Motion parallax in stereo 3D

Binocular disparity is the main depth cue that makes stereoscopic images appear 3D. However, in many scenarios, the range of depth that can be reproduced by this cue is greatly limited and typically fixed due to constraints imposed by displays. For example, due to the low angular resolution of current automultiscopic screens, they can only reproduce a shallow depth range. In this work, we study the motion parallax cue, which is a relatively strong depth cue, and can be freely reproduced even on a 2D screen without any limits. We exploit the fact that in many practical scenarios, motion parallax provides sufficiently strong depth information that the presence of binocular depth cues can be reduced through aggressive disparity compression. To assess the strength of the effect we conduct psycho-visual experiments that measure the influence of motion parallax on depth perception and relate it to the depth resulting from binocular disparity. Based on the measurements, we propose a joint disparity-parallax computational model that predicts apparent depth resulting from both cues. We demonstrate how this model can be applied in the context of stereo and multiscopic image processing, and propose new disparity manipulation techniques, which first quantify depth obtained from motion parallax, and then adjust binocular disparity information accordingly. This allows us to manipulate the disparity signal according to the strength of motion parallax to improve the overall depth reproduction. This technique is validated in additional experiments.

[1]  Fulvio Domini,et al.  Stereo and motion information are not independently processed by the visual system , 2006, Vision Research.

[2]  Tom Banton,et al.  Background Perceived depth is enhanced with parallax scanning , .

[3]  S Ullman,et al.  Maximizing Rigidity: The Incremental Recovery of 3-D Structure from Rigid and Nonrigid Motion , 1984, Perception.

[4]  FattalRaanan,et al.  Gradient domain high dynamic range compression , 2002 .

[5]  Matthias Zwicker,et al.  Optimizing stereo‐to‐multiview conversion for autostereoscopic displays , 2014, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[6]  G Westheimer,et al.  Population distribution of stereoscopic ability , 1993, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[7]  H. Ono,et al.  Depth perception as a function of motion parallax and absolute-distance information. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  A perceptual model for disparity , 2011, ACM Trans. Graph..

[9]  Markus H. Gross,et al.  OSCAM - optimized stereoscopic camera control for interactive 3D , 2011, ACM Trans. Graph..

[10]  Gordon Wetzstein,et al.  Display adaptive 3D content remapping , 2013, Comput. Graph..

[11]  Mark Nawrot,et al.  Modeling depth from motion parallax with the motion/pursuit ratio , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[12]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  Adaptive Image-space Stereo View Synthesis , 2010, VMV.

[13]  Mark Nawrot,et al.  The motion/pursuit law for visual depth perception from motion parallax , 2009, Vision Research.

[14]  Thomas Brox,et al.  High Accuracy Optical Flow Estimation Based on a Theory for Warping , 2004, ECCV.

[15]  Keith Langley,et al.  Surface orientation, modulation frequency and the detection and perception of depth defined by binocular disparity and motion parallax , 2006, Vision Research.

[16]  GutierrezDiego,et al.  Special Section on Advanced Displays , 2013 .

[17]  Keith Stroyan,et al.  Motion Parallax is Asymptotic to Binocular Disparity , 2010, 1010.0575.

[18]  Joachim Weickert,et al.  Universität Des Saarlandes Fachrichtung 6.1 – Mathematik Optic Flow in Harmony Optic Flow in Harmony Optic Flow in Harmony , 2022 .

[19]  Fulvio Domini,et al.  The relation between disparity and velocity signals of rigidly moving objects constrains depth order perception , 2007, Vision Research.

[20]  B. Rogers,et al.  Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception , 1982, Vision Research.

[21]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Chapter 3 – Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances: The Integration, Relative Potency, and Contextual Use of Different Information about Depth* , 1995 .

[22]  J. Aloimonos,et al.  On the kinetic depth effect , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[23]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  A luminance-contrast-aware disparity model and applications , 2012, ACM Trans. Graph..

[24]  M. Landy,et al.  A perturbation analysis of depth perception from combinations of texture and motion cues , 1993, Vision Research.

[25]  Dani Lischinski,et al.  Gradient Domain High Dynamic Range Compression , 2023 .

[26]  G J Andersen,et al.  Relationship between binocular disparity and motion parallax in surface detection , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Discriminating rigid from nonrigid motion: Minimum points and views , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  David M. Hoffman,et al.  Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[29]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Computer Vision - Algorithms and Applications , 2011, Texts in Computer Science.

[30]  Christine D. Piatko,et al.  A visibility matching tone reproduction operator for high dynamic range scenes , 1997, SIGGRAPH '97.

[31]  Amitabh Varshney,et al.  Kinetic depth images: flexible generation of depth perception , 2017, The Visual Computer.

[32]  B. Rogers,et al.  The Interaction of Binocular Disparity and Motion Parallax in the Computation of Depth , 1996, Vision Research.

[33]  Gordon Wetzstein,et al.  A survey on computational displays: Pushing the boundaries of optics, computation, and perception , 2013, Comput. Graph..

[34]  S. McKee,et al.  The detection of motion in the peripheral visual field , 1984, Vision Research.

[35]  Mtm Marc Lambooij,et al.  Visual Discomfort and Visual Fatigue of Stereoscopic Displays: A Review , 2009 .

[36]  Martin S Banks,et al.  Temporal presentation protocols in stereoscopic displays: Flicker visibility, perceived motion, and perceived depth , 2011, Journal of the Society for Information Display.

[37]  M. Gross,et al.  Nonlinear disparity mapping for stereoscopic 3D , 2010, ACM Trans. Graph..

[38]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  Apparent stereo: the Cornsweet illusion can enhance perceived depth , 2012, Electronic Imaging.

[39]  D R Proffitt,et al.  Comparing depth from motion with depth from binocular disparity. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  Frédo Durand,et al.  Antialiasing for automultiscopic 3D displays , 2006, EGSR '06.

[41]  Karl Kral,et al.  Behavioural–analytical studies of the role of head movements in depth perception in insects, birds and mammals , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[42]  Markus H. Gross,et al.  Stereo from Shading , 2015, EGSR.

[43]  F. Campbell,et al.  The influence of spatial frequency and contrast on the perception of moving patterns , 1981, Vision Research.

[44]  M. Lazarides Perceiving depth , 1991, Nature.

[45]  Gordon Wetzstein,et al.  Tensor displays , 2012, ACM Trans. Graph..

[46]  M. Landy,et al.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion , 1995, Vision Research.

[47]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Peripheral positional acuity: Retinal and cortical constraints on 2-dot separation discrimination under photopic and scotopic conditions , 1989, Vision Research.

[48]  Mark F. Bradshaw,et al.  Sensitivity to horizontal and vertical corrugations defined by binocular disparity , 1999, Vision Research.