Natural streamflow regime alterations: Damming of the Piave river basin (Italy)

A novel approach is proposed to estimate the natural streamflow regime of a river and to assess the extent of the alterations induced by dam operation related to anthropogenic (e.g., agricultural, hydropower) water uses in engineered river basins. The method consists in the comparison between the seasonal probability density function (pdf) of observed streamflows and the purportedly natural streamflow pdf obtained by a recently proposed and validated probabilistic model. The model employs a minimum of landscape and climate parameters and unequivocally separates the effects of anthropogenic regulations from those produced by hydroclimatic fluctuations. The approach is applied to evaluate the extent of the alterations of intra‐annual streamflow variability in a highly engineered alpine catchment of north‐eastern Italy, the Piave river. Streamflows observed downstream of the regulation devices in the Piave catchment are found to exhibit smaller means/modes, larger coefficients of variation, and more pronounced peaks than the flows that would be observed in the absence of anthropogenic regulation, suggesting that the anthropogenic disturbance leads to remarkable reductions of river flows, with an increase of the streamflow variability and of the frequency of preferential states far from the mean. Some structural limitations of management approaches based on minimum streamflow requirements (widely used to guide water policies) as opposed to criteria based on whole distributions are also discussed.

[1]  Andrea Rinaldo,et al.  Ecohydrological model of flow duration curves and annual minima , 2008 .

[2]  Brian Richter,et al.  Application of the Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration Software in Environmental Flow Setting 1 , 2007 .

[3]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Signatures of large‐scale soil moisture dynamics on streamflow statistics across U.S. climate regimes , 2007 .

[4]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Probabilistic characterization of base flows in river basins: Roles of soil, vegetation, and geomorphology , 2007 .

[5]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Numerical studies on soil moisture distributions in heterogeneous catchments , 2007 .

[6]  Andrea Rinaldo,et al.  Basin‐scale soil moisture dynamics and the probabilistic characterization of carrier hydrologic flows: Slow, leaching‐prone components of the hydrologic response , 2007 .

[7]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  Ecohydrology of Water-Controlled Ecosystems: Soil Moisture and Plant Dynamics , 2005 .

[8]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  Soil Water Balance and Ecosystem Response to Climate Change , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[9]  P. Wood,et al.  The influence of habitat structure and flow permanence on invertebrate communities in karst spring systems , 2003, Hydrobiologia.

[10]  David L. Galat,et al.  Restoring ecological integrity of great rivers: historical hydrographs aid in defining reference conditions for the Missouri River , 2000, Hydrobiologia.

[11]  A. Arthington,et al.  Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity , 2002, Environmental management.

[12]  Klement Tockner,et al.  Understanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restoration , 2001 .

[13]  J. Constantz Interaction between stream temperature, streamflow, and groundwater exchanges in alpine streams , 1998 .

[14]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[15]  David P. Braun,et al.  How much water does a river need , 1997 .

[16]  D. Tarboton A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models , 1997 .

[17]  David P. Braun,et al.  A Method for Assessing Hydrologic Alteration within Ecosystems , 1996 .

[18]  John L. Nieber,et al.  Regionalized drought flow hydrographs from a mature glaciated plateau , 1977 .