Comparative biodiversity of aquatic habitats in the European agricultural landscape

Recent evidence has begun to call into question the assumption that aquatic biodiversity is concentrated exclusively in larger rivers and lakes, instead showing that it is distributed throughout the landscape and that small waterbodies, such as ponds and ditches, make a significant contribution to biodiversity. We compared the physicochemical and aquatic biodiversity characteristics of ditches, lakes, ponds, rivers and streams in five locations in Europe in three biogeographic zones. At the individual site level (alpha diversity), rivers were found to be the most species-rich waterbodies; however, at the regional level (gamma diversity), ponds were the most species-rich aquatic habitat for both wetland plants and macroinvertebrates. In terms of rare species, ponds also had a higher rarity value, measured by a Species Rarity Index, than other habitat types, although data for this analysis were only available from the United Kingdom. The high biodiversity values of ponds suggest that they should be more central to strategies for the protection and management of aquatic biodiversity.

[1]  S. Rundle,et al.  The net result: evaluating species richness extrapolation techniques for littoral pond invertebrates , 2003 .

[2]  B. Malmqvist,et al.  Macroinvertebrate taxonomic richness, community structure and nestedness in Swedish streams. , 2000 .

[3]  D. Sear,et al.  Comparative biodiversity of rivers, streams, ditches and ponds in an agricultural landscape in Southern England , 2004 .

[4]  Stephen James Ormerod,et al.  The microdistribution of three uncommon freshwater gastropods in the drainage ditches of British grazing marshes , 2004 .

[5]  A. Schmidt‐Kloiber,et al.  The effect of taxonomic resolution on the assessment of ecological water quality classes , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[6]  J. Downing,et al.  The global abundance and size distribution of lakes, ponds, and impoundments , 2006 .

[7]  R. Stoks,et al.  Ponds and pools as model systems in conservation biology, ecology and evolutionary biology , 2005 .

[8]  D. Schindler,et al.  Alteration of Nutrient Cycles and Algal Production Resulting from Fish Introductions intoMountain Lakes , 2001, Ecosystems.

[9]  B. Meatyard.  New Atlas of the British and Irish Flora: By C.D. Preston, D.A. Pearman and T.D. Dines. Published by Oxford University Press, 2002. ISBN 0 19 851067 5 (Hardback with CD). 912 pages. Price £99.95 , 2003 .

[10]  J. T. Lee,et al.  A comparison of the catchment sizes of rivers, streams, ponds, ditches and lakes: implications for protecting aquatic biodiversity in an agricultural landscape , 2008, Hydrobiologia.

[11]  Duncan Painter,et al.  Macroinvertebrate distributions and the conservation value of aquatic Coleoptera, Mollusca and Odonata in the ditches of traditionally managed and grazing fen at Wicken Fen, UK , 1999 .

[12]  J. Wright,et al.  The influence of seasonal and taxonomic factors on the ordination and classification of running‐water sites in Great Britain and on the prediction of their macro‐invertebrate communities , 1984 .

[13]  Patrick D. Armitage,et al.  Ditch communities: a major contributor to floodplain biodiversity , 2003 .

[14]  P. Verdonschot,et al.  Ecological characterization of surface waters in the province of Overijssel, The Netherlands , 1990 .

[15]  J. Lachavanne,et al.  Does size matter? The relationship between pond area and biodiversity , 2002 .

[16]  Charles P. Hawkins,et al.  Weak correspondence between landscape classifications and stream invertebrate assemblages: implications for bioassessment , 2000, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[17]  E. Jeppesen,et al.  Pond or lake: does it make any difference? , 2005 .

[18]  A. Fitter,et al.  Flora Europaea Vol. 4, edited by T. G. Tutin, V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters, and D. A. Webb. Cambridge University Press, £25. , 1977, Oryx.

[19]  F. Chiarotti,et al.  Macroinvertebrate diversity and conservation status of Mediterranean ponds in Italy: water permanence and mesohabitat influence , 2005 .

[20]  P. Usseglio-Polatera.  Theoretical habitat templets, species traits, and species richness: aquatic insects in the Upper Rhône River and its floodplain , 1994 .

[21]  S. Rose,et al.  Dynamics and management of plant communities in ditches bordering arable fenland in eastern England , 2004 .

[22]  M. Scheffer,et al.  Small habitat size and isolation can promote species richness: second-order effects on biodiversity in shallow lakes and ponds , 2006 .

[23]  J. Heino,et al.  Characterizing macroinvertebrate assemblage structure in relation to stream size and tributary position , 2005, Hydrobiologia.

[24]  C. Reynolds,et al.  The wetland plant and macroinvertebrate assemblages of temporary ponds in England and Wales , 2004 .

[25]  M. Scheffer,et al.  Vegetation abundance in lowland flood plan lakes determined by surface area, age and connectivity , 2003 .

[26]  P. Williams,et al.  15 years of pond assessment in Britain : results and lessons learned from the work of Pond Conservation , 2005 .

[27]  P. Williams,et al.  The freshwater biota of British agricultural landscapes and their sensitivity to pesticides , 2007 .

[28]  D. Bilton,et al.  Classification of water beetle assemblages in arable fenland and ranking of sites in relation to conservation value , 1989 .