Optimising Mobile Mapping System Laser Scanner Orientation

Multiple laser scanner hardware configurations can be applied to Mobile Mapping Systems. As best practice, laser scanners are rotated horizontally or inclined vertically to increase the probability of contact between the laser scan plane and any surfaces that are perpendicular to the direction of travel. Vertical inclinations also maximise the number of scan profiles striking narrow vertical features, something that can be of use when trying to recognise features. Adding a second scanner allows an MMS to capture more data and improve laser coverage of an area by filling in laser shadows. However, in any MMS the orientation of each scanner on the platform must be decided upon. Changes in the horizontal or vertical orientations of the scanner can increase the range to vertical targets and the road surface, with excessive scanner angles lowering point density significantly. Limited information is available to assist the manufacturers or operators in identifying the optimal scanner orientation for roadside surveys. The method proposed in this paper applies 3D surface normals and geometric formulae to assess the influence of scanner orientation on point distribution. It was demonstrated that by changing the orientation of the scanner the number of pulses striking a target could be greatly increased, and the number of profiles intersecting with the target could also be increased—something that is particularly important for narrow vertical features. The importance of identifying the correct trade-off between the number of profiles intersecting with the target and the point spacing was also raised.

[1]  Jianping Wu,et al.  A Voxel-Based Method for Automated Identification and Morphological Parameters Estimation of Individual Street Trees from Mobile Laser Scanning Data , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[2]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Seamless Mapping of River Channels at High Resolution Using Mobile LiDAR and UAV-Photography , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[3]  D. Shepard A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data , 1968, ACM National Conference.

[4]  N. El-Sheimy An Overview of Mobile Mapping Systems , 2005 .

[5]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Small-footprint laser scanning simulator for system validation, error assessment, and algorithm development. , 2009 .

[6]  Stefan van der Spek,et al.  Classifying pedestrian movement behaviour from GPS trajectories using visualization and clustering , 2014, Ann. GIS.

[7]  Anttoni Jaakkola,et al.  Area-Based Approach for Mapping and Monitoring Riverine Vegetation Using Mobile Laser Scanning , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[8]  Yuwei Chen,et al.  Mobile mapping system and computing methods for modelling of road environment , 2009, 2009 Joint Urban Remote Sensing Event.

[9]  Pankaj Kumar,et al.  Initial Results From European Road Safety Inspection (eursi) Mobile Mapping Project , 2010 .

[10]  Claus Brenner,et al.  Global Localization of Vehicles Using Local Pole Patterns , 2009, DAGM-Symposium.

[11]  Paul H. Lewis,et al.  An automated algorithm for extracting road edges from terrestrial mobile LiDAR data , 2013 .

[12]  M. Jones,et al.  Image quality control in the Meteosat Ground Processing System , 1981 .

[13]  Timothy McCarthy,et al.  MIMIC: Mobile mapping point density calculator , 2012, COM.Geo '12.

[14]  Fadi Dornaika,et al.  EXTRACTING B UILDING FOOTPRINTS FROM 3D POINT CLOUDS USING TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING AT STREET LEVEL , 2009 .

[15]  François Goulette,et al.  Simulation-based comparative analysis for the design of Laser Terrestrial Mobile Mapping Systems , 2008 .

[16]  Ayman Habib,et al.  ALTERNATIVE METHODOLOGIES FOR THE ESTIMATION OF LOCAL POINT DENSITY INDEX: MOVING TOWARDS ADAPTIVE LIDAR DATA PROCESSING , 2012 .

[17]  Ty A. Lasky,et al.  LiDAR for Data Efficiency , 2011 .

[18]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Detection of Vertical Pole-Like Objects in a Road Environment Using Vehicle-Based Laser Scanning Data , 2010, Remote. Sens..

[19]  Timothy J McCarthy,et al.  Mobile mapping system performance - an analysis of the effect of laser scanner configuration and vehicle velocity on scan profiles , 2010 .

[20]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  ROAD ENVIRONMENT MAPPING SYSTEM OF THE FINNISH GEODETIC INSTITUTE - FGI ROAMER - , 2007 .

[21]  Yi Lin,et al.  Performance Analysis of Mobile Laser Scanning Systems in Target Representation , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[22]  George Vosselman,et al.  Recognizing basic structures from mobile laser scanning data for road inventory studies , 2011 .

[23]  M. Vastaranta,et al.  Predicting individual tree attributes from airborne laser point clouds based on the random forests technique , 2011 .

[24]  George Vosselman,et al.  EXTRACTING WINDOWS FROM TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING , 2007 .

[25]  Timothy McCarthy,et al.  MIMIC: An Innovative Methodology for Determining Mobile Laser Scanning System Point Density , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[26]  Timothy McCarthy,et al.  Calculation of Target-Specific Point Distribution for 2D Mobile Laser Scanners , 2014, Sensors.

[27]  George Vosselman,et al.  Accuracy of 3D city models: EuroSDR comparison , 2005 .

[28]  Pankaj Kumar,et al.  Automated road markings extraction from mobile laser scanning data , 2014, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[29]  Timothy J McCarthy,et al.  Calculating the effect of dual-axis scanner rotations and surface orientation on scan profiles , 2011 .

[30]  David S. Hurwitz,et al.  Guidelines for the Use of Mobile LIDAR in Transportation Applications , 2013 .

[31]  Norbert Haala,et al.  GRAMMAR SUPPORTED FACADE RECONSTRUCTION FROM MOBILE LIDAR MAPPING , 2009 .

[32]  Craig L. Glennie,et al.  Synthesis of Transportation Applications of Mobile LIDAR , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[33]  Bharat Lohani,et al.  GENERATING LIDAR DATA IN LABORATORY: LIDAR SIMULATOR , 2007 .