Systematic errors of EIT systems determined by easily-scalable resistive phantoms

We present a simple method to determine systematic errors that will occur in the measurements by EIT systems. The approach is based on very simple scalable resistive phantoms for EIT systems using a 16 electrode adjacent drive pattern. The output voltage of the phantoms is constant for all combinations of current injection and voltage measurements and the trans-impedance of each phantom is determined by only one component. It can be chosen independently from the input and output impedance, which can be set in order to simulate measurements on the human thorax. Additional serial adapters allow investigation of the influence of the contact impedance at the electrodes on resulting errors. Since real errors depend on the dynamic properties of an EIT system, the following parameters are accessible: crosstalk, the absolute error of each driving/sensing channel and the signal to noise ratio in each channel. Measurements were performed on a Goe-MF II EIT system under four different simulated operational conditions. We found that systematic measurement errors always exceeded the error level of stochastic noise since the Goe-MF II system had been optimized for a sufficient signal to noise ratio but not for accuracy. In time difference imaging and functional EIT (f-EIT) systematic errors are reduced to a minimum by dividing the raw data by reference data. This is not the case in absolute EIT (a-EIT) where the resistivity of the examined object is determined on an absolute scale. We conclude that a reduction of systematic errors has to be one major goal in future system design.

[1]  P Rolfe,et al.  Analysis and assessment of errors in a parallel data acquisition system for electrical impedance tomography. , 1988, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[2]  R Bayford,et al.  Design and calibration of a compact multi-frequency EIT system for acute stroke imaging. , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[3]  Günter Hahn,et al.  Determination of the dynamic measurement error of EIT systems , 2007 .

[4]  H Griffiths,et al.  A Cole phantom for EIT. , 1995, Physiological measurement.

[5]  J P Kaipio,et al.  Assessment of errors in static electrical impedance tomography with adjacent and trigonometric current patterns. , 1997, Physiological measurement.

[6]  H Griffiths,et al.  A dual-frequency electrical impedance tomography system. , 1989, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Lorenzo Fabrizi,et al.  Evaluation of the performance of the Multifrequency Electrical Impedance Tomography (MFEIT) intended for imaging acute stroke , 2007 .

[8]  R H Bayford,et al.  Design and performance of the UCLH mark 1b 64 channel electrical impedance tomography (EIT) system, optimized for imaging brain function. , 2002, Physiological measurement.

[9]  H Griffiths A phantom for electrical impedance tomography. , 1988, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[10]  D S Holder,et al.  Analysis of resting noise characteristics of three EIT systems in order to compare suitability for time difference imaging with scalp electrodes during epileptic seizures , 2007, Physiological measurement.

[11]  D S Holder,et al.  A review of errors in multi-frequency EIT instrumentation , 2007, Physiological measurement.

[12]  T Schröder,et al.  A simple method to check the dynamic performance of electrical impedance tomography systems. , 2000, Physiological measurement.

[13]  D S Holder,et al.  Some practical biological phantoms for calibrating multifrequency electrical impedance tomography. , 1996, Physiological measurement.

[14]  Jean-Pierre Morucci,et al.  Modular Cole phantom for parametric electrical impedance tomography , 1996, Proceedings of 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  H Griffiths,et al.  Systematic errors in multi-frequency EIT. , 2000, Physiological measurement.

[16]  Dr D. Jennings,et al.  Design of an electrical impedance tomography phantom using active elements , 2000, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[17]  J P Morucci,et al.  Bioelectrical impedance techniques in medicine. Part III: Impedance imaging. First section: general concepts and hardware. , 1996, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.