Eccentric perception of biological motion is unscalably poor

Accurately perceiving the activities of other people is a crucially important social skill of obvious survival value. Human vision is equipped with highly sensitive mechanisms for recognizing activities performed by others [Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 201; Johansson, G. (1976). Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception: An experimental and theoretical analysis of calculus-like functions in visual data processing. Psychological Research, 38, 379]. One putative functional role of biological motion perception is to register the presence of biological events anywhere within the visual field, not just within central vision. To assess the salience of biological motion throughout the visual field, we compared the detectability performances of biological motion animations imaged in central vision and in peripheral vision. To compensate for the poorer spatial resolution within the periphery, we spatially magnified the motion tokens defining biological motion. Normal and scrambled biological motion sequences were embedded in motion noise and presented in two successively viewed intervals on each trial (2AFC). Subjects indicated which of the two intervals contained normal biological motion. A staircase procedure varied the number of noise dots to produce a criterion level of discrimination performance. For both foveal and peripheral viewing, performance increased but saturated with stimulus size. Foveal and peripheral performance could not be equated by any magnitude of size scaling. Moreover, the inversion effect--superiority of upright over inverted biological motion [Sumi, S. (1984). Upside-down presentation of the Johansson moving light-spot pattern. Perception, 13, 283]--was found only when animations were viewed within the central visual field. Evidently the neural resource responsible for biological motion perception are embodied within neural mechanisms focused on central vision.

[1]  S. Lea,et al.  Perception of Emotion from Dynamic Point-Light Displays Represented in Dance , 1996, Perception.

[2]  Robert F. Hess,et al.  The coding of spatial position by the human visual system: Effects of spatial scale and retinal eccentricity , 1994, Vision Research.

[3]  P. Bennett,et al.  Inversion Leads to Quantitative, Not Qualitative, Changes in Face Processing , 2004, Current Biology.

[4]  J. Robson,et al.  Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field , 1981, Vision Research.

[5]  David Whitaker,et al.  The influence of eccentricity on position and movement acuities as revealed by spatial scaling , 1992, Vision Research.

[6]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display , 1977 .

[7]  M. A. Bouman,et al.  Perimetry of contrast detection thresholds of moving spatial sine wave patterns. III. The target extent as a sensitivity controlling parameter. , 1978, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[8]  R. F. Hess,et al.  The contrast sensitivity gradient across the human visual field: With emphasis on the low spatial frequency range , 1989, Vision Research.

[9]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Active versus passive processing of biological motion , 2002, Perception.

[10]  J. Rovamo,et al.  An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  J. Freyd,et al.  Configural processing in the perception of apparent biological motion. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Perception of biological motion in parietal patients , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  D. Burr,et al.  Discrimination of spatial phase in central and peripheral vision , 1989, Vision Research.

[14]  Armin Bruderlin,et al.  Perceiving affect from arm movement , 2001, Cognition.

[15]  K. Verfaillie.  Perceiving Human Locomotion: Priming Effects in Direction Discrimination , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[16]  J E Cutting,et al.  Masking the motions of human gait , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Perimetry of contrast detection thresholds of moving spatial sine wave patterns. II. The far peripheral visual field (eccentricity 0°–50°) , 1978 .

[18]  Bettina L. Beard,et al.  Vernier Acuity with Non-simultaneous Targets: The Cortical Magnification Factor Estimated by Psychophysics , 1997, Vision Research.

[19]  David Whitaker,et al.  Spatial scaling of vernier acuity tasks , 1992, Vision Research.

[20]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[21]  S. Carey,et al.  From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. , 1977, Science.

[22]  M. J. Wright,et al.  Matching velocity in central and peripheral vision , 1986, Vision Research.

[23]  J. Cutting.  Generation of Synthetic Male and Female Walkers through Manipulation of a Biomechanical Invariant , 1978, Perception.

[24]  M. Farah,et al.  What causes the face inversion effect? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  David C. Burr,et al.  Seeing biological motion , 1998, Nature.

[26]  M J Wright,et al.  Spatiotemporal properties of grating motion detection in the center and the periphery of the visual field. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[27]  G Johansson,et al.  Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception , 1976, Psychological research.

