Modality effects in the coding reproduction of rhythms

The temporal coding assumption is that time of presentation is coded more accurately for auditory events than for visual events. This assumption has been used to explain the modality effect, in which recall of recent auditory events is superior to recall of recent visual events. We tested the temporal coding assumption by examining the coding and reproduction of quintessentially temporal stimuli—rhythms. The rhythms were produced by sequences of short and long auditory stimuli or short and long visual stimuli; in either case, the task was to reproduce the temporal sequence. The results from four experiments demonstrated reproduction of auditory rhythms superior to that of visual rhythms. We conclude that speech-based explanations of modality effects cannot accommodate these findings, whereas the findings are consistent with explanations based on the temporal coding assumption.

[1]  W J Friedman,et al.  A follow-up to “Scale Effects in Memory for the Time of Events”: The earthquake study , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[2]  E. Winograd,et al.  Reminding as a basis for temporal judgments. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  S Handel,et al.  Effect of rhythmic grouping on stream segregation. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  The unattended speech effect: perception or memory? , 1986 .

[5]  John M. Gardiner,et al.  When auditory memory is not overwritten , 1979 .

[6]  R. G. Crowder,et al.  Precategorical acoustic storage (PAS) , 1969 .

[7]  E. Klima,et al.  Nonauditory suffix effects in congenitally deaf signers of American Sign Language. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[8]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Spatial and temporal processing in the auditory and visual modalities , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[9]  W. Estes,et al.  Item and order information in short-term memory: Evidence for multilevel perturbation processes. , 1981 .

[10]  A G Samuel,et al.  Recency and suffix effects in serial recall of musical stimuli. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  J. S. Nairne,et al.  A framework for interpreting recency effects in immediate serial recall , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[12]  A. Glenberg,et al.  A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  V. Gregg,et al.  Concerning additional evidence of an auditory advantage in prerecency as well as recency recall , 1984 .

[14]  Ovid J. L. Tzeng,et al.  A study-phase retrieval model of temporal coding. , 1980 .

[15]  D. Routh,et al.  An “Across-the-Board” Modality Effect in Immediate Serial Recall , 1976, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  J M Gardiner,et al.  On recency and echoic memory. , 1983, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[17]  M. Posner,et al.  Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance. , 1976, Psychological review.

[18]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[19]  R. G. Crowder,et al.  On the remembrance of times past: The irregular list technique. , 1987 .

[20]  A J Wilkins,et al.  Scale effects in memory for the timeof events , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[21]  A. Bregman,et al.  Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  R. Greene.  Constraints on the long-term modality effect☆ , 1985 .

[23]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Evidence for auditory temporal distinctiveness: modality effects in order and frequency judgments. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  Linda A Roberts,et al.  Modality and suffix effects in memory for melodic and harmonic musical materials , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.