Cyclophilin A Inhibition: Targeting Transition-State-Bound Enzyme Conformations for Structure-Based Drug Design

Human Cyclophilin A (CypA) catalyzes cis-trans isomerization of the prolyl peptide ω-bond in proteins and is involved in many subcellular processes. CypA has, therefore, been identified as a potential drug target in many diseases, and the development of potent inhibitors with high selectivity is a key objective. In computer-aided drug design, selectivity is improved by taking into account the inherent flexibility of the receptor. However, the relevant receptor conformations to focus on in order to develop highly selective inhibitors are not always obvious from available X-ray crystal structures or ensemble of conformations generated using molecular dynamics simulations. Here, we show that the conformation of the active site of CypA varies as the substrate configuration changes during catalytic turnover. We have analyzed the principal modes of the active site dynamics of CypA from molecular dynamics simulations to show that similar ensembles of enzyme conformations recognize diverse inhibitors and bind the different configurations of the peptide substrate. Small nonpeptidomimetic inhibitors with varying activity are recognized by enzyme ensembles that are similar to those that tightly bind the transition state and cis configurations of the substrate. Our results suggest that enzyme-substrate ensembles are more relevant in structure-based drug design for CypA than free enzyme. Of the vast conformational space of the free enzyme, the enzyme conformations of the tightly bound enzyme-substrate complexes are the most important for catalysis. Therefore, functionalizing lead compounds to optimize their interactions with the enzyme's conformational ensemble bound to the substrate in the cis or the transition state could lead to more potent inhibitors.

[1]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Improving database enrichment through ensemble docking , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[2]  D. Hamelberg,et al.  Reoptimization of the AMBER force field parameters for peptide bond (Omega) torsions using accelerated molecular dynamics. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[3]  Boris Schmidt,et al.  Ensemble‐Docking Approach on BACE‐1: Pharmacophore Perception and Guidelines for Drug Design , 2007, ChemMedChem.

[4]  Luhua Lai,et al.  Discovering potent small molecule inhibitors of cyclophilin A using de novo drug design approach. , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[5]  S. Constant,et al.  Isoform-specific inhibition of cyclophilins. , 2009, Biochemistry.

[6]  M. Crompton,et al.  Cyclophilin-A is involved in excitotoxin-induced caspase activation in rat neuronal B50 cells. , 2002, The Biochemical journal.

[7]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[8]  Nolan H. Sigal,et al.  A cytosolic binding protein for the immunosuppressant FK506 has peptidyl-prolyl isomerase activity but is distinct from cyclophilin , 1989, Nature.

[9]  G. Fischer,et al.  Prolyl cis/trans isomerase signalling pathways in cancer. , 2011, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[10]  W. Sundquist,et al.  Crystal structure of cyclophilin A complexed with a binding site peptide from the HIV‐1 capsid protein , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[11]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Mechanistic Insight into the Role of Transition-State Stabilization in Cyclophilin A , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[12]  PatrickY.-S. Lam,et al.  Rational design of potent, bioavailable, nonpeptide cyclic ureas as HIV protease inhibitors. , 1994, Science.

[13]  G. Bepler,et al.  Translating biomarkers into clinical practice: prognostic implications of cyclophilin A and macrophage migratory inhibitory factor identified from protein expression profiles in non-small cell lung cancer. , 2004, Lung cancer.

[14]  T. Kiefhaber,et al.  Cyclophilin and peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase are probably identical proteins , 1989, Nature.

[15]  X. Zou,et al.  Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: Considering protein structural variations in molecular docking , 2006, Proteins.

[16]  Stewart A. Adcock,et al.  Molecular dynamics: survey of methods for simulating the activity of proteins. , 2006, Chemical reviews.

[17]  Donald Hamelberg,et al.  Resolving the complex role of enzyme conformational dynamics in catalytic function , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Andrzej Galat,et al.  Peptidylprolyl cis/trans isomerases (immunophilins): biological diversity--targets--functions. , 2003, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[19]  Jung-Hsin Lin,et al.  Optimization and Computational Evaluation of a Series of Potential Active Site Inhibitors of the V82F/I84V Drug‐resistant Mutant of HIV‐1 Protease: an Application of the Relaxed Complex Method of Structure‐based Drug Design , 2006, Chemical biology & drug design.

[20]  N. Vermeulen,et al.  The role of water molecules in computational drug design. , 2010, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[21]  P. Kollman,et al.  A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .

[22]  J. Tainer,et al.  Screening a peptidyl database for potential ligands to proteins with side‐chain flexibility , 1998, Proteins.

[23]  M. Navia,et al.  Enthalpy of hydrogen bond formation in a protein-ligand binding reaction. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  W Patrick Walters,et al.  A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance , 2004, Proteins.

