Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling To Guide Management of Drug Interactions between Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor and Antibiotics for the Treatment of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are the pathogens of concern in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) due to their association with deterioration of lung function. Treatment requires the use of a multidrug combination regimen, creating the potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)-modulating therapies, including elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor (ETI), which are eliminated mainly through cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A-mediated metabolism. An assessment of the DDI risk for ETI coadministered with NTM treatments, including rifabutin, clofazimine, and clarithromycin, is needed to provide appropriate guidance on dosing. ABSTRACT Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are the pathogens of concern in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) due to their association with deterioration of lung function. Treatment requires the use of a multidrug combination regimen, creating the potential for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)-modulating therapies, including elexacaftor, tezacaftor, and ivacaftor (ETI), which are eliminated mainly through cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A-mediated metabolism. An assessment of the DDI risk for ETI coadministered with NTM treatments, including rifabutin, clofazimine, and clarithromycin, is needed to provide appropriate guidance on dosing. The CYP3A-mediated DDIs between ETI and the NTM therapies rifabutin, clarithromycin, and clofazimine were evaluated using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling by incorporating demographic and physiological “system” data with drug physicochemical and in vitro parameters. Models were verified and then applied to predict untested scenarios to guide continuation of ETI during antibiotic treatment, using ivacaftor as the most sensitive CYP3A4 substrate. The predicted area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) ratios of ivacaftor when coadministered with rifabutin, clofazimine, or clarithromycin were 0.31, 2.98, and 9.64, respectively, suggesting moderate and strong interactions. The simulation predicted adjusted dosing regimens of ETI administered concomitantly with NTM treatments, which required delayed resumption of the standard dose of ETI once the NTM treatments were completed. The dosing transitions were determined based on the characteristics of the perpetrator drugs, including the mechanism of CYP3A modulation and their elimination half-lives. This study suggests increased doses of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor 200/100/450 mg in the morning and 100/50/375 mg in the evening when ETI is coadministered with rifabutin and reduced doses of elexacaftor/tezacaftor 200/100 mg every 48 h (q48h) and ivacaftor 150 mg daily or a dose of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor 200/100/150 mg q72h when coadministered with clofazimine or clarithromycin, respectively. Importantly, the PBPK simulations provide evidence in support of the use of treatments for NTM in pwCF receiving concomitant dose-adjusted ETI therapy.

[1]  L. Almond,et al.  PBPK-led guidance for cystic fibrosis patients taking elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir for the treatment of COVID-19. , 2022, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[2]  B. Small,et al.  Development of physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic models for standard of care and newer tuberculosis drugs , 2021, CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology.

[3]  E. Kemper,et al.  No drug-drug interaction between tezacaftor-ivacaftor and clofazimine: A case report. , 2021, Journal of Cystic Fibrosis.

[4]  H. Heijerman,et al.  Pharmacokinetic interactions between ivacaftor and cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors in people with cystic fibrosis and healthy controls. , 2021, Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society.

[5]  J. Brożek,et al.  Treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: an official ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA clinical practice guideline , 2020, European Respiratory Journal.

[6]  Christopher E. Keefer,et al.  Prediction of fraction unbound in microsomal and hepatocyte incubations - a comparison of methods across industry datasets. , 2019, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[7]  V. Garg,et al.  Pharmacokinetic and Drug–Drug Interaction Profiles of the Combination of Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor , 2019, Clinical and translational science.

[8]  H. Einolf,et al.  Evaluation of Clinical Drug Interaction Potential of Clofazimine Using Static and Dynamic Modeling Approaches , 2018, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[9]  G. Maartens,et al.  Pharmacokinetic interaction between bedaquiline and clofazimine in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis. , 2018, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[10]  T. Betsuyaku,et al.  Macrolide-Resistant Mycobacterium avium Complex Lung Disease: Analysis of 102 Consecutive Cases. , 2016, Annals of the American Thoracic Society.

[11]  K. Skolnik,et al.  Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Cystic Fibrosis , 2016, Current Treatment Options in Infectious Diseases.

[12]  Vikram Sinha,et al.  Predicting the Effect of CYP3A Inducers on the Pharmacokinetics of Substrate Drugs Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling: An Analysis of PBPK Submissions to the US FDA , 2016, Clinical Pharmacokinetics.

[13]  R. Gibson,et al.  US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and European Cystic Fibrosis Society consensus recommendations for the management of non-tuberculous mycobacteria in individuals with cystic fibrosis , 2015, Thorax.

[14]  Y. Takiguchi,et al.  Inhibitory Potential of Twenty Five Anti-tuberculosis Drugs on CYP Activities in Human Liver Microsomes. , 2015, Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin.

[15]  P. Yu,et al.  Drug Susceptibility Testing of 31 Antimicrobial Agents on Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria Isolates from China , 2015, BioMed research international.

[16]  N. Doi,et al.  Comparative Study of the Effects of Antituberculosis Drugs and Antiretroviral Drugs on Cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-Glycoprotein , 2014, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[17]  G. Layton,et al.  Effect of Rifampin and Rifabutin on the Pharmacokinetics of Lersivirine and Effect of Lersivirine on the Pharmacokinetics of Rifabutin and 25-O-Desacetyl-Rifabutin in Healthy Subjects , 2012, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[18]  L Zhang,et al.  Applications of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling and Simulation During Regulatory Review , 2011, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[19]  J. Turgeon,et al.  Assessment of competitive and mechanism-based inhibition by clarithromycin: use of domperidone as a CYP3A probe-drug substrate and various enzymatic sources including a new cell-based assay with freshly isolated human hepatocytes. , 2010, Drug metabolism letters.

[20]  P. Gilligan,et al.  Chronic Mycobacterium abscessus infection and lung function decline in cystic fibrosis. , 2010, Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society.

[21]  L. Saiman,et al.  Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Cystic Fibrosis , 2007, The Pediatric infectious disease journal.

[22]  Robert Horsburgh,et al.  An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. , 2007, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[23]  J. Nick Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Cystic Fibrosis , 2003, Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine.

[24]  Scott L Cockroft,et al.  The influence of nonspecific microsomal binding on apparent intrinsic clearance, and its prediction from physicochemical properties. , 2002, Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.

[25]  C. Horsburgh,et al.  A randomized, placebo-controlled study of rifabutin added to a regimen of clarithromycin and ethambutol for treatment of disseminated infection with Mycobacterium avium complex. , 1999, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[26]  R. Wallace,,et al.  Activities of four macrolides, including clarithromycin, against Mycobacterium fortuitum, Mycobacterium chelonae, and M. chelonae-like organisms , 1992, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[27]  C. Truffot-Pernot,et al.  Activities of sparfloxacin, azithromycin, temafloxacin, and rifapentine compared with that of clarithromycin against multiplication of Mycobacterium avium complex within human macrophages , 1991, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.