Analysis of factors affecting positron emission mammography (PEM) image formation

Image reconstruction for positron emission mammography (PEM) with the breast positioned between two parallel, planar detectors is usually performed by backprojection to image planes. Three important factors affecting PEM image reconstruction by backprojection are investigated: 1) image uniformity (flood) corrections, 2) image sampling (pixel size) and 3) count allocation methods. An analytic expression for uniformity correction is developed that incorporates factors for spatial-dependent detector sensitivity and geometric effects from acceptance angle limits on coincidence events. There is good agreement between experimental floods from a PEM system with a pixellated detector and numerical simulations. The analytic uniformity corrections are successfully applied to image reconstruction of compressed breast phantoms and reduce the necessity for flood scans at different image planes. Experimental and simulated compressed breast phantom studies show that lesion contrast is improved when the image pixel size is half of, rather than equal to, the detector pixel size, though this occurs at the expense of some additional image noise. In PEM reconstruction counts usually are allocated to the pixel in the image plane intersected by the line of response (LOR) between the centers of the detection pixels. An alternate count allocation method is investigated that distributes counts to image pixels in proportion to the area of the tube of response (TOR) connecting the detection pixels that they overlay in the image plane. This TOR method eliminates some image artifacts that occur with the LOR method and increases tumor signal-to-noise ratios at the expense of a slight decrease in tumor contrast. Analysis of image uniformity, image sampling and count allocation methods in PEM image reconstruction points to ways of improving image formation. Further work is required to optimize image reconstruction parameters for particular detection or quantitation tasks.

[1]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Utility of PET in Breast Cancer. , 1999, Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T.

[2]  J L Sunshine,et al.  Evaluation of breast masses and axillary lymph nodes with [F-18] 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose PET. , 1993, Radiology.

[3]  J. Uribe,et al.  Breast cancer imaging studies with a variable field of view PET camera , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).

[4]  S. Majewski,et al.  The potential role of positron emission mammography for detection of breast cancer. A phantom study. , 2000, Medical physics.

[5]  R Freifelder,et al.  Dedicated PET scanners for breast imaging. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  A. G. Weisenberger,et al.  An apparatus for positron emission mammography-guided breast biopsy , 2000, Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (Cat. No.00CH37143).

[7]  C J Thompson,et al.  Results of preliminary clinical trials of the positron emission mammography system PEM-I: a dedicated breast imaging system producing glucose metabolic images using FDG. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Christopher J. Thompson,et al.  Positron emission mammography (PEM): a promising technique for detecting breast cancer , 1995 .

[9]  R L Wahl,et al.  Primary and metastatic breast carcinoma: initial clinical evaluation with PET with the radiolabeled glucose analogue 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. , 1991, Radiology.

[10]  K. Lange,et al.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[11]  S R Cherry,et al.  Design and evaluation of an LSO PET detector for breast cancer imaging. , 2000, Medical physics.

[12]  S S Gambhir,et al.  Impact of whole-body 18F-FDG PET on staging and managing patients with breast cancer: the referring physician's perspective. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  S. Majewski,et al.  Positron emission mammography-guided breast biopsy. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  C J Thompson,et al.  Feasibility study for positron emission mammography. , 1994, Medical physics.

[15]  Ronald H. Huesman,et al.  PET camera designs for imaging breast cancer and axillary node involvement , 1995 .

[16]  W. W. Moses,et al.  List-mode maximum-likelihood reconstruction applied to positron emission mammography (PEM) with irregular sampling , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.