonia and Dust , 2008 .

[14]  D. Fowler,et al.  Stress responses of Calluna vulgaris to reduced and oxidised N applied under 'real world conditions'. , 2008, Environmental pollution.

[15]  M R Ashmore,et al.  Reduced nitrogen has a greater effect than oxidised nitrogen on dry heathland vegetation. , 2008, Environmental pollution.

[16]  Adrizal,et al.  The Potential for Plants to Trap Emissions from Farms with Laying Hens. 1. Ammonia , 2008 .

[17]  G. Nabuurs,et al.  Ecologically implausible carbon response? , 2008, Nature.

[18]  J. Galloway,et al.  Reduced nitrogen in ecology and the environment. , 2007, Environmental pollution.

[19]  Mark R. Theobald,et al.  The potential for spatial planning at the landscape level to mitigate the effects of atmospheric ammonia deposition , 2006 .

[20]  B. Loubet,et al.  A coupled dispersion and exchange model for short‐range dry deposition of atmospheric ammonia , 2006 .

[21]  J. Stedman,et al.  Assessment of the environmental impacts associated with the UK Air Quality Strategy , 2006 .

[22]  S. Dupont,et al.  Simulation of Turbulent Flow in An Urban Forested Park Damaged by a Windstorm , 2006 .

[23]  Yves Brunet,et al.  A Fine-Scale k−ε Model for Atmospheric Flow over Heterogeneous Landscapes , 2005 .

[24]  E. Nemitz,et al.  Measuring Aerosol and Heavy Metal Deposition on Urban Woodland and Grass Using Inventories of 210Pb and Metal Concentrations in Soil , 2004 .

[25]  Marian Stamp Dawkins,et al.  What makes free-range broiler chickens range? In situ measurement of habitat preference , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  S. Krupa.  Effects of atmospheric ammonia (NH3) on terrestrial vegetation: a review. , 2003, Environmental pollution.

[27]  Martin Gallagher,et al.  Measurements and parameterizations of small aerosol deposition velocities to grassland, arable crops, and forest: Influence of surface roughness length on deposition , 2002 .

[28]  R. Wal,et al.  Effects of nitrogen deposition on growth and survival of montane Racomitrium lanuginosum heath , 2002 .

[29]  M. Sutton,et al.  Potential for Ammonia Recapture by Farm Woodlands: Design and Application of a New Experimental Facility , 2001, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[30]  Gail Taylor,et al.  Particulate pollution capture by urban trees: effect of species and windspeed , 2000 .

[31]  Benjamin Loubet.  Modélisation du dépôt sec d'ammoniac atmosphérique à proximité des sources , 2000 .

[32]  Jan G. M. Roelofs,et al.  The effects of air‐borne nitrogen pollutants on species diversity in natural and semi‐natural European vegetation , 1998 .

[33]  D. Fowler,et al.  The relationship between nitrogen deposition, species composition and foliar nitrogen concentrations in woodland flora in the vicinity of livestock farms , 1998 .

[34]  D. Chadwick,et al.  Inventory of Ammonia Emissions from UK Agriculture , 1996 .

[35]  A. J. Janssen,et al.  Modelled historical concentrations and depositions of ammonia and ammonium in Europe , 1988 .