Post-operative sensitivity and posterior composite resin restorations: a review

Abstract: With an increasing use of posterior composite resin restorations, the incidence of post-operative sensitivity has become an everyday clinical problem. The aim of this paper is to identify the possible causes of post-operative sensitivity and explore how it can be avoided and treated. CPD/Clinical Relevance: This paper addresses the different causes responsible for post-operative sensitivity following composite placement. Also the management of this situation is discussed.

[1]  R. McConnell,et al.  Posterior composites: Update on cavities and filling techniques. , 2017, Journal of dentistry.

[2]  P. Brunton,et al.  Bulk dentine replacement versus incrementally placed resin composite: A randomised controlled clinical trial. , 2016, Journal of dentistry.

[3]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Polymerization stress--is it clinically meaningful? , 2016, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[4]  A. Reis,et al.  Does the adhesive strategy influence the post-operative sensitivity in adult patients with posterior resin composite restorations?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[5]  M. Kuga,et al.  Cuspal movement related to different polymerization protocols. , 2014, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[6]  V. Vinod,et al.  Effectiveness of desensitizing agents in relieving the pre- and postcementation sensitivity for full coverage restorations: a clinical evaluation. , 2013, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[7]  AbdelRahman A. AbdelRahman,et al.  Job Satisfaction among Expatriate and National Employees in an Arabian Gulf Context , 2012 .

[8]  N. Ilie,et al.  In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites , 2012, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[9]  E. Bronkhorst,et al.  12-year Survival of Composite vs. Amalgam Restorations , 2010, Journal of dental research.

[10]  M. Swain,et al.  A suitable base material for composite resin restorations: zinc oxide eugenol. , 2010, Journal of dentistry.

[11]  E. Piva,et al.  Effects of metallic or translucent matrices for class II composite restorations: 4-year clinical follow-up findings , 2011, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[12]  H. Messer,et al.  Effect of glass-ionomer cement lining on postoperative sensitivity in occlusal cavities restored with resin composite--a randomized clinical trial. , 2009, Operative dentistry.

[13]  M. Wolkewitz,et al.  Occurrence and causing stimuli of postoperative sensitivity in composite restorations. , 2009, Operative dentistry.

[14]  H. D. Arısu,et al.  Effect of multiple consecutive applications of one-step self-etch adhesive on microtensile bond strength. , 2009, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[15]  H. Schaller,et al.  Effects of the desensitizing agents Gluma and Hyposen on the tensile bond strength of dentin adhesives. , 2008, American journal of dentistry.

[16]  E. Swift,et al.  36-month clinical evaluation of two adhesives and microhybrid resin composites in Class I restorations. , 2008, American journal of dentistry.

[17]  M. Brackett,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the soft-start (pulse-delay) polymerization technique in Class I and II composite restorations. , 2008, Operative dentistry.

[18]  Q. Alomari,et al.  Effect of LED curing modes on postoperative sensitivity after Class II resin composite restorations. , 2007, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[19]  G. Ambrosano,et al.  Clinical assessment of postoperative sensitivity in posterior composite restorations. , 2007, Operative dentistry.

[20]  W. Palin,et al.  Investigation of polymerisation shrinkage strain, associated cuspal movement and microleakage of MOD cavities restored incrementally with resin-based composite using an LED light curing unit. , 2007, Journal of dentistry.

[21]  A. Reis,et al.  A 24-month follow-up of flowable resin composite as an intermediate layer in non-carious cervical lesions. , 2006, Operative dentistry.

[22]  C. Dörter,et al.  Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer and nanofill composite with and without a flowable liner. , 2006, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[23]  B. Peretz,et al.  The effect of an intermediate layer of flowable composite resin on microleakage in packable composite restorations. , 2005, International journal of paediatric dentistry.

[24]  N. Garone-Netto,et al.  Prevention of postoperative tooth sensitivity: a preliminary clinical trial. , 2005, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[25]  F. Tay,et al.  Effects of multiple coatings of two all-in-one adhesives on dentin bonding. , 2005, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[26]  P. Hörstedt,et al.  In vivo interfacial adaptation of class II resin composite restorations with and without a flowable resin composite liner , 2005, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[27]  G. Fleming,et al.  Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with posterior filling materials of varying reported volumetric shrinkage values. , 2005, Journal of dentistry.

[28]  J. Hodges,et al.  Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive: effect on postoperative sensitivity. , 2003, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[29]  D. Bardwell,et al.  An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations. , 2002, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[30]  J. Knowles,et al.  The effects of oxalate-containing products on the exposed dentine surface: an SEM investigation. , 2001, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[31]  E. Akpata,et al.  Post-operative sensitivity in glass-ionomer versus adhesive resin-lined posterior composites. , 2001, American journal of dentistry.

[32]  A. Akamine,et al.  Composite resin restoration and postoperative sensitivity: clinical follow-up in an undergraduate program. , 2001, Journal of dentistry.

[33]  M. Aarnts,et al.  Developments in shrinkage control of adhesive restoratives. , 2000, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[34]  T. Watson,et al.  Dentine caries: take it or leave it? , 2000, Dental update.

[35]  M. Addy,et al.  Dentine hypersensitivity - an enigma? A review of terminology, mechanisms, aetiology and management. , 1999 .

[36]  M. Addy,et al.  dentine hypersensitivity: Dentine hypersensitivity — an enigma? a review of terminology, mechanisms, aetiology and management , 1999, British Dental Journal.

[37]  D. Pashley,et al.  Effects of oxalate on dentin bonding. , 1993, American journal of dentistry.

[38]  D. Pashley,et al.  Dentinal tubule occlusion and root hypersensitivity. , 1991, Journal of periodontology.

[39]  C. Davidson,et al.  Setting Stress in Composite Resin in Relation to Configuration of the Restoration , 1987, Journal of dental research.

[40]  L ZACH,et al.  PULP RESPONSE TO EXTERNALLY APPLIED HEAT. , 1965, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[41]  M. Brännström.  The elicitation of pain in human dentine and pulp by chemical stimuli. , 1962 .