The Market Valuation of Environmental Capital Expenditures by Pulp and Paper Companies

The objective of this study is to examine the market valuation of environmental capital expenditure investment related to pollution abatement in the pulp and paper industry. The total environmental capital expenditure of $8.7 billion by our sample firms during 1989-2000 supports the focus on this industry. In order to be capitalized, an asset should be associated with future economic benefits. The existing environmental literature suggests that investors condition their evaluation of the future economic benefits arising from environmental capital expenditure on an assessment of the firms' environmental performance. This literature predicts the emergence of two environmental stereotypes: low-polluting firms that overcomply with existing environmental regulations, and high-polluting firms that just meet minimal environmental requirements. Our valuation evidence indicates that there are incremental economic benefits associated with environmental capital expenditure investment by low-polluting firms but not high-polluting firms. We also find that investors use environmental performance information to assess unbooked environmental liabilities, which we interpret to represent the future abatement spending obligations of high-polluting firms in the pulp and paper industry. We estimate average unbooked liabilities of $560 million for high-polluting firms, or 16.6 percent of market capitalization.

[1]  Ross L. Watts,et al.  The Relevance of the Value Relevance Literature for Financial Accounting Standard Setting , 2000 .

[2]  R. Handfield,et al.  The Green Supply Chain: Integrating Suppliers into Environmental Management Processes , 1998 .

[3]  Badi H. Baltagi,et al.  Incomplete panels: A comparative study of alternative estimators for the unbalanced one-way error component regression model , 1994 .

[4]  Denis Cormier,et al.  The impact of corporate pollution on market valuation: some empirical evidence , 1993 .

[5]  B. Lev,et al.  The Value-Relevance of Intangibles: The Case of Software Capitalization , 1998 .

[6]  Lester B. Lave,et al.  Estimating the Hidden Costs of Environmental Regulation , 2001 .

[7]  Shameek Konar,et al.  Information As Regulation: The Effect of Community Right to Know Laws on Toxic Emissions , 1997 .

[8]  Mary E. Barth,et al.  Relative valuation roles of equity book value and net income as a function of financial health , 1998 .

[9]  R. Kates,et al.  The International Response to the Threat of Chlorofluorocarbons to Atmospheric Ozone , 1982 .

[10]  Mary E. Barth,et al.  Factors Influencing Firms' Disclosures about Environmental Liabilities , 1995 .

[11]  D. Larcker,et al.  Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction , 1998 .

[12]  Sok-Hyon Kang,et al.  The effect of accounting procedure changes on CEOs' cash salary and bonus compensation , 1987 .

[13]  Mary E. Barth,et al.  Scale Effects in Capital Markets-Based Accounting Research , 2009 .

[14]  James A. Ohlson.  Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation* , 1995 .

[15]  Scott M. Smith,et al.  Computer Intensive Methods for Testing Hypotheses: An Introduction , 1989 .

[16]  S. Salop,et al.  Cost-Raising Strategies , 1987 .

[17]  The Relevance of the Value Relevance Literature For Financial Accounting Standard Setting: Another View , 2001 .

[18]  Shubhashis Gangopadhyay,et al.  Toward a theoretical model of voluntary overcompliance , 1995 .

[19]  K. E. Hughes.  The Value Relevance of Nonfinancial Measures of Air Pollution in the Electric Utility Industry , 2000 .

[20]  Mary E. Barth,et al.  Estimation And Market Valuation Of Environmental Liabilities Relating To Superfund Sites , 1994 .

[21]  Marilyn F. Johnson.  The Disclosure and Valuation of Environmental Capital Expenditures , 1997 .

[22]  S. Douglas Beets,et al.  Corporate Environmental Reports: The Need for Standards and an Environmental Assurance Service , 1999 .

[23]  W. Viscusi,et al.  Effectiveness of the EPA's Regulatory Enforcement: The Case of Industrial Effluent Standards , 1990, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[24]  H. White.  Asymptotic theory for econometricians , 1985 .

[25]  Katherine Campbell,et al.  Site uncertainty, allocation uncertainty, and superfund liability valuation , 1998 .

[26]  Jeffery Abarbanell,et al.  Is the Us Stock Market Myopic? , 2000 .

[27]  Victor L. Bernard,et al.  CROSS-SECTIONAL DEPENDENCE AND PROBLEMS IN INFERENCE IN MARKET-BASED ACCOUNTING RESEARCH , 1987 .

[28]  R. McCain.  Endogenous Bias in Technical Progress and Environmental Policy , 1978 .

[29]  Gerald A. Feltham,et al.  Uncertainty resolution and the theory of depreciation measurement , 1996 .

[30]  Denis Cormier,et al.  Investors' assessment of implicit environmental liabilities: An empirical investigation , 1997 .

[31]  J. Siegel,et al.  The Shrinking Equity Premium , 1999 .

[32]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .