Extracting information from hospital records: what patients think about consent

Background and objective: There is increasing regulation and concern about the use of material from patients’ records. Studies on patients’ views have focused on primary care and on use of material for research. This study investigated patients’ preferences about whether and how doctors should seek permission for use of specified items of anonymised information from their hospital records for clinical audit, teaching, national data collection and research. Method: A specially designed questionnaire sent to recently discharged patients under the care of medical and surgical specialists. Results: 166/316 (53%) patients completed the questionnaires. The percentage of respondents who “definitely wanted” or “preferred” to be asked for permission for use of anonymised information was highest for medical history (21%) and reasons for treatment (20%). The purpose for which information was requested (eg, research, audit) made little difference to the overall percentages (range 10–12%). 21 (13%) patients “definitely wanted” to be asked for permission for use of some item or proposed use of information—most had no preference or preferred not to be asked. The most popular method for asking permission was signing a form while in hospital, rather than by specific requests later. Conclusions: Most hospital patients have no preference or prefer not to be asked permission for doctors to use information from their records. About 1 in 8 patients would like to be asked for permission, some even for clinical audit of outcomes—although a minority, this could compromise thorough clinical audit. Systems for obtaining permission when patients are admitted to hospital need to be considered. Resolution of uncertainties surrounding legislation on the use of information would be helpful to clinicians.

[1]  H. M. Evans,et al.  Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study , 2004, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[2]  Karim Keshavjee,et al.  Patients' consent preferences for research uses of information in electronic medical records: interview and survey data , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  N Britten,et al.  Confidentiality of medical records: the patient's perspective. , 1995, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[4]  Ian Mitchell,et al.  Patients' opinions on privacy, consent and the disclosure of health information for medical research. , 2006, Chronic diseases in Canada.

[5]  Michael Parker,et al.  When is research on patient records without consent ethical? , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[6]  G C Hitchcock,et al.  National Cancer Registry. , 1989, The New Zealand medical journal.

[7]  L. Doyal.  Informed consent in medical research: Journals should not publish research to which patients have not given fully informed consent–with three exceptions , 1997 .

[8]  A. Bottle,et al.  Paediatric cardiac surgical mortality in England after Bristol: descriptive analysis of hospital episode statistics 1991-2002 , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  E C Mulligan,et al.  Confidentiality in health records: evidence of current performance from a population survey in South Australia , 2001, The Medical journal of Australia.

[10]  E. Draper,et al.  A feasibility study of signed consent for the collection of patient identifiable information for a national paediatric clinical audit database , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  Tsuguya Fukui,et al.  Attitudes of the Japanese public and doctors towards use of archived information and samples without informed consent: Preliminary findings based on focus group interviews , 2002, BMC medical ethics.

[12]  M. Coleman,et al.  National survey of British public's views on use of identifiable medical data by the National Cancer Registry , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  Batami Sadan.  Patient data confidentiality and patient rights , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[14]  B. Woodward,et al.  Requiring Consent vs. Waiving Consent for Medical Records Research: A Minnesota Law vs. the U.S. (HIPAA) Privacy Rule , 2003, Health Care Analysis.

[15]  Richard J. Whiddett,et al.  Patients' attitudes towards sharing their health information , 2006, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[16]  Patient consent for release of sensitive information from their medical records: an exploratory study. , 1999, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[17]  J. Higgins.  The Patient Information Advisory Group and the use of patient-identifiable data , 2003, Journal of health services research & policy.

[18]  M Stone,et al.  What proportion of patients refuse consent to data collection from their records for research purposes? , 2000, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[19]  S. Woolf,et al.  Selection bias from requiring patients to give consent to examine data for health services research. , 2000, Archives of family medicine.

[20]  Rodney A Hayward,et al.  Patients, privacy and trust: patients' willingness to allow researchers to access their medical records. , 2007, Social science & medicine.

[21]  C. Verity,et al.  Education and debate: Consent, confidentiality, and the threat to public health surveillance * Commentary: Don't waive consent lightly---involve the public , 2002 .

[22]  Alexander M Clark,et al.  Attaining adequate consent for the use of electronic patient records: an opt-out strategy to reconcile individuals' rights and public benefit. , 2005, Public health.

[23]  Angus Nicoll,et al.  Consent, confidentiality, and the threat to public health surveillance. , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.