An observational method for Postural Ergonomic Risk Assessment (PERA)

Abstract Monotonous, repetitive work characterizes production lines. Repetitive movements and awkward postures are the most prominent physical risk factors in the workplace. Various legislations have been enacted along with technical standards for ergonomic risk evaluation to ensure the safety of the operators. There are numerous methods to assess the ergonomic risk at work. However, most methods are not meant to be used for assessing cyclic work. This paper proposes a method, Postural Ergonomic Risk Assessment (PERA), which is suitable to evaluate the postural ergonomic risk of short cyclic assembly work. Its key features are simplicity and compliance with standards. The added value of the method is that it provides an analysis of every work task in the work cycle, which facilitates the identification of sources of high risk to the operator. The method has been verified on nine work cycles, constituted by 88 work tasks, and it demonstrates accordance with the European Assembly Worksheet (EAWS), which has been developed to comply with the relevant standards and is one of the most comprehensive tools for ergonomic risk assessment. Industrial relevance The simplicity and the compliance with standards of the proposed method would allow for a quick check of every work task of the work cycle and identification of problem areas. With further work, it would be possible to integrate the method along with work design tools used in the industry.

[1]  A Kilbom,et al.  Evaluation of perceived and self-reported manual forces exerted in occupational materials handling. , 1996, Applied ergonomics.

[2]  Ralph Bruder,et al.  The European Assembly Worksheet , 2013 .

[3]  J. Kaufman,et al.  Comparison of self-report, video observation and direct measurement methods for upper extremity musculoskeletal disorder physical risk factors , 2001, Ergonomics.

[4]  T. Saaty.  How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[5]  Stephen Bao,et al.  Force measurement in field ergonomics research and application , 2009 .

[6]  Svend Erik Mathiassen,et al.  Systematic evaluation of observational methods assessing biomechanical exposures at work. , 2010, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[7]  K. Kemmlert,et al.  A method assigned for the identification of ergonomic hazards - PLIBEL. , 1995, Applied ergonomics.

[8]  G. David.  Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. , 2005, Occupational medicine.

[9]  T Armstrong,et al.  Muscle responses to simulated torque reactions of hand-held power tools. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[10]  S E Mathiassen,et al.  Assessment of physical work load in epidemiologic studies: concepts, issues and operational considerations. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[11]  S Hignett,et al.  Rapid entire body assessment (REBA). , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  P. Buckle,et al.  Current techniques for assessing physical exposure to work-related musculoskeletal risks, with emphasis on posture-based methods. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[13]  W M Keyserling.  Postural analysis of the trunk and shoulders in simulated real time. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[14]  O Karhu,et al.  Correcting working postures in industry: A practical method for analysis. , 1977, Applied ergonomics.

[15]  R Kadefors,et al.  A cube model for the classification of work with hand tools and the formulation of functional requirements. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[16]  Richard Wells,et al.  Comparison of measurement methods for quantifying hand force , 2005, Ergonomics.

[17]  Sean Gallagher,et al.  Examining the Interaction of Force and Repetition on Musculoskeletal Disorder Risk , 2013, Hum. Factors.

[18]  Roland Örtengren,et al.  MTM-based ergonomic workload analysis , 2002 .