The department-wide approach to improving faculty instruction in higher education: A qualitative evaluation

This study applies qualitative methods to evaluate a model for the improvement of university teaching. According to this model, a departmental instruction specialist comprehensively treats issues concerning the quality of instruction within the department. This specialist gets to personally know all faculty members in need of teaching improvement and initiates preventive measures prior to the development of severe problems in instruction. Two years of implementation in the Physics Department at Tel Aviv University have shown an increase in quality of instruction and in faculty motivation and attitudes toward both instruction and students, suggesting that this approach has potential for department-wide teaching improvement. This article illustrates the complexities of the processes underlying teaching improvement, the longitudinal effort required to comprehensively improve instruction, and the reasons for failure and success in these efforts.

[1]  Lawrence M. Aleamoni,et al.  The usefulness of student evaluations in improving college teaching , 1974 .

[2]  Clinical Supervision Elements: The Clinic to Improve University Teaching. , 1976 .

[3]  J. Centra.  Faculty Development Practices in U.S. Colleges and Universities. , 1976 .

[4]  K. Feldman.  The superior college teacher from the students' view , 1976 .

[5]  N. Denzin.  The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[6]  Kenneth A. Feldman,et al.  Course characteristics and college students' ratings of their teachers: What we know and what we don't , 1978 .

[7]  J. Centra.  Faculty Development in Higher Education , 1978, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[8]  David A. Payne,et al.  The effect of college course evaluation feedback on instructor and student perceptions of instructional climate and effectiveness , 1979 .

[9]  Glenn R. Erickson,et al.  Improving College Teaching: An Evaluation of a Teaching Consultation Procedure , 1979 .

[10]  Peter A. Cohen,et al.  Effectiveness of student-rating feedback for improving college instruction: A meta-analysis of findings , 1980 .

[11]  Qualitative Evaluation Concepts and Cases in Curriculum Criticism / Willis, G., ed., McCutchan, Berkely, 1978 , 1980 .

[12]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation methods , 1981 .

[13]  Qualitative evaluation : concepts and cases in curriculum criticism , 1981 .

[14]  P. A. Cohen.  Student Ratings of Instruction and Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis of Multisection Validity Studies , 1981 .

[15]  M. Fullan,et al.  The Meaning of Educational Change , 1984 .

[16]  Nira Hativa.  What Makes Mathematics Lessons Easy to Follow, Understand, and Remember?. , 1983 .

[17]  H. Marsh.  Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching: Dimensionality, Reliability, Validity, Potential Biases and Usefulness , 1984 .

[18]  Good teaching of mathematics as perceived by undergraduate students , 1984 .

[19]  Joseph J. Stevens,et al.  The use of evaluative feedback for instructional improvement: A longitudinal perspective , 1984 .

[20]  Nira Hativa.  A study of the organization and clarity of mathematics lessonsf , 1985 .

[21]  I. Moses.  Using organisational theory in the promotion of evaluation — a case study , 1986 .

[22]  R. C. Wilson.  Improving Faculty Teaching: Effective Use of Student Evaluations and Consultants. , 1986 .

[23]  Teacher development and school improvement , 1986 .

[24]  B. Showers,et al.  Synthesis of Research on Staff Development: A Framework for Future Study and a State-of-the-Art Analysis. , 1987 .

[25]  Wilbert J. McKeachie,et al.  Can Evaluating Instruction Improve Teaching , 1987 .

[26]  M. Smith,et al.  Publishing Qualitative Research , 1987 .

[27]  P. Abrami,et al.  Students' Evaluations of University Teaching: Research Findings, Methodological Issues, and Directions for Future Research , 1987 .

[28]  Lewis Elton,et al.  Teaching in Higher Education: Appraisal and Training , 1987 .

[29]  Mary Kay Stein,et al.  Teacher development and school improvement: The process of teacher change☆ , 1988 .

[30]  Kenneth A. Feldman,et al.  Effective college teaching from the students' and faculty's view: Matched or mismatched priorities? , 1988 .

[31]  Assessment activities at large, research universities , 1989 .

[32]  Michael Theall,et al.  Student ratings of instruction : issues for improving practice , 1990 .

[33]  Peter A. Cohen,et al.  Bringing research into practice , 1990 .

[34]  William E. Cashin.  Students do rate different academic fields differently , 1990 .

[35]  Faculty development research in colleges, universities, and professional schools: The challenge , 1990 .

[36]  Philip C. Abrami,et al.  The Dimensionality of Ratings and Their Use in Personnel Decisions. , 1990 .

[37]  Wilbert J. McKeachie,et al.  Research on College Teaching: The Historical Background. , 1990 .

[38]  Michael Theall,et al.  Using student ratings for teaching improvement , 1991 .

[39]  Responsibility for staff development , 1992 .

[40]  William E. Cashin,et al.  Using global student rating items for summative evaluation. , 1992 .

[41]  Nira Hativa.  Attitudes towards instruction of faculty in mathematics and the physical sciences , 1993 .

[42]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  The Use of Students’ Evaluations and an Individually Structured Intervention to Enhance University Teaching Effectiveness , 1993 .

[43]  Nira Hativa,et al.  Using a single score for summative teacher evaluation by students , 1993 .