Building Up STEM: An Analysis of Teacher-Developed Engineering Design-Based STEM Integration Curricular Materials

Improving K–12 Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education has a priority on numerous education reforms in the United States. To that end, developing and sustaining quality programs that focus on integrated STEM education is critical for educators. Successful implementation of any STEM program is related to the curriculum materials used. Educators increasingly recognize the challenge of finding quality curriculum materials for integrated STEM education. In this study, 48 teachers participated in a year-long professional development program on STEM integration, and they designed 20 new engineering design-based STEM curriculum units. Each STEM curriculum unit includes an engineering challenge in which students develop technologies to solve the challenge; each unit also integrates grade level appropriate mathematics (data analysis and measurement) and one of the three science content areas: life science, physical science, or earth science. A total of 20 STEM integration units were assessed using the STEM Integration Curriculum Assessment (STEM-ICA) tool. Comparisons among the STEM units showed that the context or the engineering activities in physical science focused STEM units were more engaging and motivating comparing to the authentic contexts used in life science and earth science focused STEM units. Moreover, mathematics integration and communicating mathematics, science, and engineering thinking were not found to strongly contribute to the overall quality of the STEM units. Implications for designing effective professional development on integrated STEM education will be discussed.

[1]  Marlene M. Hurley,et al.  Reviewing Integrated Science and Mathematics: The Search for Evidence and Definitions From New Perspectives , 2001 .

[2]  G. Schwarz,et al.  Teacher as Curriculum , 2015 .

[3]  S. Shawer,et al.  Classroom-level curriculum development: EFL teachers as curriculum-developers, curriculum-makers and curriculum-transmitters , 2010 .

[4]  S. Selcen Guzey,et al.  A High‐Quality Professional Development for Teachers of Grades 3–6 for Implementing Engineering into Classrooms , 2014 .

[5]  L. A. Marascuilo,et al.  Nonparametric and Distribution-Free Methods for the Social Sciences , 1977 .

[6]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom‐Based Practices , 2005 .

[7]  David A. Gillam,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2012 .

[8]  Jacquelyn F. Sullivan,et al.  Exploiting Design to Inspire Interest in Engineering Across the K-16 Engineering Curriculum* , 2004 .

[9]  Charles R. Coble,et al.  Teachers Designing Curriculum as Professional Development: A Model for Transformational Science Teaching. , 1997 .

[10]  Frances P Lawrenz,et al.  Technical Education Curriculum Assessment , 2004 .

[11]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .

[12]  J. Voogt,et al.  Teacher involvement in curriculum design: need for support to enhance teachers’ design expertise , 2014 .

[13]  L.J. Leifer,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[14]  Teri Cosentino.  STEM Lesson Essentials , 2013 .

[15]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research , 2014 .

[16]  C. Teddlie,et al.  Foundations of mixed methods research , 2013 .

[17]  George E. Glasson,et al.  Connecting Science and Mathematics Instruction: Pedagogical Context Knowledge for Teachers , 2005 .

[18]  Aran W. Glancy,et al.  Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education , 2014 .

[19]  R. Marx,et al.  Design‐based science and student learning , 2004 .

[20]  Kristen B. Wendell,et al.  Engineering Design‐Based Science, Science Content Performance, and Science Attitudes in Elementary School , 2013 .

[21]  Mark Pickett,et al.  Bridging Engineering and Science Teaching: A Collaborative Effort to Design Instruction for College Students , 2006 .

[22]  Susan M. Drake,et al.  Meeting Standards Through Integrated Curriculum , 2004 .

[23]  David A. Tumbarello,et al.  The Case for Stem Education: Challenges and Opportunities , 2013 .

[24]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[25]  Alex Ulam.  Design with Science , 2006 .

[26]  J. Voogt,et al.  Teacher Learning in Collaborative Curriculum Design. , 2011 .

[27]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Art and Artifact of Children's Designing: A Situated Cognition Perspective , 1996 .

[28]  L. Katehi,et al.  Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. , 2009 .

[29]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  From Physical Models to Biomechanics: A Design-Based Modeling Approach. , 1998 .

[30]  Board on Testing.  Monitoring Progress Toward Successful K-12 STEM Education: A Nation Advancing? , 2013 .

[31]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Problem-Based Learning Meets Case-Based Reasoning in the Middle-School Science Classroom: Putting Learning by Design(tm) Into Practice , 2003 .

[32]  Ngss Lead States.  Next generation science standards : for states, by states , 2013 .

[33]  Donna F. Berlin.  A Network for Integrated Science and Mathematics Teaching and Learning Conference Plenary Papers. NSF/SSMA Wingspread Conference (Racine, Wisconsin, April 1991). School Science and Mathematics Association Topics for Teachers Series Number 7. , 1994 .

[34]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Designing to Learn About Complex Systems , 2000 .

[35]  Sean Brophy,et al.  Advancing Engineering Education in P‐12 Classrooms , 2008 .