Moving Risk of Crowds in the Entrance Confluence Area in the Presence of Channelizing Facilities

In recent years, the measures to interfere the crowds movement with physical facilities (such as channelizing, separation railing) have become more and more common, but how they affect the crowd movement and what moving risks exist in the entrance confluence area have not been fully revealed. Therefore, this paper analyzes the moving risk of the crowds before the bottleneck entrance area, in the presence of the channelizing barriers by controllable laboratory experiments. The visual color cloud charts of the local density, speed and confusion degree of moving directions within the entrance confluence area are analyzed in the presence of different gaps (1.05m and 0.7m) channelizing barriers, to further quantify the motion risk of the crowds. The study finds that the narrower gaps of the channelizing railings, the larger area of high-risk zones, and they have clear ‘lane formation’ effect in shaping the risk zones. The both ends of the channelizing barriers are higher moving risk zones for multi-entry sides conditions, but the area before the middle channels also needs to be closely concerned when the participants entering from two opposite entering sides. The study will provide theoretical basis for evaluating the safety of the setting conditions of the channelizing barriers and conducting scientific crowd management decisions.

[1]  Andreas Schadschneider,et al.  Exploring the behavior of self-organized queuing for pedestrian flow through a non-service bottleneck , 2021 .

[2]  Jinghong Wang,et al.  Method for guiding crowd evacuation at exit: The buffer zone , 2019, Safety Science.

[3]  Angel Garcimartín,et al.  Redefining the role of obstacles in pedestrian evacuation , 2018, New Journal of Physics.

[4]  Nirajan Shiwakoti,et al.  Examining effect of architectural adjustment on pedestrian crowd flow at bottleneck , 2018, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[5]  Claudio Feliciani,et al.  Measurement of congestion and intrinsic risk in pedestrian crowds , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[6]  Rainald Löhner,et al.  Fundamental Diagrams for Specific Very High Density Crowds , 2018 .

[7]  Akram Alomainy,et al.  Impulse Radio Ultra-Wideband Communications for Localization and Tracking of Human Body and Limbs Movement for Healthcare Applications , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[8]  Lizhong Yang,et al.  Passengers’ behavioral intentions towards congestion: Observational study of the entry restrictions at traffic bottleneck , 2017 .

[9]  Hend Suliman Al-Khalifa,et al.  Ultra Wideband Indoor Positioning Technologies: Analysis and Recent Advances † , 2016, Sensors.

[10]  Reza Maalek,et al.  Accuracy assessment of ultra-wide band technology in locating dynamic resources in indoor scenarios , 2016 .

[11]  Dietmar Bauer,et al.  Estimating Pedestrian Movement Characteristics for Crowd Control at Public Transport Facilities , 2008, 2008 11th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[12]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Dynamics of crowd disasters: an empirical study. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  Andreas Schadschneider,et al.  Experimental Analysis of the Restriction Mechanisms of Queuing on Pedestrian Flow at Bottleneck , 2020, Springer Proceedings in Physics.

[14]  John J. Fruin,et al.  Pedestrian planning and design , 1971 .