Brāhmī-derived orthographies are typologically Āksharik but functionally predominantly alphabetic

We claim that the orthographies of South and Southeast Asia, which are derived from the Brāhmī writing system, are best described by the typological term “āksharik” (/ɑ:kʃərik/), and that they are functionally predominantly alphabetic. We derive these descriptions from the encoding units that went into the design of the orthographies and the decoding units that are likely to be relevant for reading text in them. More commonly used terms, such as “alphasyllabary” or “abugida”, used to describe these orthographies, are not appropriate. Our focus is on Hindī, an Indo-Āryan language and its orthography, Devnāgrī. Our arguments are based on structural-descriptive, historical-linguistic and theoretical accounts as well as some psycholinguistic evidence. We also support claims that the universal and language-specific features of any writing system should be studied in the context of its associated spoken language or languages.

[1]  Harold W. Stevenson,et al.  Learning to read Chinese. , 1983 .

[2]  Thomas Crump,et al.  Visible Speech: The Diverse Oneness of Writing Systems. , 1990 .

[3]  C. F. Hockett,et al.  The World's Writing Systems , 1997 .

[4]  I. J. Gelb A study of writing : the foundations of grammatology , 1953 .

[5]  Ram Frost,et al.  Towards a universal model of reading , 2012, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  William Bright,et al.  A Matter of Typology: Alphasyllabaries and Abugidas , 1999 .

[7]  Charles N. Li,et al.  Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar , 1989 .

[8]  Manfred Mayrhofer,et al.  A Sanskrit Grammar , 1972 .

[9]  Ignatius G. Mattinglyt Linguistic Awareness and Orthographic Form * , 2009 .

[10]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[11]  A. D. Joaquin,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy , 2009 .

[12]  W. S. Allen,et al.  Phonetics in ancient India , 1954 .

[13]  E. Bender,et al.  Introduction to Pali , 1963 .

[14]  D. Diringer,et al.  The Alphabet: A Key to the History of Mankind. , 1949 .

[15]  Ignatius G. Mattingly,et al.  Did Orthographies Evolve? , 1985 .

[16]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Reading in different writing systems: One architecture, multiple solutions. , 2011 .

[18]  George Cardona,et al.  Indian Epigraphy: A Guide to the Study of Inscriptions in Sanskrit, Prakrit, and the other Indo-Aryan Languages , 2000 .

[19]  L. Katz,et al.  The reading process is different for different orthographies : the orthographic depth hypothesis , 1992 .

[20]  Charles Hulme,et al.  The science of reading: A handbook. , 2005 .

[21]  Siddheshwar Varma Critical Studies in the Phonetic Observations of Indian Grammarians , 1961 .

[22]  H. Rogers Writing Systems: A Linguistic Approach , 2004 .

[23]  Richard Sproat,et al.  Book Reviews: A Computational Theory of Writing Systems , 2006, CL.

[24]  Colin P. Masica The Indo-Aryan Languages , 1991 .