Biomechanical In Vitro Testing of Human Osteoporotic Lumbar Vertebrae Following Prophylactic Kyphoplasty With Different Candidate Materials

Study Design. Biomechanical study of human osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae following prophylactic kyphoplasty. Objectives. To evaluate the potential benefits of different resorbable candidate materials for use in prophylactic kyphoplasty compared with the behavior of polymethylmethacrylate cement. Summary of Background Data. Kyphoplasty using PMMA bone cement for the stabilization of fractured osteoporotic vertebrae has been established as a useful clinical tool. In several studies, consecutive compression fractures have been reported in vertebrae caudal or cranial to those augmented with bone cement. Consequently, some physicians have begun to treat adjacent vertebrae by means of prophylactic augmentation. Methods. Biomechanical in vitro testing was performed on 40 human osteoporotic nonfractured lumbar vertebrae. Three types of bone cement (PMMA, 2 different calcium phosphate cements) and one silicon derivative were assessed during compressive and cyclic sinusoidal testing. Each candidate material was applied bipedicularly under fluoroscopic control. Results. Differing processing qualities of the materials led to substantial differences during cement injection, in particular in the amount of cement filling of the vertebrae. However, in comparison to native vertebrae, augmented specimens showed significantly higher compressive failure. No significant differences between vertebral bodies treated with PMMA and those treated with either type of calcium phosphate cement were documented. The biomechanical properties of the vertebrae could not be significantly improved by the silicon derivative. Conclusion. This study demonstrated that calcium phosphate cements displayed identical behavior to PMMA cement with respect to in vitro mechanical qualities. Consequently, from a mechanical viewpoint, calcium phosphate cements may be used in addition to PMMA cement for kyphoplasty and prophylactic kyphoplasty. Silicon derivatives are apparently not recommendable as candidate materials for kyphoplasty.

[1]  Y. Kawaguchi,et al.  Calcium phosphate cement-based vertebroplasty compared with conservative treatment for osteoporotic compression fractures: a matched case-control study. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[2]  Y. van der Graaf,et al.  The risk of new osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the year after percutaneous vertebroplasty. , 2006, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[3]  D. Kallmes,et al.  New fractures after vertebroplasty: adjacent fractures occur significantly sooner. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[4]  Y. Shomura,et al.  Radiological Follow-up of New Compression Fractures Following Percutaneous Vertebroplasty , 2006, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[5]  R. Holt,et al.  Preliminary outcomes and efficacy of the first 360 consecutive kyphoplasties for the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[6]  H. Meinzer,et al.  CT volumetry of intravertebral cement after kyphoplasty. Comparison of polymethylmethacrylate and calcium phosphate in a 12-month follow-up , 2005, European Radiology.

[7]  R. Orler,et al.  [Vertebroplasty in severe osteoporosis. Technique and experience with multi-segment injection]. , 2004, Der Orthopade.

[8]  R. Orler,et al.  Vertebroplastik bei hochgradiger Osteoporose , 2004, Der Orthopäde.

[9]  L. Nolte,et al.  The Effect of Cement Augmentation on the Load Transfer in an Osteoporotic Functional Spinal Unit: Finite-Element Analysis , 2003, Spine.

[10]  L. Nolte,et al.  Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty. A biomechanical investigation. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  Stephen J. Ferguson,et al.  Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty , 2002 .

[12]  Christoph Fankhauser,et al.  Augmentation of mechanical properties in osteoporotic vertebral bones – a biomechanical investigation of vertebroplasty efficacy with different bone cements , 2001, European Spine Journal.

[13]  S. Belkoff,et al.  An Ex Vivo Biomechanical Evaluation of an Inflatable Bone Tamp Used in the Treatment of Compression Fracture , 2001, Spine.

[14]  F. Grados,et al.  Long-term observations of vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty. , 2009, Rheumatology.

[15]  Klaus-Dieter Kühn,et al.  Bone Cements: Up-to-Date Comparison of Physical and Chemical Properties of Commercial Materials , 2000 .

[16]  A. Levine,et al.  Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures. , 1999, Spine.

[17]  L. Claes,et al.  New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. , 1999, Spine.

[18]  M. Swiontkowski,et al.  Norian SRS cement augmentation in hip fracture treatment. Laboratory and initial clinical results. , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  Claus Christiansen,et al.  Diagnosis of Osteoporosis , 1992, Southern medical journal.