[28]  Sung-Bae Cho,et al.  Estimating the efficiency of recognizing gender and affect from biological motion , 2002, Vision Research.

[29]  T. Poggio,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  E. Peli,et al.  Contour integration in peripheral vision reduces gradually with eccentricity , 2003, Vision Research.

[31]  Dean R. Melmoth,et al.  Scaling of letter size and contrast equalises perception across eccentricities and set sizes , 2003, Vision Research.

[32]  J A Beintema,et al.  Perception of biological motion without local image motion , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues , 1977 .

[34]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attention-based visual routines: sprites , 2001, Cognition.

[35]  Marina Pavlova,et al.  Prior Knowledge about Display Inversion in Biological Motion Perception , 2003, Perception.

[36]  Nikolaus F Troje,et al.  Reference Frames for Orientation Anisotropies in Face Recognition and Biological-Motion Perception , 2003, Perception.

[37]  S. Sumi.  Upside-down Presentation of the Johansson Moving Light-Spot Pattern , 1984, Perception.

[38]  D. Whitteridge,et al.  The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[39]  F. Pollick,et al.  Exaggerating Temporal Differences Enhances Recognition of Individuals from Point Light Displays , 2000, Psychological science.

[40]  M. Banks,et al.  The effects of contrast, spatial scale, and orientation on foveal and peripheral phase discrimination , 1991, Vision Research.

[41]  M. Pavlova,et al.  Orientation specificity in biological motion perception , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  G. Mather,et al.  Gender discrimination in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  J. Kaas,et al.  The Primate visual system , 2003 .

[44]  Q. Vuong,et al.  Incidental Processing of Biological Motion , 2004, Current Biology.

[45]  Paul V McGraw,et al.  Vernier and contrast discrimination in central and peripheral vision , 2000, Vision Research.

[46]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[47]  G. Johansson.  Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[48]  S. Klein,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification , 1985, Vision Research.

[49]  J Rovamo,et al.  Analysis of spatial structure in eccentric vision. , 1989, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[50]  J. Rovamo,et al.  The effects of eccentricity and stimulus magnification on simultaneous performance in position and movement acuity tasks , 1997, Vision Research.

[51]  G. Westheimer.  The spatial grain of the perifoveal visual field , 1982, Vision Research.

[52]  A B Watson,et al.  Estimation of local spatial scale. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[53]  R. Hess,et al.  Human peripheral spatial resolution for achromatic and chromatic stimuli: limits imposed by optical and retinal factors. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[54]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  The visual perception of human locomotion. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[55]  Robert F Hess,et al.  Contour integration in the peripheral field , 1999, Vision Research.

[56]  I. Rentschler,et al.  Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[57]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Absence of contour linking in peripheral vision , 1997, Nature.

[58]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Revisiting the Perception of Upside-Down Faces , 2000, Psychological science.

[59]  Bennett I. Bertenthal,et al.  Global Processing of Biological Motions , 1994 .

[60]  R. Blake,et al.  Perception of Biological Motion , 1997, Perception.

[61]  T. Shipley.  The Effect of Object and Event Orientation on Perception of Biological Motion , 2003, Psychological science.

[62]  M. Banks,et al.  Sensitivity loss in odd-symmetric mechanisms and phase anomalies in peripheral vision , 1987, Nature.

[63]  H T Kukkonen,et al.  Scaling Extrafoveal Detection of Distortion in a Face and Grating , 2000, Perception.

[64]  B. T. Barrett,et al.  Discriminating mirror symmetry in foveal and extra-foveal vision , 1999, Vision Research.

[65]  H Strasburger,et al.  Cortical Magnification Theory Fails to Predict Visual Recognition , 1994, The European journal of neuroscience.

[66]  H Strasburger,et al.  Contrast‐dependent Dissociation of Visual Recognition and Detection Fields , 1996, The European journal of neuroscience.

[67]  K. Verfaillie.  Orientation-dependent priming effects in the perception of biological motion. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[68]  G. Mather,et al.  Low-level visual processing of biological motion , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[69]  Jyrki Rovamo,et al.  Identification of facial images in peripheral vision , 2001, Vision Research.

[70]  D. H. Kelly.  Retinal inhomogeneity. I. Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.