[25]  P. Kollman,et al.  Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. , 2000, Accounts of chemical research.

[26]  Orlando Acevedo,et al.  Identification of HIV inhibitors guided by free energy perturbation calculations. , 2012, Current pharmaceutical design.

[27]  P. Taylor,et al.  Structures of immunophilins and their ligand complexes. , 2003, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[28]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Computational drug design accommodating receptor flexibility: the relaxed complex scheme. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[29]  Chao-Yie Yang,et al.  Binding free energy contributions of interfacial waters in HIV-1 protease/inhibitor complexes. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[30]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Enzyme dynamics point to stepwise conformational selection in catalysis. , 2010, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[31]  Orlando Acevedo,et al.  Computational Insight into Small Molecule Inhibition of Cyclophilins , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[32]  Jeremy Luban,et al.  Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Gag protein binds to cyclophilins A and B , 1993, Cell.

[33]  Leslie A Kuhn,et al.  Modeling correlated main‐chain motions in proteins for flexible molecular recognition , 2004, Proteins.

[34]  Hege S. Beard,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[35]  W. L. Jorgensen The Many Roles of Computation in Drug Discovery , 2004, Science.

[36]  Cheng Luo,et al.  Nucleocapsid protein of SARS coronavirus tightly binds to human cyclophilin A , 2004, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications - BBRC.

[37]  Kengo Morimoto,et al.  Cyclosporine induces cancer progression by a cell-autonomous mechanism , 1999, Nature.

[38]  W. E. Lyons,et al.  The immunophilins, FK506 binding protein and cyclophilin, are discretely localized in the brain: relationship to calcineurin , 1994, Neuroscience.

[39]  B. Shoichet,et al.  Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[40]  W. Sundquist,et al.  Crystal Structure of Human Cyclophilin A Bound to the Amino-Terminal Domain of HIV-1 Capsid , 1996, Cell.

[41]  T. Moeller,et al.  Synthesis and biological evaluation of non-peptidic cyclophilin ligands. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[42]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[43]  Yuquan Wei,et al.  Proteomics Identification of Cyclophilin A as a Potential Prognostic Factor and Therapeutic Target in Endometrial Carcinoma* , 2008, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[44]  G. Basarab,et al.  Structure-based design of potent inhibitors of scytalone dehydratase: displacement of a water molecule from the active site. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[45]  James Andrew McCammon,et al.  Predictive Power of Molecular Dynamics Receptor Structures in Virtual Screening , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[46]  Jonathan W. Essex,et al.  Ensemble Docking into Multiple Crystallographically Derived Protein Structures: An Evaluation Based on the Statistical Analysis of Enrichments , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[47]  Francesco Senia,et al.  Sanglifehrin-cyclophilin interaction: degradation work, synthetic macrocyclic analogues, X-ray crystal structure, and binding data. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[48]  S. Thiru,et al.  RAPAMYCIN FOR IMMUNOSUPPRESSION IN ORGAN ALLOGRAFTING , 1989, The Lancet.

[49]  Brian K Shoichet,et al.  Prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Docking and scoring: successes and gaps. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[50]  N. P. Todorov,et al.  Receptor flexibility in de novo ligand design and docking. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[51]  Richard A. Friesner,et al.  Comparative Performance of Several Flexible Docking Programs and Scoring Functions: Enrichment Studies for a Diverse Set of Pharmaceutically Relevant Targets , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[52]  R. Wolfenden,et al.  Transition state analog inhibitors and enzyme catalysis. , 1976, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[53]  Themis Lazaridis,et al.  Water at biomolecular binding interfaces. , 2007, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[54]  D. Speicher,et al.  Cyclophilin: a specific cytosolic binding protein for cyclosporin A. , 1984, Science.

[55]  James L. Abbruzzese,et al.  Protein Expression Profiles in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Compared with Normal Pancreatic Tissue and Tissue Affected by Pancreatitis as Detected by Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis and Mass Spectrometry , 2004, Cancer Research.

[56]  Jung-Hsin Lin,et al.  The relaxed complex method: Accommodating receptor flexibility for drug design with an improved scoring scheme. , 2003, Biopolymers.

[57]  Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al.  Representing receptor flexibility in ligand docking through relevant normal modes. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[58]  Donald Hamelberg,et al.  Standard free energy of releasing a localized water molecule from the binding pockets of proteins: double-decoupling method. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[59]  Alfonso T García-Sosa,et al.  Free Energy Calculations of Mutations Involving a Tightly Bound Water Molecule and Ligand Substitutions in a Ligand‐Protein Complex , 2010, Molecular informatics.

[60]  V. Mikol,et al.  The role of water molecules in the structure-based design of (5-hydroxynorvaline)-2-cyclosporin: synthesis, biological activity, and crystallographic analysis with cyclophilin A. , 1995, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[61]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .