Circuit-based models of shared variability in cortical networks

Trial-to-trial variability is a reflection of the circuitry and cellular physiology that makeup a neuronal network. A pervasive yet puzzling feature of cortical circuits is that despite their complex wiring, population-wide shared spiking variability is low dimensional with all neurons fluctuating en masse. Previous model cortical networks are at loss to explain this global variability, and rather assume it is from external sources. We show that if the spatial and temporal scales of inhibitory coupling match known physiology, model spiking neurons internally generate low dimensional shared variability that captures the properties of in vivo population recordings along the visual pathway. Shifting spatial attention into the receptive field of visual neurons has been shown to reduce low dimensional shared variability within a brain area, yet increase the variability shared between areas. A top-down modulation of inhibitory neurons in our network provides a parsimonious mechanism for this attentional modulation, providing support for our theory of cortical variability. Our work provides a critical and previously missing mechanistic link between observed cortical circuit structure and realistic population-wide shared neuronal variability and its modulation.

[1]  Sonja Grün,et al.  Computational Neuroscience: Mathematical and Statistical Perspectives. , 2018, Annual review of statistics and its application.

[2]  M. Carandini,et al.  The Nature of Shared Cortical Variability , 2015, Neuron.

[3]  Tatsuo K Sato,et al.  Traveling Waves in Visual Cortex , 2012, Neuron.

[4]  Brent Doiron,et al.  Scaling Properties of Dimensionality Reduction for Neural Populations and Network Models , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[5]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Attention stabilizes the shared gain of V4 populations , 2015, eLife.

[6]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers SECOND EDITION , 2021 .

[7]  Brent Doiron,et al.  Attentional modulation of neuronal variability in circuit models of cortex , 2017, eLife.

[8]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Cellular and network mechanisms of slow oscillatory activity (<1 Hz) and wave propagations in a cortical network model. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  Dimensionality reduction for large-scale neural recordings , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  F. Wolf,et al.  Dynamic Flux Tubes Form Reservoirs of Stability in Neuronal Circuits , 2012 .

[11]  Albert Compte,et al.  Sensory integration dynamics in a hierarchical network explains choice probabilities in cortical area MT , 2015, Nature Communications.

[12]  M. Cross,et al.  Pattern formation outside of equilibrium , 1993 .

[13]  Alexander S. Ecker,et al.  State Dependence of Noise Correlations in Macaque Primary Visual Cortex , 2014, Neuron.

[14]  M. Carandini,et al.  Cortical State Determines Global Variability and Correlations in Visual Cortex , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Peter Davidson,et al.  Turbulence: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers , 2015 .

[16]  Amy M. Ni,et al.  Learning and attention reveal a general relationship between population activity and behavior , 2018, Science.

[17]  B. Ermentrout.  Neural networks as spatio-temporal pattern-forming systems , 1998 .

[18]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Stimulus-dependent variability and noise correlations in cortical MT neurons , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Gabriel Kreiman,et al.  Bottom-Up and Top-Down Input Augment the Variability of Cortical Neurons , 2016, Neuron.

[20]  M. Goldman,et al.  Balanced Cortical Microcircuitry for Spatial Working Memory Based on Corrective Feedback Control , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Nicholas A. Steinmetz,et al.  Diverse coupling of neurons to populations in sensory cortex , 2015, Nature.

[22]  D. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Orientation Selectivity and the Arrangement of Horizontal Connections in Tree Shrew Striate Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Brent Doiron,et al.  The mechanics of state-dependent neural correlations , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  M. Cohen,et al.  Measuring and interpreting neuronal correlations , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  A. Reyes,et al.  Spatial Profile of Excitatory and Inhibitory Synaptic Connectivity in Mouse Primary Auditory Cortex , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Tai Sing Lee,et al.  Local field potentials indicate network state and account for neuronal response variability , 2010, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[27]  P. Dayan,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S9 References the Asynchronous State in Cortical Circuits , 2022 .

[28]  Adrian G Bondy,et al.  Feedback Determines the Structure of Correlated Variability in Primary Visual Cortex , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  W. Newsome,et al.  The Variable Discharge of Cortical Neurons: Implications for Connectivity, Computation, and Information Coding , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Attention improves performance primarily by reducing interneuronal correlations , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  H. Sompolinsky,et al.  Chaos in Neuronal Networks with Balanced Excitatory and Inhibitory Activity , 1996, Science.

[32]  Douglas A Ruff,et al.  Attention Increases Spike Count Correlations between Visual Cortical Areas , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Guillaume Hennequin,et al.  Stabilized supralinear network dynamics account for stimulus-induced changes of noise variability in the cortex , 2016, bioRxiv.

[34]  Maneesh Sahani,et al.  Inhibitory control of correlated intrinsic variability in cortical networks , 2016 .

[35]  Vivien A. Casagrande,et al.  Biophysics of Computation: Information Processing in Single Neurons , 1999 .

[36]  Taylor W. Schmitz,et al.  Normalization and the Cholinergic Microcircuit: A Unified Basis for Attention , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Prefrontal Parvalbumin Neurons in Control of Attention , 2016, Cell.

[38]  Peter E Latham.  Correlations demystified , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  Robert Rosenbaum,et al.  Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Reliable Computations in Recurrent Spiking Neural Networks. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[40]  Grace W. Lindsay,et al.  Parallel processing by cortical inhibition enables context-dependent behavior , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  D. Amit,et al.  Model of global spontaneous activity and local structured activity during delay periods in the cerebral cortex. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  M. London,et al.  Sensitivity to perturbations in vivo implies high noise and suggests rate coding in cortex , 2010, Nature.

[43]  Brent Doiron,et al.  Neural Correlation Is Stimulus Modulated by Feedforward Inhibitory Circuitry , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  Pulin Gong,et al.  Propagating Waves Can Explain Irregular Neural Dynamics , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Using Neuronal Populations to Study the Mechanisms Underlying Spatial and Feature Attention , 2011, Neuron.

[46]  B. Doiron,et al.  Balanced Networks of Spiking Neurons with Spatially Dependent Recurrent Connections , 2013, 1308.6014.

[47]  M. A. Smith,et al.  The spatial structure of correlated neuronal variability , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  Alexander S. Ecker,et al.  On the Structure of Neuronal Population Activity under Fluctuations in Attentional State , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Spatial Embedding and Wiring Cost Constrain the Functional Layout of the Cortical Network of Rodents and Primates , 2016, PLoS biology.

[50]  M. Sur,et al.  Invariant computations in local cortical networks with balanced excitation and inhibition , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.